汾河下游丰水和枯水期的河流硝酸盐污染来源特征

杨锐婧; 冯民权; 汪银龙

doi:10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2019.06.031

您当前的位置：

首页 >

文章列表页 >

汾河下游丰水和枯水期的河流硝酸盐污染来源特征

试验研究

- 汾河下游丰水和枯水期的河流硝酸盐污染来源特征
- Source Characteristics of Nitrate Pollution in Fenhe River During High and Low Water Periods
- 水土保持通报 2019年39卷第6期页码：211-217
- 作者机构：
  
  西安理工大学省部共建西北旱区生态水利国家重点实验室,陕西,西安,710048
- 作者简介：
- 基金信息：
  
  国家自然科学基金项目“河流交汇区水流紊动特性与污染物输运机理研究”（51679191）;山西省水利科学技术研究与推广项目“汾河下游氮污染源解析”（2017SZ02）;山西省水利厅项目“氮磷营养盐对漳泽水库浮游植物生长的影响”（201826）
- DOI：10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2019.06.031
  中图分类号：
- 纸质出版：2019
- 稿件说明：
移动端阅览
杨锐婧, 冯民权, 汪银龙. 汾河下游丰水和枯水期的河流硝酸盐污染来源特征[J]. 水土保持通报, 2019,39(6):211-217.

Yang Ruijing, Feng Minquan, Wang Yinlong. Source Characteristics of Nitrate Pollution in Fenhe River During High and Low Water Periods[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2019, 39(6): 211-217.
杨锐婧, 冯民权, 汪银龙. 汾河下游丰水和枯水期的河流硝酸盐污染来源特征[J]. 水土保持通报, 2019,39(6):211-217. DOI： 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2019.06.031.

Yang Ruijing, Feng Minquan, Wang Yinlong. Source Characteristics of Nitrate Pollution in Fenhe River During High and Low Water Periods[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2019, 39(6): 211-217. DOI： 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2019.06.031.

摘要

[目的

]

对汾河径流丰水期和枯水期的河流硝酸盐污染来源特征进行对比分析和研究，为汾河下游氮源污染治理提供理论支持。[方法

]

通过研究2018年汾河下游水体硝酸盐及其氮、氧同位素不同时期的变化，分析排入河流的硝酸盐来源雨期性变化特征，并引入IsoSoure模型，定量计算各污染源对汾河下游水体硝酸盐的贡献。[结果

]

在丰水期和枯水期，δ

N值变化范围为3.45‰～11.19‰，δ

O值变化范围为-0.72‰～3.17‰，硝酸盐污染源主要为农业化肥、土壤有机氮、生活污水与粪便；硝酸盐污染源主要与汾河下游周围土地利用类型相关，丰水期临汾段与M

采样点硝酸盐污染源主要为粪便和污水，分别占比为58%，40%，72%和58%，M

—M

段农业化肥贡献率最高，占比分别45.4%，62%，56.6%，56.5%。枯水期所有采样点硝酸盐污染源贡献率最高的都为粪便和污水，占比为40%～73%。[结论

]

汾河径流硝酸盐污染来源主要为农业化肥、土壤有机氮、生活污水与粪便，并且污染来源与土地利用类型有很强相关性，不同水期硝酸盐污染来源大多为粪便和生活污水，差别主要体现在M

—M

取样点，丰水期主要污染物为农业化肥，而枯水期为粪便与生活污水。

Abstract

[Objective] The source characteristics of nitrate pollution in the high and low water period of Fenhe River were analyzed and studied in order to provide theoretical support for the treatment of nitrogen pollution in the lower reaches of the Fenhe River.[Methods] The changes of nitrate and its nitrogen and oxygen isotopes in different periods in the lower reaches of Fenhe River in 2018 was analyzed to investigate the characteristics of the change of nitrate sources discharged into the river in rainy periods. And the Isosoure model was introduced to calculate the contribution of each pollution source to the nitrate in the lower reaches of Fenhe River.[Results] In the high and low water period

the variation range of δ15N was 3.45‰~11.19‰

δ18O value was -0.72‰~3.17‰. The nitrate pollution sources were mainly agricultural fertilizer

soil organic nitrogen

domestic sewage and feces. The nitrate pollution sources were mainly related to the land use types around the lower reaches of Fenhe River. In the high water period

the nitrate pollution sources at Linfen section and M5 sampling point were mainly feces and sewage

accounting for 58%

40%

72% and 58%

respectively. The contribution rate of agricultural fertilizer in M6-M9 section was the highest

accounting for 45.4%

62%

56.6% and 56.5%

respectively. The highest contribution rate of nitrate pollution sources in all sampling points in low water period was feces and sewage

accounting for 40%~73%.[Conclusion] The main sources of nitrate pollution in the runoff of Fenhe River are agricultural fertilizer

soil organic nitrogen

domestic sewage and feces

and the pollution sources are closely related to land use types. Most of the sources of nitrate pollution in different water periods are feces and domestic sewage

and the difference is mainly reflected in the M6-M9 sampling point. The main pollutants in the wet period are agricultural fertilizer

while in the dry period are feces and domestic sewage.

关键词

Keywords

references

韩智勇,许模,刘国,等.生活垃圾填埋场地下水污染物识别与质量评价[J].中国环境科学,2015,35(9):2843-2852.

