1. 浙江大学 土地与国家发展研究院,浙江,杭州,310029
2. 杭州浙大东南土地研究所有限公司,浙江,杭州,310029
3. 国土资源部 城乡建设用地节约集约利用实验室,北京,100812
纸质出版:2020
移动端阅览
赵景辉, 丁庆龙, 叶艳妹, 等. 基于公众视角的土地整治供需匹配研究——以杭州市萧山区为例[J]. 水土保持通报, 2020,40(1):221-228.
Zhao Jinghui, Ding Qinglong, Ye Yanmei, et al. Study on Supply and Demand Matching of Land Consolidation from Public Perspective—A Case Study of Xiaoshan District, Hangzhou City[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2020, 40(1): 221-228.
赵景辉, 丁庆龙, 叶艳妹, 等. 基于公众视角的土地整治供需匹配研究——以杭州市萧山区为例[J]. 水土保持通报, 2020,40(1):221-228. DOI: 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2020.01.032.
Zhao Jinghui, Ding Qinglong, Ye Yanmei, et al. Study on Supply and Demand Matching of Land Consolidation from Public Perspective—A Case Study of Xiaoshan District, Hangzhou City[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2020, 40(1): 221-228. DOI: 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2020.01.032.
[目的] 基于公众视角对土地整治供需情况进行测算,旨在为完善土地整治内涵提供科学依据。[方法] 从农业发展、生活与生态环境改善和休闲文化旅游3个方面,构建土地整治供需指标测算体系,揭示浙江省杭州市萧山区土地整治供需匹配度。[结果] ①萧山区保障农业发展类匹配度整体较高,均在0.88以上;生活与生态环境改善类次之,均在0.85以上;休闲文化旅游类较低,最低仅为0.83。②土地整治过于强调农业发展供给,而生活与生态环境、休闲文化旅游供给相对不足,公众需求表达机制缺失,参与度较低,导致对土地产品需求不能得到有效地满足。[结论] 基于公众视角和供需理论构建的土地整治供需匹配模型定量化测算供需匹配度具有一定科学性。
[Objective] A calculation of land consolidation supply and demand was conducted based on the public perspective
and in order to provide a scientific basis for improving the content of land consolidation.[Methods] From agricultural development
living and ecological environmental improvements
and leisure culture and tourism
the research constructed a supply and demand index system. This revealed the matching degree of land consolidation supply and demand in Xiaoshan District
Hangzhou City
Zhejiang Province.[Results] ① The matching degree of agricultural development in Xiaoshan District was high overall (>0.88); The matching degree of living and ecological environment improvement was all above 0.85
and the matching degree of leisure culture and tourism was lower
the lowest was only 0.83. ② Land consolidation overemphasized the supply of agricultural development
while the supply of living and ecological environment
leisure culture and tourism was relatively insufficient
and the lack of mechanism for public demand expression and public participation
resulted in the inability to meet the demand for land products.[Conclusion] The land consolidation supply and demand matching model based on the public perspective and supply and demand theory
can effectively measure the matching degree quantitatively.
王军,钟莉娜.中国土地整治文献分析与研究进展[J].中国土地科学,2016,30(4):88-97.
刘彦随,朱琳,李玉恒.转型期农村土地整治的基础理论与模式探析[J].地理科学进展,2012,31(6):777-782.
徐保根,杨雪锋,陈佳骊.浙江嘉兴市"两分两换"农村土地整治模式探讨[J].中国土地科学,2011,25(1):37-42.
杨俊,王占岐,金贵,等.基于AHP与模糊综合评价的土地整治项目实施后效益评价[J].长江流域资源与环境,2013,22(8):1036-1042.
Jin Xiaobin, Xu Xiaoxiao, Xiang Xiaomin, et al. System-dynamic analysis on socio-economic impacts of land consolidation in China[J]. Habitat International, 2016,56:166-175.
王云霞,南灵.基于SEM的土地整理项目"三农"效益评价:以陕西省揉谷镇347份农户调查为例[J].中国土地科学,2015,29(3):75-81.
张晓平. 基于功能导向的西藏土地整治研究[D]. 北京:中国农业大学, 2014.
张正峰,陈百明,董锦.土地整理潜力内涵与评价方法研究初探[J].资源科学,2002,24(4):43-48.
Miranda D, Crecente R, Alvarez M F. Land consolidation in inland rural Galicia, N. W. Spain,since 1950:An example of the formulation and use of questions,criteria and indicators for evaluation of rural development policies[J]. Land Use Policy, 2006,23(4):511-520.
胡学东,王占岐,童秋英,等.基于生态和社会经济约束的区域土地整治潜力评价研究[J].长江流域资源与环境,2016,25(5):804-812.
冯应斌,杨庆媛.转型期中国农村土地综合整治重点领域与基本方向[J].农业工程学报,2014,30(1):175-182.
丁向华,姜照勇,罗良伟,等.基于生态环境保护视角的土地整理生态效益评价:以成都市三河镇土地整理项目为例[J].资源科学,2011,33(11):2055-2062.
郧文聚,宇振荣.土地整治加强生态景观建设理论、方法和技术应用对策[J].中国土地科学,2011,25(6):4-9,19.
谷晓坤.湖北省不同类型土地整治生态效应评价[J].应用生态学报,2012,23(8):2263-2269.
王军.土地整治呼唤景观生态建设[J].中国土地科学,2011,25(6):15-19.
宇振荣,刘文平,郧文聚.土地整治:加强公众参与促转型[J].中国土地,2012(8):12-14.
石峡,朱道林,张军连.土地整治公众参与机制中的社会资本及其作用[J].中国土地科学,2014,28(4):84-90.
刘新卫,吴初国.建立健全土地整治公众参与机制[J].国土资源情报,2013(7):37-40.
吴次芳,费罗成,叶艳妹.土地整治发展的理论视野、理性范式和战略路径[J].经济地理,2011,31(10):1718-1722.
严金明,夏方舟,马梅.中国土地整治转型发展战略导向研究[J].中国土地科学,2016,30(2):3-10.
谭小芳.从马斯洛的需要层序理论反思主流经济学[J].广西社会科学,2005(6):47-49.
0
浏览量
874
下载量
0
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010802024621