广西壮族自治区林业科学研究院,广西,南宁,530002
纸质出版:2019
移动端阅览
彭玉华, 郑威, 谭长强, 等. 广西壮族自治区的台湾桤木混交造林水源涵养功能评价[J]. 水土保持通报, 2019,39(5):98-105.
Peng Yuhua, Zheng Wei, Tan Changqiang, et al. Evaluation of Water Conservation Function of Alnus Formosana Mixed Plantations in Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2019, 39(5): 98-105.
彭玉华, 郑威, 谭长强, 等. 广西壮族自治区的台湾桤木混交造林水源涵养功能评价[J]. 水土保持通报, 2019,39(5):98-105. DOI: 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2019.05.014.
Peng Yuhua, Zheng Wei, Tan Changqiang, et al. Evaluation of Water Conservation Function of Alnus Formosana Mixed Plantations in Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2019, 39(5): 98-105. DOI: 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2019.05.014.
[目的] 研究台湾桤木混交造林的枯落物层和土壤层的水源涵养能力,为台湾桤木在广西壮族自治区的合理经营与利用提供理论依据。[方法] 采用熵权法对台湾桤木×马尾松、台湾桤木×巨尾桉、台湾桤木×红锥及台湾桤木纯林的林分枯落物层和土壤层的水文效应相关因子进行综合评价。[结果] ①枯落物最大持水量最大是台湾桤木×红锥(2:1),台湾桤木×马尾松(1:1)最少;台湾桤木×红锥(1:2)的枯落物有效拦蓄率最大,台湾桤木×红锥(2:1)的枯落物有效拦蓄量最大,台湾桤木×巨尾桉(2:1)的枯落物有效拦蓄率和有效拦蓄量均最小。②台湾桤木混交林土壤容重均明显低于台湾桤木纯林,土壤总孔隙度、毛管孔隙度、自然含水率、最大持水量和毛管持水量均是台湾桤木混交林大于台湾桤木纯林。③采用熵权法计算权重值占比例最大是枯落物最大持水量,最少是土壤毛管孔隙度;台湾桤木不同混交造林模式水源涵养能力综合评价排序为:台湾桤木×巨尾桉(1:2) > 台湾桤木×红锥(2:1) > 台湾桤木×马尾松(1:2) > 台湾桤木×红锥(1:1) > 台湾桤木×巨尾桉(1:1) > 台湾桤木×马尾松(2:1) > 台湾桤木×红锥(1:2) > 台湾桤木×巨尾桉(2:1) > 台湾桤木×马尾松(1:1) > 台湾桤木纯林。[结论] 台湾桤木与马尾松、巨尾桉和红锥混交造林的水源涵养能力均优于台湾桤木纯林。
[Objective] The water conservation ability of the litter and soil layers of Alnus formosana mixed plantations was studied in order to provide a theoretical basis for the rational management and utilization of A. formosana in the Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region.[Methods] The entropy weight method was used to comprehensively evaluate the hydrological effect related factors. The mixed modes included A. formosana and Pinus massoniana
A. formosana and Eucalyptus grandis×urophylla
A. formosana and Castanopsis hystrix
and an A. formosana pure plantation as the control.[Results] ① The maximum water holding capacities of litter were largest in the mixed A. formosana and C. hystrix plantation with a 2:1 ratio and least in the mixed A. formosana and P. massoniana plantation with a 1:1 ratio. The effective retention rate of litter in the mixed A. formosana and C. hystrix plantation (with a 1:2 ratio) was the highest
the effective retention amount in the mixed A. formosana and C. hystrix plantation (with a 2:1 ratio) was the highest
whilst the effective retention rate and amount in the mixed A. formosana and E. grandis×urophylla plantation (2:1) were the lowest. ② The soil bulk density in the mixed plantations was significantly lower than that in the pure forest
however
the total porosity
capillary porosity
natural water content
maximum water holding capacity
and capillary water holding capacity of the soil were all higher in the mixed plantations. ③ The entropy weight method was used to calculate the weight value. The maximum water holding capacity of the litter was the largest
and the soil capillary porosity was the smallest. The comprehensive evaluation of the water conservation ability was ranked as follows:A. formosana and E. grandis×urophylla (1:2) > A. formosana and C. hystrix (2:1) > A. formosana and P. massoniana (1:2) > A. formosana and C. hystrix (1:1) > A. formosana and E. grandis×urophylla (1:1) > A. formosana and P. massoniana (2:1) > A. formosana and C. hystrix (1:2) > A. formosana and E. grandis×urophylla (2:1) > A. formosana and P. massoniana (1:1) > CK.[Conclusion] The water conservation ability of the mixed plantations of A. formosana was better than that of the pure plantation.