Mathieu S, Gilles B, Bernhard M, et al. Assessing nitrification and denitrification in the Seine River and Estuary using chemical and isotopic techniques[J]. Ecosystems, 2006,9(4):564-577.

Liu J, Jiang L H, Zhang C J, et al. Nitrate-nitrogen contamination in groundwater:Spatiotemporal variation and driving factors under cropland in Shandong Province, China[J]. IOP Conference Series Earth and Environmental Science, 2017,82(1):012059.

马广文,王圣瑞,王业耀,等.鄱阳湖流域面源污染负荷模拟与氮和磷时空分布特征[J].环境科学学报,2015,35(5):1285-1291.

肖满成.巢湖水体中氮磷营养盐时空分布特征研究[D].安徽芜湖:安徽师范大学,2015.

蔡莹,杨旭,万鲁河,等.北方寒冷地区冻融期河岸缓冲区土地利用结构对河流水质的影响[J].环境科学学报,2019,39(3):679-687.

项颂,庞燕,窦嘉顺,等.不同时空尺度下土地利用对洱海入湖河流水质的影响[J].生态学报,2018,38(3):876-885.

Liu Congqiang, Li Siliang, Lang Yunchao, et al. Using delta

N-and delta

O values to identify nitrate sources in karst ground water, Guiyang, Southwest China[J]. Environmental Science&Technology, 2006,40(22):6928-6933.

鲁垠涛,刘芳,姚宏,等.北京密云水库小流域地下水硝酸盐污染来源示踪[J].环境化学,2016,35(1):180-188.

Costanzo S D, O'Donohue M J, Dennison W C, et al. A new approach for detecting and mapping sewage impacts[J]. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 2001,42(2):149-156.

Vander Zanden M J, Vadeboncoeur Y, Diebel M W, et al. Primary consumer stable nitrogen isotopes as indicators of nutrient source[J]. Environmental Science & Technology, 2005,39(19):7509-7515.

Seiler R L. Combined use of

N and

O of nitrate and

B to evaluate nitrate contamination in groundwater[J]. Applied Geochemistry, 2005,20(9):1626-1636.

Widory D, Kloppmann W, Chery L, et al. Nitrate in groundwater, an isotope multi-tracer approach[J]. Journal of Contaminant Hydrology, 2004,72(1/4):165-188.

邢萌,刘卫国.浐河、灞河硝酸盐端元贡献比例:基于硝酸盐氮、氧同位素研究[J].地球环境学报,2016,7(1):27-36.

孟志龙,杨永刚,秦作栋.汾河下游流域水体硝酸盐污染过程同位素示踪[J].中国环境科学,2017,37(3):1066-1072.

张妍,张秋英,李发东,等.基于稳定同位素和贝叶斯模型的引黄灌区地下水硝酸盐污染源解析[J].中国生态农业学报,2019,27(3):484-493.

彭聪,潘晓东,焦友军,等.多种同位素手段的硝酸盐污染源解析:以会仙湿地为例[J].环境科学,2018,39(12):124-131.

邢肖鹏,薛鹏松,冯民权.运城段河流水质评价[J].水土保持通报,2011,31(2):142-145.

吴文欢,何小娟,吴海露,等.运用氮、氧双同位素技术研究永安江硝酸盐来源[J].生态与农村环境学报,2016,32(5):802-807.

Iii J B H, Ferguson J M. Estimating the diets of animals using stable isotopes and a comprehensive bayesian mixing model[J]. Plos One, 2012,7(1):e28478.

Voss M, Deutsch B, Elmgren R, et al. Source identification of nitrate by means of isotopic tracers in the Baltic Sea catchments[J]. Biogeosciences, 2006,3(4):663-676.

王鹏,齐述华,袁瑞强.赣江流域土地利用方式对无机氮的影响[J].环境科学学报,2015,35(3):826-835.

Chen Fajin, Li Xuehui, Jia Guodong. The application of nitrogen and oxygen isotopes in the study of nitrate in rivers[J]. Advances in Earth Science, 2007,22(12):1251-1257.

孙明辉.水体硝态氮稳定同位素分析方法研究[D].山东青岛:中国海洋大学,2008.

吴文欢,何小娟,苏跃龙,等.基于氮氧稳定同位素识别水体氮源的研究进展[J].环境科学与技术,2016,39(08):77-84.

徐志伟,张心昱,于贵瑞,等.中国水体硝酸盐氮氧双稳定同位素溯源研究进展[J].环境科学,2014,35(8):3230-3238.

康萍萍,许士国,禹守泉.同位素溯源解析地下水库对地下水氮分布影响[J].水资源保护,2016,32(5):79-84.

邢萌,刘卫国,胡婧.浐河、涝河河水硝酸盐氮污染来源的氮同位素示踪[J].环境科学,2010,31(10):2305-2310.

浏览量

723

下载量

CSCD

文章被引用时，请邮件提醒。

提交

工具集

关联资源

区域泥石流危险度评价的影响因子识别

基于贡献率模型的崩塌易发性评价——以广州市白云区为例

不同土地利用方式下农地土壤侵蚀与养分流失

半干旱区露天矿排土场不同植物水分利用策略的季节变化

不同雨强和坡度下新安江流域典型土壤坡面的产流产沙特征