1. 赣南师范大学 地理与环境工程学院,江西,赣州,341000
2. 华南师范大学 地理科学学院,广州,510631
3. 湖北科技学院 资源环境科学与工程学院, 湖北 咸宁 4371000
纸质出版:2019
移动端阅览
刘光旭, 王小军, 徐新创, 等. 低山丘陵区暴雨洪水特征与洪灾风险评估——以赣江上游为例[J]. 水土保持通报, 2019,39(5):236-241.
Liu Guangxu, Wang Xiaojun, Xu Xinchuang, et al. Characteristics of Rainstorm Flood and Risk Assessment in a Low Mountainous and Hilly Area -A Case Study at Upstream Areas of Ganjiang River[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2019, 39(5): 236-241.
刘光旭, 王小军, 徐新创, 等. 低山丘陵区暴雨洪水特征与洪灾风险评估——以赣江上游为例[J]. 水土保持通报, 2019,39(5):236-241. DOI: 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2019.05.033.
Liu Guangxu, Wang Xiaojun, Xu Xinchuang, et al. Characteristics of Rainstorm Flood and Risk Assessment in a Low Mountainous and Hilly Area -A Case Study at Upstream Areas of Ganjiang River[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2019, 39(5): 236-241. DOI: 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2019.05.033.
[目的] 评估赣江上游洪灾风险,为区域减灾及社会经济发展提供参考。[方法] 从气候和地形等自然条件出发,结合实测资料分析暴雨洪水时空特征;采用层次分析法确定致灾因子危险性、孕灾环境敏感性、承灾体的易损性和防洪救灾能力4个因子的14个指标的权重,借助GIS平台进行风险因子分析和综合风险评估。[结果] 暴雨洪水多集中在3-7月,春夏季暴雨频次占全年的80.4%,洪水频次占95.9%,空间上主要分布在东北大部;致灾因子危险性风险等级东北部高,西部较低;孕灾环境敏感性风险呈带状,总体上中间高四周低;承灾体易损性风险中西,中北部高,四周低;防洪救灾能力西高东低,南高北低,从西南向东北递减;综合风险为中北部、中东部高风险,东南部、西部低风险;各风险等级面积比例存在差异,高风险和较高风险面积占比达37.3%。[结论] 研究区暴雨洪水特征兼具丘陵与平原型特征,暴雨和洪水存在较明显的正相关关系;洪灾风险评估结果与赣江上游区实际基本符合,验证了指标体系及评估模型合理性。
[Objective] This study seeks to assess flood risk to provide reference for regional disaster reduction and socio-economic development in upstream areas of the Ganjiang River.[Methods] The temporal and spatial features data of a rainstorm flood occurring under natural conditions were collected and analyzed. The weights of 14 indicators of 4 factors among risk of disaster-causing factors
sensitivity of disaster-bearing environments
vulnerability of disaster-bearing bodies and the capacity of disaster controls were determined using the analytic hierarchy process (AHP)
and then risk factor analysis and comprehensive risk assessment were carried out in GIS.[Results] The floods were mostly concentrated from March to July in the study area. The rainstorms in spring and summer account for 80.4% of the whole year
while the floods accounted for 95.9%. The floods mainly occurred in the northeast. The hazard levels appear higher in the northeast and lower in the west. The sensitivity of the flood inducing environments bands from the northwest to the northeast. The sensitivity in the middle was a little higher than in surrounding areas. The vulnerability levels were higher in the central and western regions but lower in the surrounding areas. The anti-disaster capacity was decreasing from the southwest to the northeast
higher in the west and the south
lower in the east and the north. The comprehensive risk levels were higher in the north central and eastern regions
but lower in the southeast and west. Areas of each risk level was very different in the proportion. The extremely high and high risk accounted for 37.3%.[Conclusion] Floods in the upstream areas of the Ganjiang River are characterized by floods occurring in both the hilly and plain areas. There is a significant positive correlation between rainstorms and floods. These risk assessment results are consistent with the actual situations observed in the study area in most cases
which verifies indirectly the rationality of the indicators selected and the evaluation model.
国家防汛抗旱总指挥部, 中华人民共和国水利部. 中国水旱灾害公报-2014[M].北京:中国水利水电出版社,2016.
李军,张万宝.宁夏贺兰山地区暴雨洪水及其特性分析[J].中国防汛抗旱,2018,28(4):60-62.
