1. 河南理工大学 测绘与国土信息工程学院,河南,焦作,454000
2. 中国科学院深圳先进技术研究院 空间信息研究中心,广东,深圳,518055
纸质出版:2019
移动端阅览
肖红克, 王莉, 李洪忠, 等. 基于生态系统格局变化的东西部结合区生态服务价值评价——以珠江—西江经济带为例[J]. 水土保持通报, 2019,39(6):252-259.
Xiao Hongke, Wang Li, Li Hongzhong, et al. Evaluation of Ecological Service Value of East-West Combined Area Based on Changes of Ecosystem Pattern—A Case Study in Pearl River-Xijiang River Economic Zone[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2019, 39(6): 252-259.
肖红克, 王莉, 李洪忠, 等. 基于生态系统格局变化的东西部结合区生态服务价值评价——以珠江—西江经济带为例[J]. 水土保持通报, 2019,39(6):252-259. DOI: 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2019.06.037.
Xiao Hongke, Wang Li, Li Hongzhong, et al. Evaluation of Ecological Service Value of East-West Combined Area Based on Changes of Ecosystem Pattern—A Case Study in Pearl River-Xijiang River Economic Zone[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2019, 39(6): 252-259. DOI: 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2019.06.037.
[目的] 以珠江—西江经济带为例,分析典型东西部结合区生态系统格局变化特征以及对其生态系统服务价值进行评价,为积极构建区域生态安全格局和开展生态补偿研究提供科学依据。[方法] 基于珠江—西江经济带2000—2015年生态系统类型数据,采用生态系统类型年均变化率、生态系统类型转移矩阵研究其生态系统格局变化特点;参考生态系统服务价值估算方法,对研究区近15 a来的生态服务价值进行评价与分析。[结果] ①2000—2015年珠江—西江经济带以森林和农田生态系统为主,生态系统空间分布格局较稳定,变化的部分主要体现在东部人工表面生态系统的扩张上。②近15 a间农田和草地生态系统面积下降最多,湿地下降较少,其余生态系统类型面积均有不同程度地增加。生态系统类型转换主要发生在森林、农田和人工表面生态系统三者之间。③2000—2015年珠江—西江经济带生态服务价值减少了14.55亿元,其中草地生态系统服务价值下降最多,森林生态系统服务价值增加最多。④珠江—西江经济带各县区生态服务价值空间分布格局稳定,但东部地区单位面积生态服务价值有持续下降的趋势。[结论] 2000—2015年珠江—西江经济带东部生态系统格局变化对其生态服务价值下降产生了较大影响。今后在生态建设方面需重点合理控制东部人工表面生态系统面积的扩张速度,预防其生态服务价值持续下降。
[Objective] Taking the Pearl River-Xijiang River economic zone as an example
this paper analyzed the change of ecosystem pattern and evaluated its ecosystem service value in the typical east-west junction area
in order to provide a scientific basis for the construction of the regional ecological security pattern and ecological compensation research.[Methods] Based on the data of ecosystem types in the Pearl River-Xijiang River economic zone from 2000 to 2015
the change characteristics of ecosystem pattern were studied by using the annual average change rate and the transfer matrix of ecosystem types. The ecosystem service value in the research area was evaluated and analyzed in the past 15 years.[Results] ① During 2000-2015
the Pearl River-Xijiang River economic zone was dominated by forest and farmland ecosystems
and the spatial distribution pattern of ecosystems was relatively stable. The changes were mainly the expansion of the eastern artificial surface ecosystem. ② The area of farmland and grassland ecosystems decreased the most
while the wetland decreased least
and the area of the other ecosystem types increased in varying degrees. The conversion of ecosystem types mainly occurred between forest
farmland and artificial surface ecosystems. ③ From 2000 to 2015
the ecosystem service value in the Pearl River-Xijiang River Economic Zone decreased by 1.455 billion RMB
of which the value of grassland ecosystem service declined the most
while the value of forest ecosystem service increased the most. ④ The spatial distribution pattern of ecosystem service value in the counties and the districts of the Pearl River-Xijiang River economic zone was stable
but the ecosystem service value of per unit area in the eastern region showed a continuous decline trend.[Conclusion] The changes in the ecosystem pattern in the eastern part of the Pearl River-Xijiang River economic zone from 2000 to 2015 had a great impact on the decline of its ecosystem service value. In the future
it is necessary to control the expansion rate of the area of the artificial surface ecosystem in the east
to prevent the continuous decline of ecological service value.
