1. 成都理工大学 地球科学学院,四川,成都,610059
2. 中国科学院 水利部 成都山地灾害与环境研究所 山地表生过程与生态调控重点实验室,四川,成都,610041
3. 成都理工大学 生态资源与景观研究所,四川,成都,610059
4. 四川省气象台,四川,成都,610072
纸质出版:2019
移动端阅览
杨兴, 张家喜, 彭培好, 等. 模拟降雨条件下不同砾石含量工程边坡土壤侵蚀及水动力学特征[J]. 水土保持通报, 2019,39(6):9-15.
Yang Xing, Zhang Jiaxi, Peng Peihao, et al. Effects of Gravel Content on Soil Erosion and Water Flow Mechanics of Engineering Slope Under Simulated Rainfall Conditions[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2019, 39(6): 9-15.
杨兴, 张家喜, 彭培好, 等. 模拟降雨条件下不同砾石含量工程边坡土壤侵蚀及水动力学特征[J]. 水土保持通报, 2019,39(6):9-15. DOI: 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2019.06.002.
Yang Xing, Zhang Jiaxi, Peng Peihao, et al. Effects of Gravel Content on Soil Erosion and Water Flow Mechanics of Engineering Slope Under Simulated Rainfall Conditions[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2019, 39(6): 9-15. DOI: 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2019.06.002.
[目的] 探究砾石含量对急陡工程边坡土壤侵蚀及流水力学特征的影响。[方法] 采用室内模拟降雨试验和人工制备土壤等方法,研究了在3种降雨强度(40,60,80 mm/h),5种砾石含量(3%,15%,35%,55%,75%)条件下50°工程边坡土壤侵蚀率变化特征以及土壤侵蚀率与各水动力学参数的关系。[结果] ①40,60,80 mm/h雨强下,各砾石含量坡面径流率较土质坡面分别减少了10.1%~55.9%,13.9%~41.9%,19.6%~47.7%;径流剪切力、径流功率、过水断面单位能分别与砾石含量呈显著递减的线性函数、指数函数、幂函数关系。②坡面侵蚀率随着砾石含量的增加而减小,不同试验雨强下侵蚀率大小及变化过程具有明显差异。当雨强为40 mm/h时,坡面整体产沙率较低,随降雨过程整体呈现出缓慢增加的趋势;当雨强为60 mm/h时,不同砾石含量下侵蚀率迅速增加后呈波浪式缓慢上升或平稳下降的趋势;当雨强为80 mm/h时,砾石含量为3%条件下,坡面侵蚀率迅速增长后增速降低,当砾石含量大于15%时,边坡侵蚀率达到峰值后均开始缓慢下降。③工程边坡土壤侵蚀率与径流率、径流剪切力、径流功率、过水断面单位能均呈显著线性函数、对数函数、幂函数关系。[结论] 工程边坡土壤中的砾石具有抗侵蚀作用,随着砾石含量的增多,坡面土壤侵蚀量和各水动力学参数均明显降低。
[Objective] We aim to investigate the effects of gravel content on soil erosion and water hydrodynamic characteristics of steep slope project.[Methods] The relationship between soil erosion change rate and soil erosion rate and hydrodynamic parameters was studied by means of indoor simulated rainfall experiment and artificial soil preparation
at 50° engineering slope with 5 kinds of gravel content(3%
15%
35%
55%
75%) under 3 rainfall intensity(40
60
80 mm/h).[Results] ① With 40
60
80 mm/h rain intensity
the slope runoff rate of each gravel content was decreased by 10.1%~55.9%
13.9%~41.9%
19.6%~47.7% compared with that of soil slope. Runoff shear force
runoff power and unit energy of runoff section showed a linear
exponential and power function relationship with gravel content
respectively. ② The erosion rate of slope decreased with the increase of gravel content
and the amount of erosion rate and the change process of different experimental rain intensity showed obvious difference. When the rain intensity was 40 mm/h
the overall sediment yield of the slope was low
and the rainfall duration showed a slow increase trend. When the rain intensity was 60 mm/h
the erosion rate increased rapidly under different gravel content
and then fluctuated. When the rain intensity was 80 mm/h
the gravel content was 3%
the growth rate of slope decreased rapidly after rapid growth. And when the gravel content was greater than 15%
the slope erosion rate began to decline slowly after reaching the peak value. ③ The soil erosion rate showed a significantly linear function
logarithmic function and power function relation with runoff rate
runoff shear force
runoff power and the unit energy of the water section of the project slope.[Conclusion] The soil gravel of engineering slope has anti-erosion effect
and with the increase of gravel content
the soil erosion amount and the hydrodynamic parameters of slope are reduced significantly.
王保一,张荣华,荆莎莎,等.降雨和坡度对路基边坡产流产沙的影响[J].南京林业大学学报,2018,43(2):114-120.
