1. 云南师范大学 旅游与地理科学学院,云南,昆明,650500
2. 西华师范大学 国土资源学院,四川,南充,637009
3. 中国西南地缘环境与边疆发展协同创新中心,云南,昆明,650500
纸质出版:2020
移动端阅览
王睿, 洪菊花, 骆华松. 水土流失地区精准扶贫政策对农户幸福指数的影响[J]. 水土保持通报, 2020,40(2):263-268.
Wang Rui, Hong Juhua, Luo Huasong. Impacts of Targeted Poverty Alleviation Policy on Happiness Index of Farmers in Soil Erosion Areas[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2020, 40(2): 263-268.
王睿, 洪菊花, 骆华松. 水土流失地区精准扶贫政策对农户幸福指数的影响[J]. 水土保持通报, 2020,40(2):263-268. DOI: 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2020.02.038.
Wang Rui, Hong Juhua, Luo Huasong. Impacts of Targeted Poverty Alleviation Policy on Happiness Index of Farmers in Soil Erosion Areas[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2020, 40(2): 263-268. DOI: 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2020.02.038.
[目的] 研究水土流失地区精准扶贫政策对农户幸福指数的影响,为贫困地区可持续发展提供科学参考。[方法] 通过构建农户幸福指数评价指标体系,采取熵值法与加权求和模型对精准扶贫政策影响下的云南省双柏县农户幸福指数进行评价。[结果] 在农户幸福指数评价指标的权重中,排在前3位的分别是人均可支配收入、婚姻满意度、生态环境满意度评价指标;双柏县大多数农户对精准扶贫工作认同度较高,总体满意度平均值为67.55分,但是各乡镇农户对政策感知差异较大。收入增减满意度、政策后果满意度、政策宣传满意度是影响双柏县农户对精准扶贫政策总体满意度的关键因素;双柏县农户幸福指数的平均值为65.64分,各乡镇农户幸福指数差异较小,基本维持在59~71分之间。[结论] 未来双柏县应以提升农户幸福感和减缓贫困为关键点和突破点,通过精准扶贫政策实现水土流失地区可持续发展。
[Objective] The impacts of targeted poverty alleviation policies on the happiness index of farmers in soil erosion areas were studied
in order to provide a scientific reference for sustainable development in poverty area.[Methods] The assessment index system of farmers' happiness index at Shuangbai County of Yunan Province was established
and entropy method and weighted summation model were used to evaluate the farmers' happiness index under the influence of targeted poverty alleviation policies.[Results] Per capita disposable income
marriage satisfaction and ecological environment satisfaction were the top there among the farmers' happiness index evaluation indicators. Most of farmers had a higher degree of recognition for targeted poverty alleviation
with an average satisfaction of 67.55 points. However
there were significant differences in the perception of policy among farmers. The satisfaction of income increase and decrease
policy consequence
and policy promotion were the key factors affecting the overall satisfaction of farmers in Shuangbai County with regard to targeted poverty alleviation policies. The average happiness index of farmers in Shuangbai County was 65.64 points
and the difference in happiness index of farmers in each township was relatively small
which maintained between 59~71 points.[Conclusion] In the future
farmers' happiness improvement and poverty alleviation should be regarded as the key breakthrough point in Shuangbai County
and targeted poverty alleviation policies would promote sustainable development in poverty area.
王琳.中国扶贫开发的理论演进、实践发展与思路创新[J].宏观经济研究,2018,12(1):75-81.
Yoshikawa H, Aber J L, Beardslee W R. The effects of poverty on the mental, emotional, and behavioral health of children and youth:implications for prevention[J]. American Psychologist, 2012,67(4):22-27.
Ravallion M. How long will it take to lift one billion people out of poverty?[J]. The World Bank Research Observer, 2013,28(2):139-158.
李昱.十八大以来党的扶贫政策、实践与启示[D].北京:中国青年政治学院,2017.
王怡,周晓唯.精准脱贫与2020年我国全面建成小康社会:基于2010-2017年扶贫经验的理论和实证分析[J].陕西师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2018,47(6):48-57.
胡薇.贵州脱贫攻坚成效研究:基于幸福指数[J].赤峰学院学报(汉文哲学社会科学版),2019,40(11):61-63.
狄国忠.增强贫困群众获得感幸福感安全感的内在逻辑与实现机制[J].宁夏党校学报,2019,35(3):119-124.
刘兆隆,范雪白,杨清灵,等.居民幸福感和乡村旅游精准扶贫之间关系的理论框架构建[J].中国商贸,2017,15(13):42-44.
戴宇婷.基于精准扶贫政策下农民幸福感的提升[J].现代营销:学苑版,2018,15(1):196-197.
曹大宇.西部地区农村居民幸福感影响因素分析:基于贵州、重庆和甘肃三省市调查数据的实证研究[J].西部经济管理论坛,2016,27(1):45-51.
熊彩云,孟荣钊,史亚峰.我国农民幸福指数的实证研究[J].农业经济问题2014,23(12):35-42,112.
李想,李秉龙,张恒春.我国不同经济发展水平地区农村居民生活幸福感的影响因素研究[J].技术经济,2009,29(5):100-105.
胡洪曙,鲁元平.公共支出与农民主观幸福感:基于CGSS数据的实证分析[J].财贸经济,2012,21(10):25-35,124.
童绍玉,蔡运龙,李双成.云南省楚雄市与双柏县土地利用变化对比研究[J].地理研究,2006,25(3):397-405.
程国栋,徐中民,徐进祥.建立中国国民幸福生活核算体系的构想[J].地理学报,2005,60(6):883-893.
曾庆捷,牛乙钦.乡村治理中的产业扶贫模式及其绩效评估[J].南开学报(哲学社会科学版),2019,12(4):87-96.
周旗,郁耀闯.关中地区公众气候变化感知的时空变异[J].地理研究,2009,28(1):47-56.
0
浏览量
1280
下载量
0
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010802024621