贵州师范大学 地理与环境科学学院,贵州,贵阳,550001
纸质出版:2019
移动端阅览
李芹, 容丽, 王敏. 地形对喀斯特山地植物物种多样性及分布格局的影响[J]. 水土保持通报, 2019,39(6):27-34.
Li Qin, Rong Li, Wang Min. Effects of Topography on Diversity and Distribution Pattern of Plant Species in Karst Mountains Area[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2019, 39(6): 27-34.
李芹, 容丽, 王敏. 地形对喀斯特山地植物物种多样性及分布格局的影响[J]. 水土保持通报, 2019,39(6):27-34. DOI: 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2019.06.005.
Li Qin, Rong Li, Wang Min. Effects of Topography on Diversity and Distribution Pattern of Plant Species in Karst Mountains Area[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2019, 39(6): 27-34. DOI: 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2019.06.005.
[目的] 研究地形对喀斯特地区植物物种多样性与分布格局的影响,为喀斯特区生态保护与维持提供科学依据。[方法] 利用方差分析、典范对应分析(CCA)研究贵州省施秉县喀斯特山地不同地形下乔木、灌木和草本植物物种多样性差异及地形因子对其分布格局的影响。[结果] 乔木在山顶的均匀度显著低于其他坡位;优势度显著高于其他坡位。灌木在山顶的多样性显著高于下坡和河谷;丰富度为山顶显著高于中、下坡和河谷,上坡显著高于下坡和河谷;河谷的优势度显著高于山顶。草本的多样性为山顶显著低于中、下坡和河谷;丰富度为山脊和山顶显著低于中、下坡和河谷;优势度与多样性表现相反。半阴坡的草本丰富度显著大于半阳坡。坡度对乔木丰富度与多样性的影响一致,均为平坡显著大于缓坡和斜坡,陡坡显著大于斜坡;均匀度为斜坡显著低于平坡和陡坡,优势度与均匀度表现相反。CCA排序表明,海拔和坡度对3种生长型植物分布格局的影响均显著,坡位对乔木分布格局的影响显著,坡向对3种生长型植物分布格局的影响均不显著。[结论] 喀斯特区植物物种多样性及其分布格局受以海拔、坡度为主,坡位和坡向为辅的多个因子共同的影响。
[Objective] The influence of topography on the diversity and distribution pattern of plant species in karst areas was studied
in order to provide scientific basis for ecological protection and maintenance in this region.[Methods] Variance analysis was used to study the species diversity of trees
shrubs and herbs under different topographic in Shibing karst area of Guizhou Province
and canonical correspondence analysis(CCA) was used to study the effects of topographic factors on their distribution patterns.[Results] The evenness of trees at the top of mountain was significantly lower than other slopes
while the dominance was significantly higher than other slopes. The diversity of shrubs at the top of mountain was significantly higher than that at the downhill and valley. The richness at the top of mountain was significantly higher than that at the middle slope
downhill slope and valley
and the uphill was significantly higher than that of the downhill and valley. The dominance of valley was significantly higher than that of the top of mountain. The diversity of herbs was significantly lower at the top of mountain than that at the middle slope
downhill and valley. The richness was significantly lower at the ridge and the top of mountain than that at the middle slope
downhill and valley. The dominance was opposite to the diversity. The richness of herbs in semi-shady slope was significantly higher than that in semi-sunny slope. The influence of slope on the richness and diversity of trees was consistent
the flat slope was significantly higher than those on the gentle slope and slope
and steep slope was significantly higher than those on slope. The evenness of slope was significantly lower than those on flat slope and steep slope
while the dominance was opposite to the evenness. The CCA results showed that
elevation and slope had significant influence on the distribution pattern of the three types of growing plants while slope direction had no significant influence. Slope position had significant influence only on the distribution pattern of tree species.[Conclusion] The diversity and distribution pattern of plant species in karst areas are influenced by many factors
elevation and slope are the main influential factors
and slope position and slope direction are the secondary influential factors.
尚文艳,吴钢,付晓,等.陆地植物群落物种多样性维持机制[J].应用生态学报,2005,16(3):573-578.
蔡庆空,蒋金豹,崔希民,等.环境因子对土壤水分空间异质性的影响:以北京市怀柔区为例[J].山地学报,2013,31(3):294-299.
龙翠玲.不同地形部位喀斯特森林物种多样性的比较研究:以贵州茂兰自然保护区为例[J].中国岩溶,2007,26(1):55-60.
黄甫昭,丁涛,李先琨,等.弄岗喀斯特季节性雨林不同群丛物种多样性随海拔的变化[J].生态学报,2016,36(14):4509-4517.