汤小橹,金晓斌,沈春竹,等.高速铁路施工建设土地破坏特征与防控措施[J].中国土地科学,2010,24(1):56-60.
乌玲瑛,严力蛟.基于GIS和RUSLE模型道路对土壤侵蚀格局的影响研究:以浙江省杭金衢高速诸暨段为例[J].生态学报,2014,34(19):5659-5669.
Li Tianyang, He Binghui, Chen Zhanpeng, et al. Effects of gravel on infiltration, runoff, and sediment yield in landslide deposit slope in Wenchuan earthquake area, China[J]. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2016,23(12):12075-12084.
Jomaa S, Barry D A, Heng B C P, et al. Influence of rock fragment coverage on soil erosion and hydrological response:Laboratory flume experiments and modeling[J]. Water Resources Research, 2012,48(5):1-21.
Li Tianyang, He Binghui, Chen Zhanpeng, et al. Effects of gravel on concentrated flow hydraulics and erosion in simulated landslide deposits[J]. Catena, 2017,156(9):197-204.
Lin Jinshi, Huang Yanhe, Zhao Gan, et al. Flow-driven soil erosion processes and the size selectivity of eroded sediment on steep slopes using colluvial deposits in a permanent gully[J]. Catena, 2017,157(10):47-57.
王蕙,胡秀君,山成菊,等.雨强和坡度对嵌套砾石红壤坡面产流产沙的影响[J].水土保持学报,2018,32(4):24-29.
徐锡蒙,郑粉莉,武敏,等.雨强和坡度对黄土陡坡地浅沟形态特征影响的定量研究[J].农业工程学报,2017,33(11):124-132.
Jomaa S, Barry D A, Brovelli A, et al. Rain splash soil erosion estimation in the presence of rock fragments[J]. Catena, 2012,92(5):38-48.
Papanicolaou A N, Dermisis D C, Elhakeem M. Investigating the role of clasts on the movement of sand in gravel bed rivers[J]. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 2011, 137(9):871-883.
陈心逸,李丽,佘冬立.砾石覆盖条件下盐碱土边坡降雨侵蚀水动力学特征[J].水土保持学报,2018,32(1):116-120.
Wu Lei, Peng Mengling, Qiao Shanshan, et al. Effects of rainfall intensity and slope gradient on runoff and sediment yield characteristics of bare loess soil[J]. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2018,25(4):3480-3487.
陈晓安,杨洁,汤崇军,等.雨强和坡度对红壤坡耕地地表径流及壤中流的影响[J].农业工程学报,2017,33(9):141-146.
王晨沣,王彬,王玉杰,等.不同土壤前期含水率和坡度下黄壤分离临界水动力特征[J].农业机械学报,2017,48(4):224-232.
孙丽丽,査轩,黄少燕,等.不同降雨强度对紫色土坡面侵蚀过程的影响[J].水土保持学报,2018,32(5):18-23.
康宏亮,王文龙,薛智德,等.北方风沙区砾石对堆积体坡面径流及侵蚀特征的影响[J].农业工程学报,2016,32(3):125-134.
赵满,王文龙,郭明明,等.含砾石风沙土堆积体坡面径流产沙特征[J].土壤学报,2019,56(4):1-15.
沈海鸥,刘健,王宇,等.降雨强度和坡度对黑土区土质道路路面侵蚀特征的影响[J].水土保持学报,2017,31(6):123-126.
王昌全,刘世全.二郎山森林土壤类型研究[J].四川农业大学学报,1990,8(4):298-311.
吕佼容,张文博,胡锦昇,等.连续降雨下不同砾石含量工程堆积体土壤侵蚀[J].水科学进展,2018,30(2):1-12.
吕刚,王婷,王韫策,等.辽西低山丘陵区坡地砾石含量及粒径对土壤入渗性能的影响[J].水土保持学报,2017,31(4):86-92.
张少博,李建贵,黄俊华,等.坡度对伊犁河流域土壤侵蚀的试验分析[J].甘肃农业大学学报.2018,53(1):110-114,123.
王小燕,李朝霞,蔡崇法.砾石覆盖紫色土坡耕地水文过程[J].水科学进展,2012,23(1):38-45.
王丽园,查轩,黄少燕,等.不同雨强条件下坡度对红壤坡面侵蚀的影响[J].水土保持学报,2017,31(5):40-44.
占顺.砾石覆盖对坡面流水动力学特性试验研究[D].湖北武汉:华中农业大学,2015.
白玉洁,张风宝,杨明义,等.急陡黄土坡面土壤剥蚀率变化的水动力学机制研究[J].水土保持学报,2018,32(4):1-6.
0
浏览量
934
下载量
7
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010802024621