1. 吉林大学 建设工程学院,吉林,长春,130000
2. 吉林省地质环境监测总站,吉林,长春,130000
纸质出版:2019
移动端阅览
扈秀宇, 秦胜伍, 窦强, 等. 基于GIS和随机森林模型的泥石流敏感性分析——以吉林省洮南市北部山区为例[J]. 水土保持通报, 2019,39(5):204-210.
Hu Xiuyu, Qin Shengwu, Dou Qiang, et al. Susceptibility Analysis of Debris Flow Based on GIS and Random Forest -A Case Study of a Mountainous Area in Northern Taonan City, Jilin Province[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2019, 39(5): 204-210.
扈秀宇, 秦胜伍, 窦强, 等. 基于GIS和随机森林模型的泥石流敏感性分析——以吉林省洮南市北部山区为例[J]. 水土保持通报, 2019,39(5):204-210. DOI: 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2019.05.028.
Hu Xiuyu, Qin Shengwu, Dou Qiang, et al. Susceptibility Analysis of Debris Flow Based on GIS and Random Forest -A Case Study of a Mountainous Area in Northern Taonan City, Jilin Province[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2019, 39(5): 204-210. DOI: 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2019.05.028.
[目的] 对区域性泥石流敏感性进行分析,为吉林省洮南市泥石流灾害预测研究提出一种高效快捷的分析模型。[方法] 针对现行大多数概率统计模型预测率较低的不足,利用人工智能算法中效果明显的随机森林算法,以吉林省洮南市西北部山区为研究区域,选用高程、坡度、坡向、平面曲率、剖面曲率、河流、归一化差分植被指数、地形湿度指数、土地利用及岩性10个评价因子构建了频率比和随机森林泥石流敏感性评价模型进行对比验证。模型准确性的验证方法采用受试者特征曲线(ROC曲线)及累积频率曲线下面积(area under curve,AUC)。[结果] 随机森林对研究区泥石流敏感性进行分析,并通过GIS将敏感性图分为5个敏感性区域,位于高敏感性区以上的灾害点占82.3%。验证模型成功率及预测率分别为88.4%与90.4%,相较于频率比的成功率及预测率(86.4%和75.1%)效果良好。[结论] 在洮南市北部进行泥石流敏感性分析中,采用随机森林方法进行建模,并利用频率比方法进行对比,结果显示随机森林法结果可靠准确。
[Objective] The susceptibility of regional debris flow was analyzed and an efficient and rapid analysis model proposed for the debris flow disaster prediction research Taonan area of Jilin Province.[Methods] Owing to the current shortcomings of most probabilistic statistical models that have low prediction rates
the random forest algorithm with obvious effect built on an artificial intelligence algorithm was used to study the northwestern mountainous area of Taonan City
Jilin Province. The elevation
slope
aspect
plane curvature
profile curvature
river
normalized difference vegetation index
topographic humidity index
land use
and lithology were selected. A random forest debris flow susceptibility assessment model for the study area was constructed using these factors. The frequency ratio method was used to model and compare with the random forest model. The model effect was verificated using a receiver operating characteristic curve and an area under the curve.[Results] Random forests were used to analyze the sensitivity of debris flow in the study area and were divided into five sensitivity areas by GIS. The disaster points above the high sensitivity area accounted for 82.3%. The success rate and prediction rate of the verification model were 88.4% and 90.4%
respectively
which was better than the success rate and prediction rate of frequency ratio (86.4% and 75.1%).[Conclusion] The sensitivity analysis of debris flow in the Northern Taonan City was performed using the random forest method and compared with the frequency ratio method. The random forest results were reliable and accurate.
Hungr O, McDougall S, Wise M, et al.Magnitude-frequency relationships of debris flows and debris avalanches in relation to slope relief[J].Geomorphology, 2008,96(3/4):355-365.
许冲,戴福初,徐锡伟.汶川地震滑坡灾害研究综述[J].地质论评,2010,56(6):860-874.
谭炳炎.泥石流沟严重程度的数量化综合评判[J].铁道学报,1986,8(2):74-82.
刘希林.泥石流危险度判定的研究[J].灾害学,1988,3(3):10-15.
唐川,刘琼招.中国泥石流灾害强度划分与危险区划探讨[J].中国地质灾害与防治学报,1994,5(S1):30-35,52.
郭瑞,马富存,郭一兵,等.基于层次分析法的泥石流易发性评价[J].东华理工大学学报:自然科学版,2016,39(4):347-351.
鲍春,宋丹青.模糊数学在库区泥石流易发性评价中的应用[J].水资源与水工程学报,2015,26(6):132-136.
蒋庆丰.山坡泥石流的风险性分析与评价研究[D].重庆:西南师范大学,2002.
张以晨,秦胜伍,翟健健,等.基于信息量的长白山地区泥石流易发性评价[J].水文地质工程地质,2018,45(2):150-158.
孙正超.基于GIS和Logistic回归模型的区域泥石流危险性评价[D].成都:西南石油大学, 2016.
齐信,黄波林,刘广宁,等.基于GIS技术和频率比模型的三峡地区秭归向斜盆地滑坡敏感性评价[J].地质力学学报,2017,23(1):97-104.
王国峰.基于遗传神经网络的矿山泥石流危险性评价[D].西安:西安科技大学,2008.
王奕森,夏树涛.集成学习之随机森林算法综述[J].信息通信技术,2018,12(1):49-55.
Breiman L. Random Forests[J]. Machine Learning, 2001,45(1):5-32.
方匡南,吴见彬,朱建平,等.随机森林方法研究综述[J].统计与信息论坛,2011,26(3):32-38.
张彩霞,杨勤科,李锐.基于DEM的地形湿度指数及其应用研究进展[J].地理科学进展,2005,24(6):116-123.
尹超,王艳芳,张爱国.基于NDVI的临汾市植被覆盖动态变化遥感监测研究[J].山西师范大学学报:自然科学版,2011,25(3):125-128.
王全喜,孙鹏举,刘学录,等.基于随机森林算法的耕地面积预测及影响因素重要性分析:以甘肃省庆阳市为例[J].水土保持通报,2018,38(5):341-346.
甄亿位,郝敏,陆宝宏,等.基于随机森林的中长期降水量预测模型研究[J].水电能源科学,2015,33(6):6-10.
Shrestha S, Kang T S, Suwal M. An ensemble model for co-seismic landslide susceptibility using GIS and random forest method[J]. ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information, 2017,6(11):365.
王运生,谢丙炎,万方浩,等.ROC曲线分析在评价入侵物种分布模型中的应用[J].生物多样性,2007,15(4):365-372.
刘润幸.使用SPSS作多变量观察值的ROC曲线分析[J].中国公共卫生,2003,19(9):1151-1152.
刘艺梁,殷坤龙,刘斌.逻辑回归和人工神经网络模型在滑坡灾害空间预测中的应用[J].水文地质工程地质,2010,37(5):92-96.
0
浏览量
1078
下载量
0
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010802024621