Cadotte M W, Carscadden K, Mirotchnick N. Beyond species:Functional diversity and the maintenance of ecological processes and services[J]. Journal of Applied Ecology, 2011,48(5):1079-1087.
James H. Brown. Mammals on mountainsides:Elevational patterns of diversity[J]. Global Ecology and Biogeography, 2001,10(1):101-109.
王志恒,陈安平,方精云.湖南省种子植物物种丰富度与地形的关系[J].地理学报,2004,59(6):889-894.
贺金生,陈伟烈.陆地植物群落物种多样性的梯度变化特征[J].生态学报,1997,17(1):93-101.
高策,王鸿彬,张合平,等.广西喀斯特地区不同立地条件群落物种多样性[J].广西林业科学,2014,43(1):41-45.
区余端,苏志尧,李镇魁,等.地形因子对粤北山地森林不同生长型地表植物分布格局的影响[J].应用生态学报,2011,22(5):1107-1113.
文丽,宋同清,杜虎,等.中国西南喀斯特植物群落演替特征及驱动机制[J].生态学报,2015,35(17):5822-5833.
吴华丽,代小燕.喀斯特地区石漠化生境特征与植被恢复的植物选择探讨[J].水土保持应用技术,2014(4):39-42.
赵敏慧,陆艳,王婷,等.云南省砚山县石漠化区域植被修复的物种配置研究[J].水土保持通报,2015,35(2):319-325+331.
张承琴,王普昶,龙翠玲,等.贵州喀斯特峰丛洼地不同石漠化等级植物群落物种组成和多样性特征[J].西南大学学报:自然科学版,2015,37(6):48-53.
俞月凤,何铁光,杜虎,等.桂西北喀斯特地区不同退化程度植被群落物种组成及多样性特征[J].广西植物,2019,39(2):178-188.
李晓娜,熊康宁,陈浒,等.黔东南施秉白云岩喀斯特地区生物多样性与世界遗产价值[J].贵州师范大学学报:自然科学版,2010,28(3):13-18.
汤晓辛,张潮,商传禹.世界遗产地施秉云台山白云岩喀斯特野生种子植物的区系[J].分子植物育种,2017,15(5):1986-1993.
李世奇,熊康宁,苏孝良,等.世界自然遗产提名地施秉喀斯特地貌及其演化[J].贵州师范大学学报:自然科学版,2012,30(3):12-17.
马克平.生物群落多样性的测度方法:α多样性的测度方法(上)[J].生物多样性,1994,2(3):162-168.
马克平,刘玉明.生物群落多样性的测度方法:α多样性的测度方法(下)[J].生物多样性,1994,2(4):231-239.
张金屯.数量生态学[M].北京:科学出版社,2011.
田迅,高凯,张丽娟,等.坡位对土壤水分及植被空间分布的影响[J].水土保持通报,2015,35(5):12-16.
彭晚霞,宋同清,曾馥平,等.喀斯特常绿落叶阔叶混交林植物与土壤地形因子的耦合关系[J].生态学报,2010,30(13):3472-3481.
沈泽昊,张新时,金义兴.三峡大老岭森林物种多样性的空间格局分析及其地形解释[J].植物学报,2000,42(6):620-627.
Zhang Jintun, Zhang Feng. Ecological relations between forest communities and environmental variables in the Lishan Mountain Nature Reserve, China[J]. African Journal of Agricultural Research, 2011,6(2):248-259.
Tavili A, Jafari M. Interrelations between plants and environmental variables[J]. International Journal of Environmental Research, 2009,3(2):239-246.
黄甫昭,王斌,丁涛,等.弄岗北热带喀斯特季节性雨林群丛数量分类及与环境的关系[J].生物多样性,2014,22(2):157-166.
王世雄,王孝安,李国庆,等.陕西子午岭植物群落演替过程中物种多样性变化与环境解释[J].生态学报,2010,30(6):1638-1647.
袁铁象,张合平,欧芷阳,等.地形对桂西南喀斯特山地森林地表植物多样性及分布格局的影响[J].应用生态学报,2014,25(10):2803-2810.
欧芷阳,苏志尧,袁铁象,等.土壤肥力及地形因子对桂西南喀斯特山地木本植物群落的影响[J].生态学报,2014,34(13):3672-3681.
熊斌梅,雷耘,汪正祥,等.地形对七姊妹山自然保护区植物丰富度及分布格局的影响[J].西北植物学报,2016.36(11):2307-2313.
0
浏览量
1202
下载量
15
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010802024621