甘琳,陈颖彪,吴志峰,等.近20年粤港澳大湾区生态敏感性变化[J].生态学杂志,2018,37(8):2453-2462.
幸赞品,颜长珍,冯坤,等.1975-2015年宁夏生态系统格局宏观变化分析[J].生态学报,2018,38(22):7912-7920.
孟楠,韩宝龙,王海洋,等.澳门城市生态系统格局变化研究[J].生态学报,2018,38(18):6442-6451.
林金煌,陈文惠,祁新华,等.闽三角城市群生态系统格局演变及其驱动机制[J].生态学杂志,2018,37(1):203-210.
孔令桥,张路,郑华,等.长江流域生态系统格局演变及驱动力[J].生态学报,2018,38(3):741-749.
李霞,杜世勋,桑满杰,等.山西省自然保护区生态系统格局及稳定性变化趋势研究[J].自然资源学报,2018,33(2):208-218.
黄麟,曹巍,巩国丽,等.2000-2010年中国三北地区生态系统时空变化特征[J].生态学报,2016,36(1):107-117.
吴丹,邹长新,林乃峰,等.长江经济带生态系统宏观结构变化特征分析[J].生态与农村环境学报,2018,34(6):499-503.
陈万旭,李江风,朱丽君.长江中游地区生态系统服务价值空间分异及敏感性分析[J].自然资源学报,2019,34(2):325-337.
Costanza R, D'Arge R, De Groot R, et al. The value of the world's ecosystem services and natural capital[J]. Nature,1997,387(6630):253-260.
Daily G C. Nature's Services:Societal Dependence on Natural Ecosystems[M]. Washington D C:Island Press, 1997.
王军,顿耀龙.土地利用变化对生态系统服务的影响研究综述[J].长江流域资源与环境,2015,24(05):798-808.
谢高地,甄霖,鲁春霞,等.一个基于专家知识的生态系统服务价值化方法[J].自然资源学报,2008,23(5):911-919.
谢高地,张彩霞,张雷明,等.基于单位面积价值当量因子的生态系统服务价值化方法改进[J].自然资源学报,2015,30(8):1243-1254.
徐煖银,孙思琦,薛达元,等.基于地形梯度的赣南地区生态系统服务价值对人为干扰的空间响应[J].生态学报,2019,39(1):97-107.
万勤,孟优,谢新辉,等.新疆生产建设兵团生态系统服务价值时空分异特征[J].生态学报,2014,34(23):7057-7066.
李哲,张飞, Hsiang-teKung,等.1998-2014年艾比湖湿地自然保护区生态系统服务价值及其时空变异[J].生态学报,2017,37(15):4984-4997.
盛晓雯,曹银贵,周伟,等.京津冀地区土地利用变化对生态系统服务价值的影响[J].中国农业资源与区划,2018,39(6):79-86.
罗盛锋,闫文德.广西北部湾沿岸地区生态系统服务价值变化及其驱动力[J].生态学报,2018,38(9):3248-3259.
农殷璇,臧俊梅,许进龙.珠江-西江经济带土地综合承载力测算及其系统耦合协调度研究[J].水土保持研究,2018,25(4):264-269.
刘民坤,陈湘漪.珠江-西江经济带生态补偿机制建设研究[J].广西大学学报:哲学社会科学版,2015,37(2):62-67.
国家发改委.珠江-西江经济带发展规划[EB/OL]//(2014-07-28)[2019-06-17]. http://www.ndrc.gov.cn/zcfb/zcfbtz/201408/t20140801_620974.Html.
0
浏览量
972
下载量
0
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010802024621