1. 中国科学院 教育部水土保持与生态环境研究中心, 陕西 杨凌,712100
2. 中国科学院大学,北京,100049
3. 同济大学 海洋与地球科学学院,上海,200092
4. 西北农林科技大学 资源环境学院, 陕西 杨凌,712100
5. 西北农林科技大学 水土保持研究所, 陕西 杨凌,712100
纸质出版:2020
移动端阅览
苏媛, 高小宝, 张锐, 等. 关中地区农村典型涝池水体污染物特征及其水质现状调查与分析[J]. 水土保持通报, 2020,40(1):256-261.
Su Yuan, Gao Xiaobao, Zhang Rui, et al. Water Pollutant Characteristics and Water Quality Status of Typical Water Storage Ponds in Guanzhong Rural Area[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2020, 40(1): 256-261.
苏媛, 高小宝, 张锐, 等. 关中地区农村典型涝池水体污染物特征及其水质现状调查与分析[J]. 水土保持通报, 2020,40(1):256-261. DOI: 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2020.01.037.
Su Yuan, Gao Xiaobao, Zhang Rui, et al. Water Pollutant Characteristics and Water Quality Status of Typical Water Storage Ponds in Guanzhong Rural Area[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2020, 40(1): 256-261. DOI: 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2020.01.037.
[目的] 探究影响涝池水体水环境质量的主要原因,以期能为涝池水体水环境保护和水质状况改善提供科学依据。[方法] 从涝池的功能、容量、面积和结构等方面出发,选取陕西省杨凌农业高新技术产业示范区8个具有典型代表性的涝池,对涝池水体pH值、溶解氧、化学需氧量、氨氮、总磷、总氮进行测定,同时对水质样本点各污染物指标进行参数检验,并应用单因子指数等方法对其综合评定。[结果] ①点源污染型涝池在不同采样点位置水体污染物浓度差异显著(p<0.05),各涝池总氮、总磷平均浓度范围分别为:4.70~78.13 mg/L,0.03~4.27 mg/L;氨氮平均浓度范围为0.36~39.18 mg/L;化学需氧量平均浓度范围为33.0~1 067.40 mg/L;溶解氧平均浓度范围为1.5~7.3 mg/L;pH值大小平均值范围为7.85~8.64;②大部分涝池水体污染严重,水质均为劣Ⅴ类,污染物主要以氮类污染物指标为主;③调查区涝池水质污染程度排序为:点源污染+有措施 < 面源污染+无措施 < 点源污染+无措施。[结论] 布设污水处理设施及池底防渗措施对于改善涝池水环境状态较为重要。此外辅以内源水体的相关修复及管护工作,效果将会更好。
[Objective] The main factors affecting the water environmental quality of water storage ponds were explored to provide a scientific basis for water environmental protection and water quality improvement of water storage ponds.[Methods] Eight typical water storage ponds in Yangling Agricultural Hi-tech Industries Demonstration Zone of Shaanxi Province were selected
taking into consideration the function
capacity
area
and structure of the ponds. Six water quality indicators were measured:pH value
ammonia nitrogen (AN)
dissolved oxygen (DO)
chemical oxygen demand (COD)
NH4+-N
total nitrogen (TN)
and total phosphorus (TP). The multivariate statistical method and the single factor index were used to determine the variance of the pollutants in the water quality samples.[Results] ① The concentration of water pollutants in the water storage ponds was significantly different at different sampling points (p<0.05). The average TN and TP concentration in each pond was between 4.70~78.13 mg/L and 0.03~4.27 mg/L
respectively; The average NH4+-N concentration was between 0.36~39.18 mg/L; The average COD concentration was between 33.0~1 067.40 mg/L; The average DO concentration was between 1.5~7.3 mg/L; The average pH value was between 7.85~8.64; ② Most water storage ponds were seriously polluted. The water quality was inferior to the Ⅴ category
and the pollutants were mainly nitrogen-based. ③ The pollution levels of the water storage ponds in the survey area were:point source pollution + measures < non-point source pollution + no measures < point source pollution + no measures.[Conclusion] The installation of sewage treatment facilities and anti-seepage measures at the bottom of the pool were essential for improving the water environment of the water storage pond. A better result would achieved if the measures are supplemented with the repair and management of endogenous water bodies.
耿乃立.北方干旱区恢复完善农村涝池一举多得[J].中国水利,2017(14):40-42.
刘韵琴.再生水补给的城市景观水体富营养化和生态防治[J].中南林业科技大学学报(社会科学版),2013,7(3):30-35.
权伟.农村涝池水生态修复建设研究[J].陕西水利,2018(4):66-69.
杨雲舒,刘文兆,宁婷婷,等.长武塬区涝池演变特征分析[J].水土保持通报,2015,35(5):315-318,322.
李文娟,黄力平,赵传燕,等.黑河上游天涝池流域典型灌木生态参数研究[J].干旱区地理,2018,41(5):1073-1079.
叶雅.西江2000-2009年水环境质量及水质变化趋势分析[J].净水技术,2010,29(4):65-70.
Pinto U, Maheshwari B, Shrestha S, et al. Modelling eutrophication and microbial risks in peri-urban river systems using discriminant function analysis[J]. Water Research, 2012,46(19):6476-6488.
Soares M, Vale M, Vasconcelos V. Effects of nitrate reduction on the eutrophication of an urban man-made lake (Palácio de Cristal, Porto, Portugal)[J]. Environmental Technology, 2011,32(9):1009-1015.
陕西省水土保持局,大荔县市场监督管理局,大荔县水务局. DB61/T 1133-2018陕西省地方标准美丽乡村涝池建设规范[S].陕西省质量技术监督局发布,2018.
中国环境监督总站,辽宁省环境监测中心站. HJ495-2009水质采样方案设计技术规定[S].中华人民共和国国家环境保护部发布,北京:中国环境出版社,2009.
中国环境科学研究院.GB3838-2002地表水环境质量标准[S].国家环境保护总局发布,北京:中国环境出版社,2002.
环境保护部环境工程评估中心,中国水利水电科学研究院.HJ2.3-2018环境影响评价技术导则地表水环境[S]. 中华人民共和国国家环境保护部发布,北京:中国环境出版社,2018.
张彩香,王焰新,张兆年.因子分析法在黄柏河下游水质评价中的应用[J].水资源保护,2005,21(4):11-14.
朱灵峰,王燕,王阳阳,等.基于单因子指数法的海浪河水质评价[J].江苏农业科学,2012,40(3):326-327.
庄源益,戴树桂,张明顺.水中氨氮挥发影响因素探讨[J].环境化学,1995,14(4):343-346.
李如忠,刘科峰,钱靖,等.合肥市区典型景观水体氮磷污染特征及富营养化评价[J].环境科学,2014,35(5):1718-1726.
李勇,王超,杨金虎.蓄集雨水污染成因分析及防治对策[J].干旱区资源与环境,2003,17(4):108-112.
王广周.窖水水质影响因素的初步研究[D].陕西杨凌:中国科学院研究生院(教育部水土保持与生态环境研究中心), 2008:22-23.
唐莲,白丹.农业活动非点源污染与水环境恶化[J].环境保护,2003,31(3):18-20.
刘桂平,周永春,方炎,等.我国农业污染的现状及应对建议[J].国际技术经济研究,2006(4):17-21.
郭红雨.城市滨水景观设计研究[J].华中建筑,1998,16(3):75-77.
魏明强,刘有录,张乐婷.生态建筑的新材料在水池中的应用[J].中国建材科技,2014,23(6):29-31.
0
浏览量
847
下载量
2
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010802024621