滇东岩溶山地不同类型云南松林地土壤团聚体稳定性差异

方薇; 范弢

doi:10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2020.03.014

您当前的位置：

首页 >

文章列表页 >

滇东岩溶山地不同类型云南松林地土壤团聚体稳定性差异

试验研究

- 滇东岩溶山地不同类型云南松林地土壤团聚体稳定性差异
- Differences in Soil Aggregate Stability of Different Species of Pinus Yunnanensis in Karst Mountain Area of Eastern Yunnan Province
- 水土保持通报 2020年40卷第3期页码：95-102
- 作者机构：
  
  1. 云南师范大学旅游与地理科学学院,云南,昆明,650500
  2. 云南省高原地理过程与环境变化重点实验室,云南,昆明,650500
- 作者简介：
- 基金信息：
  
  国家自然科学基金项目“滇东岩溶高原云南松水源林产水功能恢复机理研究”（41661004）
- DOI：10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2020.03.014
  中图分类号： S152.4
- 纸质出版：2020
- 稿件说明：
移动端阅览
方薇, 范弢. 滇东岩溶山地不同类型云南松林地土壤团聚体稳定性差异[J]. 水土保持通报, 2020,40(3):95-102.

Fang Wei, Fan Tao. Differences in Soil Aggregate Stability of Different Species of Pinus Yunnanensis in Karst Mountain Area of Eastern Yunnan Province[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2020, 40(3): 95-102.
方薇, 范弢. 滇东岩溶山地不同类型云南松林地土壤团聚体稳定性差异[J]. 水土保持通报, 2020,40(3):95-102. DOI： 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2020.03.014.

Fang Wei, Fan Tao. Differences in Soil Aggregate Stability of Different Species of Pinus Yunnanensis in Karst Mountain Area of Eastern Yunnan Province[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2020, 40(3): 95-102. DOI： 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2020.03.014.

摘要

[目的

]

研究滇东岩溶山地不同类型云南松林地土壤团聚体稳定性差异，为岩溶脆弱生境土壤培肥、质量提升、水土固持提供依据。[方法

]

通过野外调查和室内分析，研究了滇东岩溶山地云南松纯林、云南松人工混交林、云南松天然混交林、灌丛和原生林5种植被类型水稳性团聚体及团聚体有机碳分布特征，揭示不同类型云南松林团聚体稳定性差异。[结果

]

①云南松纯林、人工混交林和天然混交林的

0.25 mm粒径质量分数（5.77%~9.39%）显著低于灌丛（20.92%）和原生林（27.47%）（p

0.05），且人工混交林和天然混交林>5 mm，2~5 mm粒径质量分数高于纯林。②湿筛处理的>0.25 mm水稳性团聚体比例（R

0.25

）排序为：人工混交林 > 天然混交林 > 纯林>灌丛 > 原生林；平均重量直径（MWD）排序为：人工混交林 > 天然混交林 > 原生林 > 灌丛 > 纯林；几何平均直径（GMD）排序为：人工混交林 > 天然混交林 > 原生林 > 纯林 > 灌丛；分形维数（D）排序为：原生林 > 灌丛 > 纯林 > 天然混交林 > 人工混交林。③纯林、人工混交林、天然混交林的大粒级团聚体（>0.25 mm）对土壤有机碳的贡献率高于小粒级团聚体（

0.25 mm），且>5，2~5，

0.25 mm粒径水稳性土壤团聚体有机碳含量均显著小于灌丛、原生林（p

0.05）。[结论

]

云南松人工混交林的土壤团聚体稳定性最高，其养分积累和固碳能力低于灌丛和原生林，高于纯林，作为该区域水土保持的主要植被类型时需要避免人为干扰以提高土壤养分。

Abstract

[Objective] The soil aggregate stability of different species of Pinus yunnanensis in the karst mountain area of Eastern Yunnan Province was studied to provide a basis for soil cultivation

quality improvement

and soil-water conservation of karst fragile habitats.[Methods] Based on the field survey and laboratory analysis

five types of vegetation

namely P. yunnanensis pure forest

P. yunnanensis artificial mixed forest

P. yunnanensis natural mixed forest

shrub

and primeval forest

in the karst mountains of Eastern Yunnan Province were studied in terms of their characteristics of water-stable aggregate and organic carbon distribution in aggregate

which revealed the differences in the soil aggregate stability of different species of P. yunnanensis.[Results] ① The mass fraction of particle size <0.25 mm (5.77%~9.39%) of P. yunnanensis pure forest

artificial mixed forest

and natural mixed forest was significantly lower than that of shrub (20.92%) and primeval forest (27.47%) (p<0.05). The mass fraction of particle size >5 mm and 2~5 mm of artificial mixed forest and natural mixed forest was higher than that of pure forest. ② The proportion order of water-stable aggregate >0.25 mm (R0.25) after wet sieving treatment was P. yunnanensis artificial mixed forest > P. yunnanensis natural mixed forest > P. yunnanensis pure forest > shrub > primeval forest. The mean weight diameter order was P. yunnanensis artificial mixed forest > P. yunnanensis natural mixed forest > primeval forest > shrub > P. yunnanensis pure forest. The geometric mean diameter order was P. yunnanensis artificial mixed forest > P. yunnanensis natural mixed forest > primeval forest > P. yunnanensis pure forest > shrub. The fractal dimension order was primeval forest > shrub > P. yunnanensis pure forest > P. yunnanensis natural mixed forest > P. yunnanensis artificial mixed forest. ③ The contribution rate of large aggregates (>0.25 mm) of P. yunnanensis pure forest

P. yunnanensis artificial mixed forest

and P. yunnanensis natural mixed forest to soil organic carbon was higher than that of small aggregates (<0.25 mm)

and the content of organic carbon in soil aggregates with particle sizes of 5

2~5

and <0.25 mm was significantly lower than that of shrub and primeval forest (p<0.05).[Conclusion] P. yunnanensis artificial mixed forest was observed to have the maximum soil aggregate stability

and its nutrient accumulation and carbon sequestration were lower than those of shrub and primeval forest but higher than those of pure forest. When the P. yunnanensis artificial mixed forest was planted as the main vegetation type for soil and water conservation in this region

it was necessary to avoid human interference for the purpose of improvement of soil nutrients.

