1. 湖南工程学院 管理学院,湖南,湘潭,411104
2. 湖南工程学院 计算机与通信学院,湖南,湘潭,411104
纸质出版:2019
移动端阅览
周子英, 向昌盛, 米振华. 长株潭城市群都市农业可持续发展综合评价[J]. 水土保持通报, 2019,39(5):278-284.
Zhou Ziying, Xiang Changsheng, Mi Zhenhua. Comprehensive Evaluation of Sustainable Development of Urban Agriculture in Changsha-Zhuzhou-Xiangtan Urban Agglomeration[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2019, 39(5): 278-284.
周子英, 向昌盛, 米振华. 长株潭城市群都市农业可持续发展综合评价[J]. 水土保持通报, 2019,39(5):278-284. DOI: 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2019.05.039.
Zhou Ziying, Xiang Changsheng, Mi Zhenhua. Comprehensive Evaluation of Sustainable Development of Urban Agriculture in Changsha-Zhuzhou-Xiangtan Urban Agglomeration[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2019, 39(5): 278-284. DOI: 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2019.05.039.
[目的] 在借鉴国内外有关都市农业可持续发展评价的基础上,全面考虑都市农业的多功能性,构建都市农业可持续发展评价指标体系,对长株潭城市群都市农业可持续发展进行评价,为城市群建设提供理论支撑。[方法] 首先利用层次分析法确定各指标的主观权重,然后利用指标数据的变化情况,求取各指标的熵权,利用主观权重与熵权确定各指标的复合权重,最后利用TOPSIS模型对2010-2017年长株潭城市群都市农业可持续发展水平进行评价与分析。[结果] ①2010-2017年间,长株潭城市群都市农业可持续发展水平相对贴近度由2010年的0.306 5增加到了2017年的0.523 9;②各分功能的相对贴近度变化趋势各异,但总体呈上升的发展态势。[结论] 长株潭城市群都市农业可持续发展水平呈波动上升的发展态势,可持续水平由"低水平"上升为"中等水平";都市农业的经济功能已呈现出逐步弱化与边缘化的趋势,越来越多地展示出了都市农业的社会功能、生态功能与示范教育功能。为了进一步促进长株潭城市群都市农业的可持续发展水平,在进行长株潭城市群建设规划时,必须保持一定数据与规模的都市农业景观用地,保证都市农业生态系统结构完整,同时需要加大经济功能所占比重,以保持各分功能更为协调。
[Objective] Based on the evaluation of sustainable development of urban agriculture in China and abroad
and considering the multi-function of urban agriculture
an evaluation index system for the sustainable development of urban agriculture was constructed to evaluate the sustainable development of urban agriculture in Changsha-Zhuzhou-Xiangtan urban agglomeration and provide theoretical support for the construction of an urban agglomeration.[Methods] First
the subjective weight of each index was determined using the analytic hierarchy process. Then
using the change of index data
the entropy weight of each index was obtained and the composite weight of each index was determined by subjective weight and entropy weight. Finally
the sustainable development level of urban agriculture in the Changsha-Zhuzhou-Xiangtan urban agglomeration from 2010 to 2017 was evaluated and analyzed based on the TOPSIS model.[Results] ① During 2010-2017
the degree of urban agriculture sustainable development in the Changsha-Zhuzhou-Xiangtan urban agglomeration increased from 0.306 5 to 0.523 9. ② The sustainable development level trend for each sub-function was different
but it was on the rise overall.[Conclusion] The sustainable development level of urban agriculture in the Changsha-Zhuzhou-Xiangtan urban agglomeration fluctuated and increased from "low level" to "medium level". The economic function of urban agriculture gradually weakened and became marginalized. Increasingly more urban agriculture showed its social function
ecological function
and demonstration education function. To promote the sustainable development level of urban agriculture in the Changsha-Zhuzhou-Xiangtan urban agglomeration
it is necessary to maintain a certain amount of data and scale of the urban agricultural landscape land during the construction planning of the urban agglomeration
ensure the integrity of urban agricultural ecosystem structure
and increase the proportion of economic functions and develop each sub-function in a more coordinated way.
Christopher R B, Thomas R R J. Agriculture in the City's Countryside[M]. London:Belhaven Press,1992.
任国平,刘黎明,管青春,等.基于变结构协整检验的都市农业景观演变阶段分析[J].农业工程学报,2017,33(24):249-260.
王岱,蔺雪芹,刘旭,等.北京市县域都市农业可持续发展水平动态分异与提升路径[J].地理研究,2014,33(9):1706-1715.
Paolillo P L, Rossati M, Rudini M A. Multivariate applications in the evaluation of the discipline of agriculture:extra-urban spaces and the resistivity index[M]//Geo-Informatics in Resource Management and Sustainable Ecosystem. Berlin, Heidelberg:Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2013:53-65.
Thapa R B, Murayama Y. Land evaluation for peri-urban agriculture using analytical hierarchical process and geographic information system techniques:A case study of Hanoi[J]. Land Use Policy, 2008,25(2):225-239.
Zezza A, Tasciotti L. Urban agriculture, poverty, and food security:Empirical evidence from a sample of developing countries[J]. Food Policy, 2010,35(4):265-273.
Altieri M A, Companioni N, Cañizares K, et al. The greening of the "barrios":Urban agriculture for food security in Cuba[J]. Agriculture and Human Values,1999,16(2):131-140.
齐天真.基于供给侧的都市农业投入产出效率评价与实证[J].统计与决策,2017(17):64-66.
关海玲,宋世琼.基于DEA方法的都市型现代农业发展水平综合评价:以山西为例[J].生产力研究,2013(6):33-36,96.
开燕华,王霞.弹性城市指向下的都市农业多功能动态评价:基于上海市1993-2014年的实证[J].经济体制改革,2017(1):81-88.
李梦桃,周忠学.基于多维评价模型的都市农业多功能发展模式探究[J].中国生态农业学报,2016,24(9):1275-1284.
邓楚雄,谢炳庚,吴永兴,等.上海都市农业可持续发展的定量综合评价[J].自然资源学报,2010,25(9):1577-1588.
张莉侠,马莹,谈平.都市农业发展水平评价研究综述[J].中国农业资源与区划,2015,36(1):44-49.
李满,李世峰,欧阳映鸿.基于熵权法的涿鹿县现代农业发展水平评价分析[J].中国农业大学学报,2014,19(5):236-243.
李玉平,朱琛,张璐璇,等.基于改进层次分析法的水环境生态安全评价与对策:以邢台市为例[J].北京大学学报:自然科学版,2019,55(2):310-316.
郭国平,周超林,吴兵,等.基于DEA-TOPSIS模型的水上应急资源配置效率评价[J].安全与环境学报,2019,19(1):134-139.
王云,周忠学.多功能性的都市农业用地效率评价:以西安市为例[J].经济地理,2014,34(7):129-134.
周子英,张群,张维梅.熵变视角的城市生态系统可持续发展能力评价:以长沙市为例[J].湖南工程学院学报:社会科学版,2016,26(4):8-15.
孙金辉,谢忠胜,陈欢,等.基于层次分析法的北川县环境地质承载力评价[J].水土保持通报,2018,38(4):125-128,2.
武家辉,王维庆,王海云,等.基于综合权重理论和Fuzzy-TOPSIS综合评价的电网静态电压稳定性分析[J].电力系统保护与控制,2018,46(23):77-85.
姜秋香,董玉洁,王子龙,等.基于改进TOPSIS模型的黑龙江省水资源短缺风险评价[J].东北农业大学学报,2018,49(9):61-68.
0
浏览量
960
下载量
0
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010802024621