1. 北京林业大学 林学院,北京,100083
2. 天津绿茵景观生态建设股份有限公司,天津,300384
3. 西华师范大学 环境科学与工程学院,四川,南充,637009
纸质出版:2020
移动端阅览
车飞伟, 李素艳, 孙向阳, 等. 不同有机材料覆盖对土壤保水效果的影响[J]. 水土保持通报, 2020,40(2):182-187.
Che Feiwei, LI Suyan, Sun Xiangyang, et al. Effects of Different Organic Materials Mulching on Moisture Holding Capacity of Soil[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2020, 40(2): 182-187.
车飞伟, 李素艳, 孙向阳, 等. 不同有机材料覆盖对土壤保水效果的影响[J]. 水土保持通报, 2020,40(2):182-187. DOI: 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2020.02.026.
Che Feiwei, LI Suyan, Sun Xiangyang, et al. Effects of Different Organic Materials Mulching on Moisture Holding Capacity of Soil[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2020, 40(2): 182-187. DOI: 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2020.02.026.
[目的
]
研究不同有机材料覆盖对土壤水分蒸发量、土壤含水量的影响,并筛选出保水效果最佳的材料。[方法
]
以木片、树皮及经过堆腐的园林废弃物为研究对象,进行模拟蒸发及桶装控制试验。[结果
]
不同粒径的园林废弃物覆盖均能降低土壤水分日蒸发量,日蒸发量从大到小依次为CK,3~5 cm粒径(M
3
)、0~1 cm粒径(M
1
)、1~3 cm粒径(M
2
)。在连续蒸发14 d后,M
2
,M
1
,M
3
和CK的土壤水分累积蒸发量分别为193.0,269.5,304.0和1 037.0 g,与CK相比,分别减少了81.4%,74.0%,70.7%;不同有机材料覆盖均能提高土壤含水量。除了雨季之外,不同土层土壤含水量从高到低依次表现为:木片覆盖(M
4
) > 树皮覆盖(M
5
) > 1~3 cm粒径园林废弃物覆盖(M
2
) > CK。土壤含水量的年变化整体呈现出双峰趋势,一年中4-5月含水量较低,6-8月含水量较高,不同土层土壤含水量的年变化趋势基本一致。M
4
,M
5
,M
2
和CK的0-40 cm土层土壤年平均含水量分别为32.9%,30.3%,27.4%,26.8%。[结论
]
木片为保水效果最好的有机材料,其次是树皮和园林废弃物。
[Objective] Mulching effects of different organic materials on evaporation and soil moisture content were studied to identify the best material for moisture retention.[Methods] The simulated evaporation analyses were conducted with garden waste in various particle sizes (M1:0~1 cm
M2:1~3 cm
M3:3~5 cm). In addition the barrel control experiments were carried out with M2
wood chips (M4)
and bark (M5).[Results] Garden waste in various particle sizes could reduce daily evaporation of soil moisture. After 14 days of continuous evaporation
the cumulative evaporation capacity of M2 (1~3 cm in size)
M1 (0~1 cm)
M3 (3~5 cm) and CK (control) were 193.0
269.5
304.0 and 1 037.0 g
respectively
which were 81.4%
74.0% and 70.7% lower than those of CK. The soil moisture content of different layers were increased by covering with different organic materials
except for the rainy season
which were wood chips (M4)
bark (M5) and garden waste (M2) from high to low. The annual change of soil moisture content under various mulching layers showed a similar bimodal trend
with a low soil moisture content in the period from April to May while a high soil moisture content in the period from June to August. The annual average of soil moisture content within the 0-40 cm soil layer of M4
M5
M2 and CK were 32.9%
30.3%
27.4%
and 26.8%
respectively.[Conclusion] Wood chips are the best materials for moisture conservation
followed by bark and garden waste.
李曙雁.生态城市建设存在的问题及对策[J].中共银川市委党校学报,2011,13(2):56-58.
袁嘉祖.节水园林势在必行[J].中国园林,2003,19(9):44-46.
张艳,阚丽艳.有机覆盖物对城市园林植物土壤含水量的影响[J].江西农业学报,2013,25(8):30-34.
陈玉娟,王成,郄光发,等.有机覆盖物对城市绿地土壤水分和温度的影响[J].中国城市林业,2009(3):52-54.
赵文举,马宏,郁文,等.不同覆盖模式对土壤水分蒸发的影响[J].排灌机械工程报,2016,34(6):539-544.
于舜章,陈雨海,周勋波,等.冬小麦期覆盖秸秆对夏玉米土壤水分动态变化及产量的影响[J].水土保持学报,2004,18(6):175-178.
Hadrian F C, Gerardo S B Valdes, Howard C L. Mulch effects on rainfall interception, soil physical characteristics and temperature under
Zea mays
L.[J]. Soil & Tillage Research, 2005,91(1):227-235.
黄利斌,李荣锦,王成.国外城市有机地表覆盖物应用研究概况[J].林业科技开发,2008(6):1-8.
孙博,解建仓,汪妮,等.不同秸秆覆盖量对盐渍土蒸发、水盐变化的影响[J].水土保持学报,2012,26(1):246-250.
孙博,解建仓,汪妮,等.秸秆覆盖对盐渍化土壤水盐影响的试验研究[J].水土保持通报,2011,31(3):48-51.
王平,郭小俊,张丽娟,等.不同覆盖方式对小麦产量和土壤水热状况的影响[J].水土保持通报,2017,37(5):69-75.
王安,郝明德,王荚文.人工降雨条件下秸秆覆盖及留茬的水土保持效应[J].水土保持通报,2012,32(2):26-28,34.
段义忠,亢福仁.不同覆盖材料对旱地马铃薯土壤水热状况及其水分利用效率的影响[J].水土保持通报,2014,34(5):55-59,66.
陈玉华,张岁岐,田海燕,等.地膜覆盖及施用有机肥对地温及冬小麦水分利用的影响[J].水土保持通报,2010,30(3):59-63.
苏凤梅,贾志峰,王智.地布-地膜覆盖对渭北旱塬区土壤水分的影响[J].水土保持通报,2018,38(5):97-102.
赵丹,李毅,冯浩.砂石条形覆盖下土壤水分蒸发动态研究[J].土壤学报,2015,52(5):1058-1068.
蔡永坤,李毅,冯浩.不同砂石覆盖度和粒径对土壤水分蒸发的影响[J].水土保持学报,2014,28(6):273-277,297.
原翠萍,张心平,雷廷武,等.砂石覆盖粒径对土壤蒸发的影响[J].农业工程学报,2008,24(7):25-28.
于鑫,孙向阳,徐佳,等.北京市园林绿化废弃物现状调查及再利用对策探讨[J].山东林业科技,2009,39(4):5-7,11.
陈玉娟.有机覆盖物对城市绿地土壤的影响[D].北京:中国林业科学研究院,2009.
0
浏览量
898
下载量
7
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010802024621