1. 内蒙古农业大学 沙漠治理学院,内蒙古,呼和浩特,010018
2. 鄂尔多斯市林业治沙科学研究院,内蒙古,鄂尔多斯,017000
3. 鄂尔多斯市林业工作站,内蒙古,鄂尔多斯,017000
纸质出版:2019
移动端阅览
童春元, 李钢铁, 卢立娜, 等. 杨树低效林下土壤粒径分布与分形特征[J]. 水土保持通报, 2019,39(5):308-315.
Tong Chunyuan, Li Gangtie, Lu Lina, et al. Distribution of Soil Size and Fractal Characteristics Under Low-Efficiency Poplar Forests[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2019, 39(5): 308-315.
童春元, 李钢铁, 卢立娜, 等. 杨树低效林下土壤粒径分布与分形特征[J]. 水土保持通报, 2019,39(5):308-315. DOI: 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2019.05.044.
Tong Chunyuan, Li Gangtie, Lu Lina, et al. Distribution of Soil Size and Fractal Characteristics Under Low-Efficiency Poplar Forests[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2019, 39(5): 308-315. DOI: 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2019.05.044.
[目的] 研究鄂尔多斯地区杨树低效林下土壤粒径分布与分形特征,为该地区杨树低效林的成因分析及改造提供基础依据,并为杨树人工林的科学管理提供参考与决策支持。[方法] 使用Mastersizer3000激光衍射粒度分析仪测量土壤粒径,采用土壤颗粒体积分形维数模型计算分形维数D值,并测定土壤养分。[结果] ①鄂尔多斯地区杨树低效林下土壤颗粒组成主要以细砂粒(42.33%)、极细砂粒(15.72%)、中砂粒(19.77%)为主;主要土壤质地类型为砂土;土壤颗粒的分形维数D值在1.222 5~2.204 5范围内,处于较低水平。②土壤颗粒分形维数D值与粉粒、极细砂粒、细砂粒含量呈显著正相关关系,与中砂粒、粗砂粒、极粗砂粒呈显著负相关关系。③随着土层加深,粒径<250 μm的土壤颗粒含量增加,粒径>250μm的土壤颗粒含量减少;土壤颗粒分形维数D值随土层加深而增大,增大幅度不大。④土壤颗粒分形维数D值与土壤有机质、全氮、速效氮、速效磷含量的关系均未达到显著水平,土壤各养分含量的变化对分形维数D值没有显著影响。[结论] 鄂尔多斯地区杨树低效林下土壤颗粒组成以砂粒为主,土壤分形维数较低,土壤结构极不均匀,这样的土壤结构对杨树的正常生长发育极为不利,不良的土壤结构也在一定程度上导致了低效林的形成,因此在对杨树低效林进行预防和改造时也要改善林下土壤结构。
[Objective] The particle size distribution and fractal characteristics of soil under low-efficiency poplar forests in Ordos region were studied to provide a basis for the cause analysis and transformation of low-efficiency poplar forests in this region
and to provide a reference and decision-making support for the scientific management of poplar plantations.[Methods] We used a Mastersizer 3000 laser diffraction particle size analyzer to measure soil particle size
and a fractal dimension model of soil particle volume to calculate the fractal dimension D
and measured soil nutrients.[Results] ① The main components of soil particles in the low-efficiency poplar forests were fine sand (42.33%)
ultra-fine sand (15.72%)
and medium sand (19.77%). The main soil texture type was sand and the fractal dimension D of the soil particles was in the range of 1.222 5~2.204 5
which was at a low level. ② The fractal dimension D of soil particles was positively correlated with the silt
ultra-fine sand
and fine sand content
but was negatively correlated with the medium sand
coarse sand
and ultra-coarse sand content. ③ With an increase of the soil layer
the soil particle content with particle size <250 microns increased
whereas the soil particle content with particle size >250 microns decreased. The fractal dimension D value of soil particles increased with an increase of the soil layer; however
the increase was not significant. ④ The relationship among the fractal dimension D of soil particles and the soil organic matter
total nitrogen
available nitrogen
and available phosphorus content was not significant
and the change of soil nutrient content had no significant effect on fractal dimension D.[Conclusion] Sand is the main component of soil particles in low-efficiency poplar forests in the Ordos area. The fractal dimension of the soil is low and the soil structure is very uneven. This type of soil structure is very harmful to the normal growth and development of poplar. This poor soil structure leads to the formation of low-efficiency poplar forests to a certain extent. The soil structure under the forest could be improved by prevention and transformation.
冯瑞,郭月峰,张霞,等.敖汉旗两种主要土壤类型的土壤机械组成[J].农业工程,2017,7(6):100-103.
张军红,徐义萍,王文鑫,等.毛乌素沙地油蒿植冠下表层土壤粒径特征分析[J].中南林业科技大学学报,2018,38(6):36-40,55.
