1. 云南师范大学 旅游与地理科学学院,云南,昆明,650500
2. 西华师范大学 国土资源学院,四川,南充,637009
3. 中国西南地缘环境与边疆发展协同创新中心,云南,昆明,650500
纸质出版:2020
移动端阅览
王睿, 洪菊花, 骆华松, 等. 典型生态脆弱区生态环境与贫困耦合分析——以四川省藏区为例[J]. 水土保持通报, 2020,40(3):125-132.
Wang Rui, Hong Juhua, Luo Huasong, et al. Coupling Analysis of Ecological Environment and Poverty in Typical Ecologically Fragile Area -A Case Study in Tibetan Area, Sichuan Province[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2020, 40(3): 125-132.
王睿, 洪菊花, 骆华松, 等. 典型生态脆弱区生态环境与贫困耦合分析——以四川省藏区为例[J]. 水土保持通报, 2020,40(3):125-132. DOI: 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2020.03.018.
Wang Rui, Hong Juhua, Luo Huasong, et al. Coupling Analysis of Ecological Environment and Poverty in Typical Ecologically Fragile Area -A Case Study in Tibetan Area, Sichuan Province[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2020, 40(3): 125-132. DOI: 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2020.03.018.
[目的] 开展生态环境与贫困的耦合分析,为生态脆弱区的精准扶贫和可持续发展提供科学建议。[方法] 以典型生态脆弱区——四川省藏区为例,采用耦合度与耦合协调度模型,对2008—2017年四川省藏区生态环境与贫困耦合状况进行动态定量分析和测度。[结果] ①2008—2017年四川省藏区生态环境与贫困耦合发展呈现较低水平的平稳态势,耦合度数值维持在0.072 2~0.706 3之间,且表现逐年上升的变化趋势,2011年则波动下降。②2008—2017年四川省藏区生态环境指数呈逐年递增态势,数值维持在0.0295~1.000 0之间。且贫困指数也呈逐年增加趋势,数值维持在0.006 3~0.995 4之间,但2011年则波动下降。③除2011年波动下降外,2008—2017年四川省藏区生态环境与贫困耦合协调度呈逐年增加趋势,耦合协调度维持在0.035 9~0.839 4之间,且耦合协调度与耦合度变化趋势基本一致。④2008—2017年四川省藏区生态环境与贫困耦合协调度呈现低水平耦合发展、耦合过渡提升至高水平耦合协调贫困滞后3个不同阶段。[结论] 未来四川省藏区应以生态保护与贫困减缓为关键点和突破点,以实现生态脆弱区社会经济和环境系统的可持续发展。
[Objective] The relationship of the ecological environment and poverty was studied to provide scientific reference for the targeted poverty alleviation and sustainable development in ecologically fragile areas.[Methods] A typical ecologically fragile area
the Tibetan area in Sichuan Province
was taken as the study area. The coupling status of the ecological environment and poverty in the Sichuan Tibetan area was measured and analyzed by using a coupling degree model and coordination degree model from 2008 to 2017.[Results] ① The coupled development of the ecological environment and poverty in the Tibetan area was relatively stable at a low level from 2008 to 2017
and the coupling degree was mostly between 0.072 2 and 0.706 3. The variation trend of the coupling degree increased annually
but there were fluctuations in 2011. ② From 2008 to 2017
the ecological environment index of the Tibetan area showed an increasing trend annually
with a value between 0.009 5 and 1.000 0. The poverty index also showed an increasing trend annually
with a value between 0.006 3 and 0.995 4
but there was a fluctuation in 2011. ③ In addition to the fluctuation in 2011
the coupling coordination degree of the ecological environment and poverty in the Tibetan area increased annually from 2008 to 2017
and the value was between 0.035 9 and 0.839 4. The variation trends of coupling degrees and coordination degrees were similar from 2008 to 2017. ④ From 2008 to 2017
the coupling and coordination degree between the ecological environment and poverty of the Tibetan area had three different stages:low-level coupling development
coupling transition
and high-level coupling coordination of poverty lag.[Conclusion] In the future
ecological protection and poverty alleviation should be regarded as essential in the Tibetan area of Sichuan Province to achieve sustainable development of socio-economic and environment system in this ecologically fragile region.
