冀西北地区不同生态系统枯落物的水文效应

潘天石; 左丽君; 张增祥; 赵晓丽; 孙菲菲; 朱自娟

doi:10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2020.03.008

您当前的位置：

首页 >

文章列表页 >

冀西北地区不同生态系统枯落物的水文效应

试验研究

- 冀西北地区不同生态系统枯落物的水文效应
- Hydrological Effects of Litters in Different Ecosystems in Northwestern Hebei Province
- 水土保持通报 2020年40卷第3期页码：50-55
- 作者机构：
  
  中国科学院遥感与数字地球研究所,北京市,100020
- 作者简介：
- 基金信息：
  
  国家科技重大专项“张家口地区水源涵养功能保持与生态空间优化总体方案研究”（2017ZX07101001-05）
- DOI：10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2020.03.008
  中图分类号： Q146;S715
- 纸质出版：2020
- 稿件说明：
移动端阅览
潘天石, 左丽君, 张增祥, 等. 冀西北地区不同生态系统枯落物的水文效应[J]. 水土保持通报, 2020,40(3):50-55.

Pan Tianshi, Zuo Lijun, Zhang Zengxiang, et al. Hydrological Effects of Litters in Different Ecosystems in Northwestern Hebei Province[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2020, 40(3): 50-55.
潘天石, 左丽君, 张增祥, 等. 冀西北地区不同生态系统枯落物的水文效应[J]. 水土保持通报, 2020,40(3):50-55. DOI： 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2020.03.008.

Pan Tianshi, Zuo Lijun, Zhang Zengxiang, et al. Hydrological Effects of Litters in Different Ecosystems in Northwestern Hebei Province[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2020, 40(3): 50-55. DOI： 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2020.03.008.

摘要

[目的

]

揭示不同植被生态系统枯落物水文效应的差异，为张家口地区生态空间格局优化提供支撑。[方法

]

基于样地调查和统计分析方法，分别对冀西北地区张家口市森林、农田和草地3种生态系统的枯落物在生长季末期持水能力及其与生物量之间的关系进行分析。[结果

]

①森林生态系统枯落物的最大持水量（30.7t/hm

）、有效拦蓄量（22.97t/hm

）、有效拦蓄率（187.49%）和吸水速率（5.84g/h）4个指标均优于其他两类生态系统。②草地枯落物的各项水文指标均值皆高于农田，最大持水率甚至高于森林生态系统。③枯落物生物量与其最大持水量和有效拦蓄量呈显著正相关关系，而枯落物占生态系统总生物量的比例随总生物量增加呈幂数下降。[结论

]

如果造林营林方式正确，森林生态系统能够提升区域水源涵养水平，同时草地的水源涵养能力不容忽视，市域内大范围的耕地向草地扩展，将直接影响区域的水源涵养能力。以生物量表征的生态系统固碳能力与枯落物蓄水所反映的水源涵养能力之间的响应关系在生态系统不同尺度下具有不同的表现，在对区域生态空间格局进行优化时，需明确特定环境下不同生态系统类型枯落物的水源涵养能力及其变化对其他生态服务功能的影响，从而实现各生态系统平衡发展。

Abstract

[Objective] The differences in hydrological effects of litters in different vegetation ecosystems were investigated to provide support for the optimization of the ecological spatial pattern in Zhangjiakou region.[Methods] Based on field investigation and statistical analysis

the water-holding capacities of litters at the end of the growing season of three ecosystems (forests

farmland

and grassland) in Zhangjiakou region and its relationship to ecosystem biomass were analyzed.[Results] ① The maximum water-holding capacity (30.7 t/hm2)

effective storage capacity (22.97 t/hm2)

effective interception rate (187.49%)

and water absorption rate (5.84 g/h) of forest ecosystem were superior to those of the other two types of ecosystems. ② The hydrological indicators of grassland were better than those of farmland. Its maximum water-holding capacity was higher than that of forests. ③ There was a significant positive correlation between litter biomass and its maximum water-holding capacity and effective storage capacity

