金塔沙漠不同人工植被类型土壤种子库特征

滕玉风; 占玉芳; 马力; 鲁延芳; 钱万建; 田晓萍

doi:10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2020.03.023

您当前的位置：

首页 >

文章列表页 >

金塔沙漠不同人工植被类型土壤种子库特征

试验研究

- 金塔沙漠不同人工植被类型土壤种子库特征
- Characteristics of Soil Seed Bank of Artificial Vegetation Types in Jinta Desert
- 水土保持通报 2020年40卷第3期页码：163-169
- 作者机构：
  
  张掖市林业科学研究院,甘肃,张掖,734000
- 作者简介：
- 基金信息：
  
  国家自然科学基金项目“河西走廊人工沙漠植被土壤种子库的结构与萌发策略研究”（31560240）
- DOI：10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2020.03.023
  中图分类号： S71;S728.4
- 纸质出版：2020
- 稿件说明：
移动端阅览
滕玉风, 占玉芳, 马力, 等. 金塔沙漠不同人工植被类型土壤种子库特征[J]. 水土保持通报, 2020,40(3):163-169.

Teng Yufeng, Zhan Yufang, Ma Li, et al. Characteristics of Soil Seed Bank of Artificial Vegetation Types in Jinta Desert[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2020, 40(3): 163-169.
滕玉风, 占玉芳, 马力, 等. 金塔沙漠不同人工植被类型土壤种子库特征[J]. 水土保持通报, 2020,40(3):163-169. DOI： 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2020.03.023.

Teng Yufeng, Zhan Yufang, Ma Li, et al. Characteristics of Soil Seed Bank of Artificial Vegetation Types in Jinta Desert[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2020, 40(3): 163-169. DOI： 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2020.03.023.

摘要

[目的

]

对甘肃省酒泉市金塔沙漠不同类型人工植被林地的土壤种子库进行调查研究，以揭示干旱条件下沙漠人工植被土壤种子库的分布规律、种子库物种多样性的变化特征以及土壤种子库与地上植被的关系，为河西走廊退化人工林生态系统的恢复与重建提供理论依据。[方法

]

通过野外植被调查、土壤种子库取样和土样萌发试验进行分析研究。[结果

]

①土壤种子库中，共统计到植物种有24种，胡杨—假苇拂子茅群落、胡杨+沙枣—柽柳+花棒+柠条—芦苇+黑沙蒿群落、梭梭—河西菊群落、柽柳—花花柴群落土壤种子库物种数依次为18种、18种、14种、3种，土壤种子密度依次为660.71，267.85，29.64，19.29粒/m

。土壤种子库中一年生、多年生草本的物种和密度占优势，乔木、灌木和半灌木种子所占比例较低。②物种多样性分析表明，乔木林土壤种子库物种的Margalef丰富度指数大于灌木林，土壤种子库物种的Shannon-Wiener多样性指数、Simpson多样性指数、Pielou均匀度指数变化趋势基本一致，均为胡杨+沙枣—柽柳+花棒+柠条—芦苇+黑沙蒿群落 > 柽柳—花花柴群落 > 梭梭—河西菊群落 > 胡杨—假苇拂子茅群落，而生态优势度指数与之相反。③乔木林土壤种子库植物与地上植被的相似程度高于灌木林。[结论

]

沙漠人工植被林地土壤种子库物种丰富度低，以草本植物为主，沙漠自我恢复度低，人工营造乔木林、灌木林有利于干旱荒漠区生态恢复与重建。

Abstract

[Objective] Soil seed banks of different types of artificial forest land were studied in the Jinta desert of Jiuquan City

Gansu Province

to reveal the artificial vegetation distribution rule of soil seed banks

variety characteristics of species diversity

and relationship between the soil seed bank and the vegetation. The goal was to provide a theoretical basis for the restoration and reconstruction of the degraded plantation ecosystem in the Hexi corridor.[Methods] The analytical research was conducted through field vegetation survey

soil seed bank sampling

and soil germination experiment.[Results] ① There were 24 kinds of plants species. The numbers of soil seed banks of the Populus euphratica-Calamagrostis pseudophragmites community

the P. euphratica + Elaeagnus angustifolia-Tamarix chinensis + Hedysarum scoparium + Caragana korshinskii-Phragmites australis + Artemisia ordosica community

the Haloxylon ammodendron-Hexinia polydichotoma community

and the Tamarix chinensis-Karelinia caspia community were 18

and 3 species

respectively. The seed densities were 660.71

267.85

29.64

and 19.29 granules/m2

respectively. The species and density of annual and perennial herbs were dominant

and the proportion of arbor

shrubs

and subshrubs was low. ② The analysis of species diversity showed that the Margalef richness index of soil seed banks of arboreal forest was larger than that of the shrubs. The variety trends of the Shannon-Wiener diversity index