杨良辰,张春茹.沿坝地区3种典型林分类型枯落物层与土壤层水源涵养能力综合评价[J].水土保持研究,2018,25(6):177-182.
马成武.不同树种水源涵养能力的研究[J].现代农业科技,2018(3):148,151.
魏文俊,尤文忠,赵刚,等.退化柞蚕林封育对枯落物和表层土壤持水效能的影响[J].生态学报,2016,36(3):721-728.
孙浩,刘晓勇,何齐发,等.修河上游流域4种森林类型的水源涵养功能评价[J].水土保持研究,2017,24(4):337-341,348.
陈继东,周长亮,李惠丽.接坝地区9种典型林分类型枯落物层和土壤层水文效应[J].水土保持研究,2017,24(6):216-221,226.
彭玉华,谭长强,郑威,等.单性木兰生存群落凋落物及土壤水文生态效应[J].水土保持通报,2016,36(5):119-125,130.
Dunkerley D. Percolation through leaf litter:What happens during rainfall events of varying intensity?[J].Journal of Hydrology, 2015,525:737-746.
冯宜明,李毅,曹秀文,等.甘肃亚高山云杉人工林土壤特性及水源涵养功能对林分密度的响应特征[J].自然资源学报,2018,33(9):1529-1541.
Bruijnzeel L A. Hydrological functions of tropical forests:Not seeing the soil for the trees?[J]. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 2004,104(1):185-228.
Dietz J, Hölscher D, Leuschner C, et al. Rainfall partitioning in relation to forest structure in differently managed montane forest stands in Central Sulawesi, Indonesia[J].Forest Ecology and Management, 2006,237(1):170-178.
Santos Terra M D C N, de Mello C R, de Mello J M, et al. Stemflow in a neotropical forest remnant:Vegetative determinants, spatial distribution and correlation with soil moisture[J]. Trees, 2018,32(1):323-335.
赵磊,王兵,蔡体久,等.江西大岗山不同密度杉木林枯落物持水与土壤贮水能力研究[J].水土保持学报,2013,27(1):203-208,246.
贺淑霞,李叙勇,莫菲,等.中国东部森林样带典型森林水源涵养功能[J].生态学报,2011,31(12):3285-3295.
塔莉,杨新兵,朱辰光,等.华北土石山区森林枯落物与土壤水文效应研究[J].河北农业大学学报,2015,38(3):59-63.
彭玉华,谭长强,何琴飞,等.台湾桤木与不同树种混交初期土壤理化性质的对比分析[J].中南林业科技大学学报,2018,38(11):22-28.
涂志华,范志平,孙学凯,等.大伙房水库流域不同植被类型枯落物层和土壤层水文效应[J].水土保持学报,2019,33(1):127-133.
王梓默,何怀江,林士杰,等.吉林省西部不同林分类型凋落物与土壤持水能力研究[J].吉林林业科技,2019,48(1):21-26,33.
宣立辉,康凡,谷建才,等.冀北地区典型林分枯落物层与土壤层的水文效应[J].水土保持研究,2018,25(4):86-91.
彭玉华,黄小荣,申文辉,等.林型差异对土壤理化性状及其持水能力的影响[J].中南林业科技大学学报,2017,37(8):1-5,17.
孙立博,余新晓,陈丽华,等.坝上高原杨树人工林的枯落物及土壤水源涵养功能退化[J].水土保持学报,2019,33(1):104-110.
0
浏览量
1025
下载量
0
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010802024621