whereas the proportion of litter in the total ecosystem biomass decreased with the increase in total biomass.[Conclusion] On condition that the afforestation method is appropriate

forest ecosystems could improve regional water conservation levels. Simultaneously

the water conservation capacity of grassland should not be ignored. The large-scale expansion of cultivated land in the city to grassland would directly affect the water conservation capacity of the region. In addition

the response relationship between the carbon sequestration capacity characterized by biomass and the water conservation capacity reflected by the litter storage had different performances at different scales of the ecosystem. When optimizing the regional ecological spatial pattern

it was necessary to clarify the water conservation capacity of litters in different ecosystem types at a specific scale

as well as its response to other ecological service functions

to achieve balanced development of each ecosystem.

关键词

Keywords

references

Facelli J M, Pickett S T A. Plant litter: Its dynamics and effects on plant community structure [J]. The Botanical Review, 1991,57(1):1-32.

Jensen K, Gutekunst K. Effects of litter on establishment of grassland plant species: The role of seed size and successional status [J]. Basic and Applied Ecology, 2003,4(6):579-587.

施爽,郭继勋.松嫩草原三种主要植物群落枯落物层生态水文功能[J].应用生态学报,2007,18(8):1722-1726.

魏强,凌雷,张广忠,等.甘肃兴隆山主要森林类型凋落物累积量及持水特性[J].应用生态学报,2011,22(10):2589-2598. [5] 曲杭峰,董希斌,张甜,等.大兴安岭白桦低质林补植改造后枯落物水文效应变化[J].东北林业大学学报,2017,45(8):14-19. [6] 庞梦丽,朱辰光,翟博超,等.河北省太行山区3种人工水土保持林枯落物及土壤水文效应[J].水土保持通报,2017,37(1):51-56. [7] 黄岩,剪文灏,黄永辉,等.冀北山地落叶松林枯落物层水文效应研究[J].防护林科技,2017(9):14-17. [8] Beasley R S, Granillo A B. Soil protection by natural vegetation on clearcut forest land in Arkansas [J]. Journal of soil and Water Conservation (USA), 1985,40(4):379-382. [9] 胡静霞,杨新兵,朱辰光,等.冀西北地区4种纯林枯落物及土壤水文效应[J].水土保持研究,2017,24(4):304-310. [10] 王安宁,蔺鑫,穆枫,等.冀北木兰围场沙荒坡地不同坡位黄柳沙障内枯落物的持水性能[J].北京林业大学学报,2018,40(1):98-107. [11] 王忠禹,刘国彬,王兵,等.黄土丘陵区典型植物枯落物凋落动态及其持水性[J].生态学报,2019,39(7):2416-2425. [12] 田耀武,黄志霖,肖文发,等.三峡库区防护林林分结构特征与径流、泥沙输出的关系[J].西北林学院学报,2018,33(5):44-50. [13] 刘泽彬,王彦辉,邓秀秀,等.六盘山华北落叶松林下穿透雨空间变异特征[J].生态学报,2017,37(10):3471-3481. [14] 胡淑萍,余新晓,岳永杰.北京百花山森林枯落物层和土壤层水文效应研究[J].水土保持学报,2008,22(1):146-150. [15] 剪文灏,李淑春,陈波,等.冀北山区三种典型森林类型枯落物水文效应研究[J].水土保持研究,2011,18(5):144-147.

浏览量

822

下载量

CSCD

文章被引用时，请邮件提醒。

提交

工具集

关联资源

太岳山不同郁闭度油松人工林枯落物及土壤水文效应

黄土高原水蚀风蚀交错区沙地枯落物的水源涵养功能

红壤侵蚀区几种水土保持林水文效应研究

老秃顶子自然保护区不同森林类型土壤贮水与入渗特征研究

子午岭林区辽东栎、油松、柴松群落特征及其枯枝落叶层水文效应研究