Simpson diversity index

and Pielou evenness index of soil seed banks were almost the same as P. euphratica + E. angustifolia-T. chinensis + H. scoparium + C. korshinskii-P. australis + A. ordosica community > T. chinensis -K. caspia community > H. ammodendron -H. polydichotoma community > P. euphratica-C. pseudophragmites community. However

the ecological dominance index was in contrast. ③ The similarity in the arbor soil seed banks of arboreal forest and ground vegetation was higher than that of the shrubs.[Conclusion] The species abundance of the soil seed bank was low in artificial forest lands. Majority of them were herbs

the desert had a low restoration capacity

and the artificial arbor forests and shrubs were beneficial for the restoration and reconstruction of the arid desert area.

关键词

Keywords

references

Harper J L. Population Biology of plants [M]. Landon: Academic Press, 1977:15-39.

赵凌平,程积民,万惠娥.黄土高原典型草原区草地土壤种子库的动态分析[J].水土保持通报,2008,28(5):60-65.

闫巧玲,刘志民,李荣平.持久土壤种子库研究综述[J].生态学杂志,2005,24(8):948-952.

于顺利,陈宏伟,郎南军.土壤种子库的分类系统和种子在土壤中的持久性[J].生态学报,2007,27(5):2099-2108.

Matus G, Papp M, Tothmeresz B. Impact of management on vegetation dynamics and seed bank formation of inland dune grassland in Hungary [J]. Flora, 2005,200(3):296-306.

Gardmark A,Enberg K,Ripa J,et al. The ecology of recovery [J]. Annales Zoologici Fennici, 2003,40(2):131-144.

Tekle K,Bekele T.The role of soil seed banks in the rehabilitation of degraded hillslopes in Southern Wello, Ethiopia [J]. Biotropica, 2000,32(1):23-32.

曾彦军,王彦荣,南志标,等.阿拉善干旱荒漠区不同植被类型土壤种子库研究[J].应用生态学报,2003,14(9):1457-1463.

赵丽娅,李锋瑞,张华,等.科尔沁沙地围封沙质草甸土壤种子库特征的研究[J].生态学杂志,2004,23(2):45-49.

沈有信,刘文耀,崔建武.滇中喀斯特森林土壤种子库的种-面积关系[J].植物生态学报,2007,31(1):50-55.

沈有信,刘文耀,张彦东.东川干热退化山地不同植被恢复方式对物种组成与土壤种子库的影响[J].生态学报,2003,23(7):1454-1460.

任珺,陶玲,刘新民.水分供应对沙漠植被土壤种子库中种子萌发的影响[J].植物学报(英文版),2002,44(1):124-126.

赵丽娅,李兆华,李锋瑞,等.科尔沁沙地植被恢复演替进程中群落土壤种子库研究[J].生态学报,2005,25(12):3204-3211.

赵文智,白四明.科尔沁沙地围封草地种子库特征[J].中国沙漠,2001,21(2):204-208.

韩有志,王政权.两个林分水曲柳土壤种子库空间格局的定量比较[J].应用生态学报,2003,14(4):487-492.

Butler B J, Chazdon R L. Species richness, spatial variation, and abundance of the soil seed bank of a secondary tropical rain Forest1 [J]. Biotropica, 1998,30(2):214-222.

张慕华,陈学林,崔治家,等.甘肃金塔野生植物资源调查[J].安徽农业科学,2010,38(28):15812-15813,15817

马全林,卢琦,魏林源,等.干旱荒漠白刺灌丛植被演替过程土壤种子库变化特征[J].生态学报,2015,35(7):2285-2294.

鲁延芳,马力,占玉芳,等.河西走廊中部沙漠人工植被中土壤种子库特征[J].草业科学,2019,36(9):2334-2341.

占玉芳,马力,甄伟玲,等.河西走廊中部沙漠人工梭梭林土壤种子库特征[J].林业科技通讯,2019(9):54-58.

彭军,李旭光,董鸣,等.重庆四面山亚热带常绿阔叶林种子库研究[J].植物生态学报,2000,24(2):209-214.

杨小波,陈明智,吴庆书.热带地区不同土地利用系统土壤种子库的研究[J].土壤学报,1999,36(3):327-333.

王译梓,蒙朝阳,刘济明.不同林分下小蓬竹的群落土壤种子库[J].安徽农业科学,2008,36(7):2759-2761.

浏览量

829

下载量

CSCD

文章被引用时，请邮件提醒。

提交

工具集

关联资源

喀斯特石漠化生态治理区结构与物种多样性研究

黄土高原沟壑区人工植被类型对土壤水分和碳氮的影响

塔里木河下游土壤种子库的季节差异分析

塔里木河下游土壤种子库分布格局及其与环境因子的关系

兰州市北山无灌溉区植被恢复效益初步研究