程晓宇,陈志钢,张莉.农村持久多维贫困测量与分析:基于贵州普定县三个行政村2004—2017年的普查数据[J].中国人口·资源与环境,2019,29(7):140-148.
张怀英,杨安华,杨瑾.跨界治理:连片特困地区区域发展与扶贫攻坚的新挑战和新应对[J].新疆师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2019,40(4):108-116.
刘宥延,巩建锋,段淇斌.甘肃少数民族地区生态环境与农牧民贫困的关系及反贫困对策[J].草业科学,2014,31(8):1580-1586.
葛珺沂.西部少数民族地区贫困脆弱性研究[J].经济问题探索,2013(8):163-170.
庄天慧,张海霞,傅新红.少数民族地区村级发展环境对贫困人口返贫的影响分析:基于四川、贵州、重庆少数民族地区67个村的调查[J].农业技术经济,2011(2):41-49.
李靖,廖和平.区域贫困农户生计能力与生态环境的关系:以重庆市16个区县为例[J].中国农业资源与区划,2018,39(9):175-182.
屈明,倪九派,彭静耘,等.老库区反贫困与生态环境的可持续性:以四川省大洪河水库邻水县库区为例[J].生态学报,2006,26(12):4225-4233.
刘七军,李昭楠.生态脆弱区精准脱贫的现实困境与政策选择[J].北方民族大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2019(5):60-66.
马骏,李昌晓,魏虹,等.三峡库区生态脆弱性评价[J].生态学报,2015,35(21):7117-7129.
张露凝.黄河三角洲湿地生态环境脆弱性评价及演变特性研究[D].郑州:华北水利水电大学,2017.
Tuya A, Jirigala B R, Yin Bao. Research on the classification of coupling relationship among the ecological environment, natural disasters and regional poverty in Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region [J]. Applied Mechanics and Materials, 2012,260/261:1063-1068.
Admassie A, Abebaw D. Rural Poverty and Marginalization in Ethiopia: A Review of Development Interventions [M]// von Braun J, Gatzweiler F W. Marginality: Addressing the Nexus of Poverty, Exclusion and Ecology, Dordrecht: Springer, 2014.
徐满厚,杨晓艳,张潇月,等.山西吕梁连片特困区生态环境质量评价及其经济贫困的时空分布特征[J].江苏农业科学,2018,46(6):304-309.
王淑强,董锁成,王新,等.定西市经济与生态环境互动机理研究[J].资源科学,2005,27(4):106-111.
李静怡,王艳慧.吕梁地区生态环境质量与经济贫困的空间耦合特征[J].应用生态学报,2014,25(6):1715-1724.
李传华,赵军.基于GIS的民勤县生态环境脆弱性演化研究[J].中国沙漠,2013,33(1):302-307.
杨帆,庄天慧,阚杰,等. 四川省藏区县域经济社会发展评价研究[J]. 贵州民族研究,2015,36(9):170-173.
李治兵,舒莉,赵睿祥,等.生态环境保护与农业精准扶贫协调发展机制研究:以四川省藏区为例[J].阿坝师范学院学报,2019,36(2):51-57.
卢冲,耿宝江,庄天慧,等.藏区贫困农牧民参与旅游扶贫的意愿及行为研究:基于四川省藏区23县(市)1320户的调查[J].旅游学刊,2017,32(1):64-76.
丛晓男.耦合度模型的形式、性质及在地理学中的若干误用[J].经济地理,2019,39(4):18-25.
杜英.黄土丘陵区退耕还林生态系统耦合效应研究:以安塞县为例[D].陕西 杨凌:西北农林科技大学,2008.
李涛,廖和平,杨伟,等.重庆市“土地、人口、产业”城镇化质量的时空分异及耦合协调性[J].经济地理,2015,35(5):65-71.
牛亚琼,王生林. 甘肃省脆弱生态环境与贫困的耦合关系[J].生态学报,2017,37(19):6431-6439.
0
浏览量
1210
下载量
5
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010802024621