1. 三峡大学 三峡库区 地质灾害教育部重点实验室,湖北,宜昌,443002
2. 三峡大学 三峡地区地质灾害与生态环境湖北省协同创新中心,湖北,宜昌,443002
3. 三峡大学 生物与制药学院,湖北,宜昌,443002
4. 华中农业大学 资源与环境学院,湖北,武汉,430070
纸质出版:2019
移动端阅览
马鹏飞, 许文年, 夏栋, 等. 基于龛深及其上覆土层稳定性的崩壁崩坍形成条件研究[J]. 水土保持通报, 2019,39(5):316-328.
Ma Pengfei, Xu Wennian, Xia Dong, et al. A Study on Formation Conditions of Collapse for Collapsed Walls in Consideration of Stability of Red Clay Weathering Soil Layers and Depth of Concave Cavities[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2019, 39(5): 316-328.
马鹏飞, 许文年, 夏栋, 等. 基于龛深及其上覆土层稳定性的崩壁崩坍形成条件研究[J]. 水土保持通报, 2019,39(5):316-328. DOI: 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2019.05.045.
Ma Pengfei, Xu Wennian, Xia Dong, et al. A Study on Formation Conditions of Collapse for Collapsed Walls in Consideration of Stability of Red Clay Weathering Soil Layers and Depth of Concave Cavities[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2019, 39(5): 316-328. DOI: 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2019.05.045.
[目的] 研究龛的形态与崩岗发育及崩岗侵蚀之间的关系,为崩岗治理规划、崩岗防治工程技术的改进提供一定的数据参考。[方法] 以湖北省通城县典型崩岗区崩壁土体为对象,构建崩壁连同龛二维数值模型,结合物理试验标定模拟所用的崩壁各土层基本特性参数。引入符合龛演化过程的"单元生死法",对引起天然状态下的崩壁明显崩塌(坍)所需的龛深最小(临界)值进行定量分析,并借助正交有限单元试验(ABAQUS)对诱发崩壁崩坍的因素进行主次评价,之后选取若干未降雨条件下不导致崩壁崩坍的龛深值,联合高阶插值与强度折减法导出了这些龛深与触发龛上覆红黏土体崩坍所需的极限饱和度之间的定量方程式。[结果] 龛深与崩壁的稳定性系数呈显著线性负相关;龛上覆土层的含水量是促使崩壁发生崩坍的最重要因子,坡度对崩壁稳定性影响较大,而龛相对高度及崩壁高度均对崩壁的稳定性影响极小。[结论] 崩壁崩坍的可能性在很大程度上受控于龛的凹陷深度和龛上覆红黏土体的含水状态,在崩岗侵蚀综合治理时需加以考虑。
[Objective] This study aimed to an investigation into the relationship between the dimensions of the concave cavity and the development of collapsed gullies and collapsed gully erosion in order to provide a scientific basis for the prevention of collapse and the engineering treatment of collapsed gullies.[Methods] The study focused on the collapse mound profile in Tongcheng County in Hubei Province. We calibrated the basic calculation parameters for each soil layer of the collapsed wall
through a series of indoor experiments and actual collapse conditions
introducing the "unit life and death method
" which modeled the evolution of the concave cavity
and applied analytical methods to the stability of the caved wall. Initially
2D finite (FE) numerical models of the collapsed wall-concave cavity were established
based on the ABAQUS software platform
which can be applied to quantitatively analyze the critical splash erosion pit depth value (D0) required for triggering the collapse of the wall under natural conditions. The sensitivity of the main factors that lead to the failure of the collapsed wall was evaluated by means of the orthogonal experimental design; furthermore
this article selected a series of depths of the concave cavity (less than D0). This study elucidated the quantitative relation between depths of concave cavity and the saturation threshold value that caused the collapse of the overlying red clay layer.[Results] The safety factor of the collapsed gully wall decreased linearly as the depth of the deep-cut hole increased. The water content of the red clay layer overlying the concave cavity was the most vital factor influencing collapse. In addition
the gradient of the collapsed wall had a significant impact on the stability of the collapsed wall. The relative depth of the concave cavity and the height of collapsed gully wall had little effect on the stability of the collapsed gully wall.[Conclusion] The possibility of collapse of gully walls depends largely on the size of the deep-cut hole and the moisture content of the soil above the concave cavity. Future research should apply this understanding to the prevention of collapse and to the engineering treatment of collapsed gullies.
丘世钧.红土坡地崩岗侵蚀过程与机理[J].水土保持通报,1994,14(6):31-40.
陈晓安,杨洁,肖胜生,等.崩岗侵蚀分布特征及其成因[J].山地学报,2013,31(6):716-722.
牛德奎.崩岗侵蚀调查方法的探讨[J].江西水利科技,1994,20(1):42-47.
林辉.不同尺度下环境因子对崩岗分布及其发育过程的影响[D]. 武汉:华中农业大学,2012.
刘若馨.黏土矿物含量对崩岗土体抗剪强度的影响[D].福州:福建农林大学,2017.
