1. 中国建筑西南勘察设计研究院有限公司,四川,成都,610052
2. 成都理工大学 地质灾害防治与地质环境保护国家重点实验室,四川,成都,610059
纸质出版:2020
移动端阅览
王飞龙, 陈明, 王晓迪, 等. 汶川地震震中地区崩滑体的植被恢复与长期效应[J]. 水土保持通报, 2020,40(3):175-179.
Wang Feilong, Chen Ming, Wang Xiaodi, et al. Vegetation Recovery of Co-seismic Landslide and Long-Term Effect at Central Area of Wenchuan Earthquake[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2020, 40(3): 175-179.
王飞龙, 陈明, 王晓迪, 等. 汶川地震震中地区崩滑体的植被恢复与长期效应[J]. 水土保持通报, 2020,40(3):175-179. DOI: 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2020.03.025.
Wang Feilong, Chen Ming, Wang Xiaodi, et al. Vegetation Recovery of Co-seismic Landslide and Long-Term Effect at Central Area of Wenchuan Earthquake[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2020, 40(3): 175-179. DOI: 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2020.03.025.
[目的] 评估汶川地震震中地区崩滑体自然植被恢复过程,旨在为该区震后地质环境恢复、灾害防治和重建提供依据。[方法] 以四川省汶川县映秀镇为研究区,以多期空间分辨率为30 m×30 m的Landsat遥感影像为数据源,分析震后崩滑体上的植被动态恢复变化,结合地形因子分析地震9 a后植被恢复的空间分布特征。[结果] 研究区震后至2011年,经历植被恢复程度较差,差等水平以下占比68%,期间暴雨泥石流活动频率高,至2013年后就达到一个较好的恢复水平,差等水平以下占比32%,之后就处于一个缓慢的恢复过程,至2017年植被恢复差等以下的崩滑体仍主要处于30°~50°的坡度区间,1 500~2 100 m高程区间、东南坡向。[结论] 四川省汶川县映秀镇总体上经过近9 a的恢复过程,植被覆盖度恢复到0.74,与震前相比差值为0.08,根据拟合模型预计2022年植被覆盖度能恢复到震前水平,但仍主要以草本和灌木为主,植被种群结构与震前差异较大。
[Objective] The vegetation recovery process of the co-seismic landslide at central area of Wenchuan earthquake was assessed in order to provide the basis for the ecological environment restoration
disaster prevention
and reconstruction after the earthquake in the study area.[Methods] Yingxiu Town of Wenchuan County
Sichuan Province was taken as a study area
and the dynamic changes of vegetation at landslide sites after the earthquake were analyzed based on multi-temporal images with a resolution of 30 m. The spatial distribution characteristics of vegetation recovery in the past nine years were analyzed based on the topographic factors.[Results] The vegetation of the landslides did not recover well from 2008 to 2011 in the study area
and 68% of the sites were below the "poor" level. During this period
the frequencies of rainstorms and debris flow activity remained high. After 2013
a better recovery level was reached overall
and the number of landsides below the poor level decreased to 32%. Then
it had been in a slow recovery process. In 2017
the landslides with a poor level of vegetation recovery were mainly located in the slope range of 30°-50°
the elevation range of 1 500-2 100 m
and a southeast slope aspect.[Conclusion] In the 9 years after the earthquake
the vegetation cover index increased to 0.74
and the average vegetation coverage index value was 0.08 less than that before the earthquake. Based on the statistical model
the vegetation cover index is expected to return to the pre-earthquake level in 2022. However
the population structure of vegetation with herbs and shrubs is different from that before the earthquake.
Chigira M, Wang W N, Furuya T, et al. Geological causes and geomorphological precursors of the Tsaoling landslide triggered by the 1999 Chi-Chi earthquake, Taiwan [J]. Engineering Geology, 2003,68(3/4):259-273.
Gorum T, van Westen C J, Korup O, et al. Complex rupture mechanism and topography control symmetry of mass-wasting pattern, 2010 Haiti earthquake [J]. Geomorphology, 2013,184:127-138.
Chang Ming, Tang Chuan, Xia Chenhao, et al. Spatial distribution analysis of landslides triggered by the 2013-04-20 Lushan earthquake, China [J]. Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration, 2016,15(1):163-171.
Fan Xuanmei, Scaringi G, Xu Qiang, et al. Coseismic landslides triggered by the 8th August 2017 Ms 7.0 Jiuzhaigou earthquake (Sichuan, China): Factors controlling their spatial distribution and implications for the seismogenic blind fault identification [J]. Landslides, 2018,15(5):967-983.
Huang Runqiu, Fan Xuanmei. The landslide story [J]. Nature Geoscience, 2013,6(5):325-326.
Marc O, Hovius N, Meunier P, et al. Transient changes of landslide rates after earthquakes[J]. Geology, 2015,43(10):883-886.
Sidle R C, Ochiai H. Landslides: processes, prediction, and landuse [M]. Washington DC: American Geophysical Union, 2006.
Stokes A, Atger C, Bengough A G, et al. Desirable plant root traits for protecting natural and engineered slopes against landslides [J]. Plant and Soil, 2009,324(1/2):1-30.
Shen Ping, Zhang Limin, Chen H X, et al. Role of vegetation restoration in mitigating hillslope erosion and debris flows [J]. Engineering Geology, 2017,216:122-133.
Shiels A B, Walker L R. Landslides cause spatial and temporal gradients at multiple scales in the Luquillo Mountains of Puerto Rico [J]. Ecological Bulletins, 2013,54:211-221.
Keefer D K. The importance of earthquake-induced landslides to long-term slope erosion and slope-failure hazards in seismically active regions [J]. Geomorphology, 1994,10(1/2/3/4):265-284.
Holden J . An introduction to physical geography and the environment [J]. Jewish Quarterly Review, 1902, 15(3):56-59.
Kirkby M J. A consistent framework for modelling geomorphic processes and landform evolution [J]. Geophysical Monograph Series, 2003,135:95-102.
Wang J, Jin Z D, Hilton R G, et al. Controls on fluvial evacuation of sediment from earthquake-triggered landslides [J]. Geology, 2015,43(2):115-118.
许积层,卢涛,石福孙,等.基于NDVI监测5·12震后岷江河谷映秀汶川段滑坡体植被恢复[J].植物研究,2012,32(6): 750-755.
Yang Wentao, Qi Wenwen, Wang Ming, et al. Spatial and temporal analyses of post-seismic landslide changes near the epicentre of the Wenchuan earthquake [J]. Geomorphology, 2017,276:8-15.
Yang Wentao, Qi Wenwen, Zhou Jinxing. Decreased post-seismic landslides linked to vegetation recovery after the 2008 Wenchuan earthquake [J]. Ecological Indicators, 2018,89:438-444.
0
浏览量
1026
下载量
3
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010802024621