关键词

Keywords

references

胡阳,邓艳,蒋忠诚,等.典型岩溶山区植被恢复对土壤团聚体分布及稳定性的影响[J].水土保持通报,2015,35(1):61-67.

Six J, Bossuyt H, Degryze S, et al. A history of research on the link between (micro) aggregates, soil biota, and soil organic matter dynamics [J]. Soil & Tillage Research, 2004,79(1):7-31.

Tisdall J M, Oades J M. Organic matter and water-stable aggregates in soils [J]. European Journal of Soil Science, 1982,33(2):141-163.

孙涛,刘艺杉,孙崇玉,等.石灰岩山地植被恢复对土壤水稳性团聚体的影响[J].草业科学,2018,35(6):1361-1367.

李小刚.甘肃景电灌区土壤团聚体特征研究[J].土壤学报,2000,37(2):263-270.

Edwards A P, Bremner J M. Microaggregates in soils [J]. Journal of Soil Science, 1967,18(1):64-73.

Colazo J C, Buschiazzo D E. Soil dry aggregate stability and wind erodible fraction in a semiarid environment of Argentina [J]. Geoderma, 2010,159(1):228-236.

孙筱璐,唐佐芯,尤业明,等.气候和林分类型对土壤团聚体有机碳的影响[J].广西植物,2018,38(3):341-351.

刘晓利,何园球.不同利用方式和开垦年限下红壤水稳性团聚体及养分变化研究[J].土壤,2009,41(1):84-89.

姚贤良,许绣云.于德芬.不同利用方式下红壤结构的形成[J].土壤学报,1990,27(1):25-33.

卢凌霄,宋同清,彭晚霞,等.喀斯特峰丛洼地原生林土壤团聚体有机碳的剖面分布[J].应用生态学报,2012,23(5):1167-1174.

Elliott E T. Aggregate structure and carbon, nitrogen, and phosphorus in native and cultivated soils [J]. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 1986,50(3):627-633.

王进,刘子琦,鲍恩俣,等.喀斯特石漠化区林草恢复对土壤团聚体及其有机碳含量的影响[J].水土保持学报,2019,33(6):249-256.

谭秋锦,宋同清,彭晚霞,等.峡谷型喀斯特不同生态系统土壤团聚体稳定性及有机碳特征[J].应用生态学报,2014,25(3):671-678.[15] 黄宗胜,符裕红,喻理飞,等.喀斯特森林植被自然恢复中土壤团聚体有机碳含量与团聚体分形特征[J].林业科学研究,2015,28(2):277-283. [16] 苗娟,周传艳,李世杰,等.不同林龄云南松林土壤有机碳和全氮积累特征[J].应用生态学报,2014,25(3):625-631. [17] 刘文耀,刘伦辉,郑征,等.滇中常绿阔叶林及云南松林水文作用的初步研究[J].植物生态学与地植物学学报,1991,15(2):159-167. [18] 刘文耀,刘伦辉,荆桂芬,等.云南松林与常绿阔叶林中枯落叶分解研究[J].云南植物研究,2000,22(3):298-306. [19] 廖周瑜,惠阳,王邵军,等.不同林龄云南松凋落叶分解及养分归还特征[J].生态环境学报,2018,27(11):1981-1986. [20] 杨培岭,罗远培,石元春.用粒径的重量分布表征的土壤分形特征[J].科学通报,1993,38(20):1896-1899. [21] 方华军,杨学明,张晓平,等.东北黑土区坡耕地表层土壤颗粒有机碳和团聚体结合碳的空间分布[J].生态学报,2006,26(9):2847-2854. [22] Kgel-Knabner I. The macromolecular organic composition of plant and microbial residues as inputs to soil organic matter [J]. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 2002,34(2):139-162. [23] Derenne S, Largeau C. A review of some important families of refractory macromolecules: Composition, origin, and fate in soils and sediments [J]. Soil Science, 2001,166(11):833-847. [24] 俞月凤,卢凌霄,杜虎,等.不同类型森林石灰土的团聚体组成及其有机碳分布特征[J].西北植物学报,2013,33(5):1011-1019. [25] 万海霞,马璠,许浩,等.宁夏南部黄土丘陵区典型草本群落根系垂直分布特征与土壤团聚体的关系[J].水土保持研究,2019,26(6):80-86. [26] 孟广涛,方向京,李贵祥,等.云南金沙江流域不同植被类型水源涵养能力分析[J].水土保持研究,2007,14(4):160-163. [27] Six J, Elliott E T, Paustian K. Soil structure and soil organic matter (Ⅱ): A normalized stability index and the effect of mineralogy [J]. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 2000,64(3):1042-1049.

浏览量

1368

下载量

CSCD

文章被引用时，请邮件提醒。

提交

工具集

关联资源

成土母质和土地利用方式对典型红壤抗蚀性的影响

香椿人工林土壤抗蚀性研究

短期放牧对高寒草甸土壤水稳性团聚体构成及稳定性的影响

不同水稳性团聚体测定方法的对比研究

盐分积累对设施土壤电化学性质和水稳性团聚体影响的模拟研究