陈瑜.五华县油田镇崩岗侵蚀的时空分布变化与成因分析[D].南昌:江西农业大学,2017.
肖胜生,杨洁,方少文,等.南方红壤丘陵崩岗不同防治模式探讨[J].长江科学院院报,2014,31(1):18-22.
熊平生,袁航.花岗岩风化壳崩岗侵蚀剖面风化强度和粒度分布特征[J].水土保持研究,2018,25(2):157-161.
吴芳,李岚斌,李盟,等.南方崩岗崩壁快速稳定和绿化研究综述[J].亚热带水土保持,2019,31(1):49-51.
任兵芳,丁树文,吴大国,等.鄂东南崩岗崩壁溯源侵蚀特征研究[J].人民长江,2015,46(7):76-79.
刘希林,邱锦安,张大林.崩岗侵蚀区崩壁土体湿化机理及影响因素分析[J].水土保持学报,2016,30(4):80-84.
丁树文,蔡崇法,张光远.鄂东南花岗地区重力侵蚀及崩岗形成规律的研究[J].南昌水专学报,1995,14(S1):50-54.
邓羽松,丁树文,刘辰明,等.鄂东南花岗岩崩岗崩壁土壤水分特征研究[J].水土保持学报,2015,29(4):132-137.
葛宏力,黄炎和,蒋芳市.福建省崩岗发生的地质和地貌条件分析[J].水土保持通报,2007,27(2):128-131,140.
温美丽,陈瑜,何小武,等.基于GIS的崩岗分布及坡向选择性验证[J].中国水土保持科学,2018,16(3):1-7.
谢宝平,牛德奎.赣南红壤崩岗侵蚀区植物群落的研究[J].江西农业大学学报,2000,22(2):209-213.
李万能,金平伟,李岚斌,等.南方红壤丘陵区崩岗成因机理的研究进展[J].亚热带水土保持,2014,26(3):30-33,43.
韦海鹭.红壤丘陵区崩岗侵蚀的自然影响因素研究进展[J].亚热带水土保持,2018,30(1):15-16,19.
张良以,陈铁林,张顶立.降雨诱发膨胀土边坡渐进破坏研究[J].岩土工程学报,2019,41(1):70-77.
季翔,黄炎和,林金石,等.崩岗侵蚀沟的时空侵蚀特征及预测[J].山地学报,2019,37(1):86-97.
刘洪鹄,谢浩,钱峰.南方崩岗侵蚀机理及治理浅见[J].人民长江,2019,50(2):30-34.
季翔,黄炎和,林金石,等.基于CA-Markov模型与ANUDEM内插法的崩岗侵蚀量预估[J].农业工程学报,2018,34(21):128-136.
邓羽松,李双喜,丁树文,等.鄂东南崩岗不同层次土壤分形特征及抗蚀性研究[J].长江流域资源与环境,2016,25(1):63-70.
刘龙水.通城县花岗岩崩岗剖面优先流孔隙空间分布和水分特征研究[D].武汉:华中农业大学,2014.
冯春杰,邓羽松,何溢钧,等.基于主成分-聚类分析的崩岗侵蚀强度评价[J].水土保持研究,2019,26(1):41-46.
吴志峰,王继增.华南花岗岩风化壳岩土特性与崩岗侵蚀关系[J].水土保持学报,2000,14(2):31-35.
陈祯,任兵芳,丁树文,等.鄂东南花岗岩崩岗边坡稳定性研究[J].人民长江,2014,45(S2):109-111.
林敬兰.花岗岩崩岗红土层土体胀缩特性研究[J].水土保持学报,2019,33(2):87-92.
蒋琳琳,赵川.某料场逆层岩质边坡开挖过程数值分析[J].水电能源科学,2019,37(1):119-122.
陈梦兰.崩岗土壤渗透性能及改良实验研究[D].武汉:华中农业大学,2018.
叶龙珍,黄聿銮,柳侃,等.崩岗与滑坡泥石流对比研究[J].亚热带水土保持,2014,26(4):39-42.
黄圣伟.福建省花岗岩地区崩岗形成机理与数值模拟[D].福州:福州大学,2009.
张子白. L型挡土墙墙背水平冻胀力特性研究[D].北京:北京交通大学,2014.
闫超,刘松玉,籍晓蕾.一种基于强度折减法的次级滑动面分析方法研究[J].岩土力学,2016,37(4):935-942.
任露泉.试验优化设计与分析[M].北京:高等教育出版社,2003:12-19.
张勇,姚赫,李仁华,等.花岗岩残积土垂直层次抗剪强度变异性研究[J].人民长江,2016,47(23):91-96.
程子捷,张海东,蒋芳市,等.安溪县花岗岩崩岗土体水分特征曲线及其影响因素[J].水土保持学报,2018,32(3):120-125.
王彦华,谢先德,王春云.风化花岗岩崩岗灾害的成因机理[J].山地学报,2000,18(6):496-501.
0
浏览量
982
下载量
0
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010802024621