俄有浩,霍治国.长江中下游地区暴雨特征及洪涝淹没风险分析[J].生态学杂志,2016,35(4):1053-1062.
林志东,陈兴伟,林木生,等.东南沿海西溪流域暴雨洪水的时空变化特征[J].山地学报,2017,35(4):488-495.
姚章民,杜勇,张丽娜.珠江流域暴雨天气系统与暴雨洪水特征分析[J].水文,2015,35(2):85-89.
努尔兰·哈再孜,沈永平.新疆阿勒泰地区的洪水特性[J].水文,2014,34(4):74-81.
邹嘉福,刘正伟.昆明城市暴雨洪水特性分析[J].水电能源科学,2013,31(1):42-45,187.
潘娅英,马得莲,张青,等.HBV模型在富春江水库流域临界致灾面雨量确定中的应用[J].水土保持通报,2018,38(6):151-155.
李华威,万庆.小流域山洪灾害危险性分析之降雨指标选取的初步研究[J].地球信息科学学报,2017,19(3):425-435.
李娜,袁雯.上海洪涝灾害发生特征、致灾因子及影响机制研究[J].自然灾害学报,2011,20(1):37-45.
莫建飞,陆甲,李艳兰,等.基于GIS的广西洪涝灾害孕灾环境敏感性评估[J].灾害学,2010,25(4):33-37.
葛鹏,岳贤平.洪涝灾害承灾体易损性的时空变异:以南京市为例[J].灾害学,2013,28(1):107-111.
胡俊锋,杨佩国,杨月巧,等.防洪减灾能力评价指标体系和评价方法研究[J].自然灾害学报,2010,19(3):82-87.
de Risi R, Jalayer F, de Paola F. Meso-scale hazard zoning of potentially flood prone areas[J]. Journal of Hydrology, 2015,527:316-325.
Motevalli A, Vafakhah M. Flood hazard mapping using synthesis hydraulic and geomorphic properties at watershed scale[J]. Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment, 2016,30(7):1889-1900.
石涛,谢五三,张丽,等.暴雨洪涝风险评估的GIS和空间化应用:以芜湖市为例[J].自然灾害学报,2015,24(5):169-176.
Nandi A, Mandal A, Wilson M, et al. Flood hazard mapping in Jamaica using principal component analysis and logistic regression[J]. Environmental Earth Sciences, 2016,75(6):1-16.
朱卫浩,陈霞,邵丽芳,等.基于格网的河北省精细化暴雨洪涝灾害风险区划[J].中国农学通报,2016,32(23):142-147.
万金红,张葆蔚,马建明,等.浙江省钱塘江流域"201106"洪涝灾害调查分析[J].自然灾害学报,2015,24(4):183-189.
曹罗丹,李加林.基于遥感与GIS的浙江省洪涝灾害综合风险评估研究[J].自然灾害学报,2015,24(4):111-119.
刘德林.基于GIS的河南省洪灾风险评价[J].水土保持通报,2014,34(3):126-129.
裴惠娟,陈晋,李雯,等.甘肃省暴雨洪水时空分布及风险评估[J].自然灾害学报,2017,26(3):167-175.
王小军,刘光旭.南方丘陵区流域提取及洪水淹没模拟:以赣江上游为例[J].中国农村水利水电,2017(5):161-165,169.
史培军.再论灾害研究的理论与实践[J].自然灾害学报,1996,5(4):6-17.
黄崇福,郭君,艾福利,等.洪涝灾害风险分析的基本范式及其应用[J].自然灾害学报,2013,22(4):11-23.
Wisner B, Blaikie P, Cannon T, et al. At risk:Natural hazards, people's vulnerability and disasters[M]. (2nd) London:Routledge, 2004.
Davidson R A,Lambert K B.Comparing the hurricane disaster risk of US coastal counties[J].Natural Hazards Review, 2001,2(3):132-142.
单九生,尹洁,张延亭,等.江西致洪暴雨天气特征分析与流域洪涝预报研究[J].暴雨灾害,2007,26(4):311-315.
万金红,陈必真.洪涝灾情评估研究综述[J].防灾科技学院学报,2015,17(4):56-60.
张兴毅,王国梁.基于GIS的江西省洪涝灾害风险区划[J].山西师范大学学报:自然科学版,2014,28(4):68-72.
0
浏览量
1099
下载量
0
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010802024621