董莉丽,郑粉莉.陕北黄土丘陵沟壑区土壤粒径分形特征[J].中国水土保持科学,2009,7(2):35-41.
刘秀珍,李翔,向云,等.树儿梁小流域坝地土壤颗粒的分形特征[J].核农学报,2011,25(2):337-341,381.
徐祥明,覃灵华.西南地区水耕人为土分形特征及与土壤属性的关系[J].西南农业学报,2011,24(5):1838-1843.
缪驰远,汪亚峰,魏欣,等.黑土表层土壤颗粒的分形特征[J].应用生态学报,2007,18(9):1987-1993.
Mandelbrot B. How long is the coast of Britain?:Statistical self-similarity and fractional dimension[J].Science, 1967,156(3775):636-638.
Manderlbrot B B. Fractals:Form, chance and dimension[M]. San Francisco:Free-man,1977.
解军强.分形理论的发展研究概述[J].科教导刊,2013(25):184-185.
曹樱子,王小丹.藏北高寒草原土壤粒径分布分形维数特征[J].山地学报,2014,32(4):438-443.
赵清贺,卢训令,汤茜,等.黄河中下游河岸缓冲带土壤粒径分形特征[J].中国水土保持科学,2016,14(5):37-46.
徐国策,李占斌,李鹏,等.丹江中游典型小流域土壤颗粒及分形特征[J].中国水土保持科学,2013,11(5):28-35.
国家林业局.中华人民共和国林业行业标准:全国营造林综合核查技术规程(LY/T 2083-2013)[S].北京:中国标准出版社,2013.
刘美龄,叶勇,曹长青,等.海南东寨港红树林土壤粒径分布的分形特征及其影响因素[J].生态学杂志,2008,27(9):1557-1561.
晋永芬,张兰芳,杭欣宇,等.鄂尔多斯市旱作农业概况及其发展对策[J].科学种养,2015(2):243.
吕贻忠,李保国,胡克林,等.鄂尔多斯夏初不同地形土壤水分的空间变异[J].中国农业大学学报,2002,7(5):38-43.
蒙吉军,赵春红,刘明达.基于土地利用变化的区域生态安全评价:以鄂尔多斯市为例[J].自然资源学报,2011,26(4):578-590.
赵盼盼,李国旗,邵文山,等.封育对荒漠草原苦豆子群落土壤粒径分形特征的影响[J].西北植物学报,2017,37(6):1234-1241.
李国旗,赵盼盼,邵文山,等.封育对荒漠草原沙芦草群落土壤粒径分形维数及理化性质的影响[J].草地学报,2018,26(3):551-558.
邓良基,林正雨,高雪松,等.成都平原土壤颗粒分形特征及应用[J].土壤通报,2008,39(1):38-42.
白一茹,汪有科.黄土丘陵区土壤粒径分布单重分形和多重分形特征[J].农业机械学报,2012,43(5):43-48,42.
杜海燕,周智彬,刘凤山,等.绿洲化过程中阿拉尔垦区土壤粒径分形变化特征[J].干旱区研究,2013,30(4):615-622.
曾宪勤,刘和平,路炳军,等.北京山区土壤粒径分布分形维数特征[J].山地学报,2008,26(1):65-70.
齐雁冰,常庆瑞,惠泱河.人工植被恢复荒漠化逆转过程中土壤颗粒分形特征[J].土壤学报,2007,44(3):566-570.
甘凤玲,王涛,何丙辉,等.汶川震区不同植被下土壤组成及其分型特征[J].水土保持研究,2018,25(1):84-91.
刘继龙,马孝义,付强,等.陕西杨凌土壤粒径分布体积分形维数特征分析及预测[J].灌溉排水学报,2012,31(3):59-62,67.
王文彪,高君亮.阴山北麓不同土地利用类型表土颗粒分形特征[J].安徽农业科学,2011,39(18):10899-10902.
高传友,赵清贺,刘倩.北江干流河岸带不同植被类型土壤粒径分形特征[J].水土保持研究,2016,23(3):37-42.
高玉寒,姚云峰,李龙,等.赤峰市敖汉旗4种类型土壤机械组成及分形维数的垂直分布特征[J].江苏农业科学,2017,45(11):236-239.
王富,贾志军,董智,等.不同生态修复措施下水库水源涵养区土壤粒径分布的分形特征[J].水土保持学报,2009,23(5):113-117.
吕圣桥. 黄河三角洲滩地土壤颗粒分形特征及其与土壤性质的相关性研究[D].泰安:山东农业大学,2012.
肖冬冬,史正涛,刘新有,等.西双版纳橡胶林土壤颗粒体积分形维数特征[J].热带作物学报,2017,38(5):817-823.
0
浏览量
1009
下载量
0
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010802024621