1. 贵州师范大学 喀斯特研究院/地理与环境科学学院,贵州,贵阳,550001
2. 国家喀斯特石漠化防治工程技术研究中心,贵州,贵阳,550001
纸质出版:2019
移动端阅览
汤云涛, 周忠发, 朱粲粲, 等. 贵州省绥阳县麻黄洞土壤渗透水-洞穴水元素变化特征及气候响应[J]. 水土保持通报, 2019,39(5):67-76.
Tang Yuntao, Zhou Zhongfa, Zhu Cancan, et al. Characteristics of Soil Infiltration Water-Cave Water Elements and Climate Response Analysis in Mahuang Cave of Suiyang County, Guizhou Province[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2019, 39(5): 67-76.
汤云涛, 周忠发, 朱粲粲, 等. 贵州省绥阳县麻黄洞土壤渗透水-洞穴水元素变化特征及气候响应[J]. 水土保持通报, 2019,39(5):67-76. DOI: 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2019.05.010.
Tang Yuntao, Zhou Zhongfa, Zhu Cancan, et al. Characteristics of Soil Infiltration Water-Cave Water Elements and Climate Response Analysis in Mahuang Cave of Suiyang County, Guizhou Province[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2019, 39(5): 67-76. DOI: 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2019.05.010.
[目的
]
探究白云岩洞穴上覆土壤渗透水-洞穴水水化学元素变化特征及相互关系,揭示岩溶水Ca,Mg,Sr元素比值变化与洞外气候的响应关系。[方法
]
以贵州省绥阳县双河洞洞穴系统中的麻黄洞为研究对象,通过麻黄洞4个洞穴水点和上覆3个土壤点土壤渗透水的定期监测、采样和室内实验,并运用统计分析方法和元素比值法对各监测指标进行比较分析。[结果
]
①麻黄洞上覆土壤渗透水主要水化学指标表现为旱季 > 雨季、洞穴水主要水化学指标表现为雨季 > 旱季的季节性变化特征。②洞穴水EC,Ca
2+
,Mg
2+
,HCO
3
-
,Sr
2+
离子浓度约为土壤渗透水的2~6倍,表明表层岩溶带岩溶过程对洞穴水水化学元素具有重要影响。③土壤渗透水对地表降雨和温度变化具有积极响应,旱季滞留于土壤中的大量矿质元素是导致4月份土壤渗透水中Ca,Mg,Sr浓度出现高值的主要原因。④洞穴水Mg/Ca、Sr/Ca比值变化及其相关性,反映了洞穴水受到来源、水-岩相互作用、洞穴水脱气沉积和先期方解石沉淀过程(PCP)等机制影响的协同性及洞穴上覆主要岩溶过程差异,因此其比值变化能够间接表现洞外温度和降雨变化。[结论
]
土壤渗透水、洞穴水水化学元素具有明显的月间波动和季节性变化特征,且监测点间具有显著差异。两种类型水Ca,Mg,Sr比值变化及相关性对地表降雨和温度变化具有积极响应。
[Objective] The characteristics and relationships of hydrochemistry in soil infiltration water (SIW) were studied in order to reveal the relationship between the changing ratios of Ca
Mg
and Sr in the karst water and the climate outside the cave.[Methods] Regularly monitoring
sampling
and experimenting on the four cave water pots and the overlying three SIW points in Mahuang cave
Suiyang County
Guizhou Province. Then
statistical analysis methods and comparative analysis of various monitoring indicators by the element ratio method were used.[Results] ① The main hydrochemistry indexes of the SIW showed dry season > rainy season
whilst the cave water showed the opposite characteristics. ② The concentration of EC
Ca2+
Mg2+
HCO3-
and Sr2+ in the cave water was about 2~6 times higher than that of the SIW
which indicated that the karst process in epikarst had an important influence on the hydrochemistry elements in the cave. ③ The SIW had a positive response to surface rainfall and temperature changes
the large amounts of mineral elements retained in the soil during the dry season was the main reason for the high concentration of Ca
Mg
and Sr in the SIW in April. ④ The ratios of Mg/Ca and Sr/Ca in the cave water and their correlations reflected the synergy of the cave water by source
water-rock interaction
dewatering deposition of the cave water
prior calcite precipitation (PCP) process
and the main karst process of cave overlying. Therefore
the ratio changes can indirectly show the temperature outside the cave and changes in rainfall.[Conclusion] The hydrochemistry of the SIW and cave water have obvious characteristics of seasonal changes
there are differences between the monitoring pots
and there are significant differences between the monitoring points. The changes in the Ca
Mg
and Sr ratios of the two types of water and their correlations have positive responses to surface rainfall and temperature changes.
Banner J L, Musgrove M, Asmerom Y, et al. High-resolution temporal record of Holocene ground-water chemistry:Tracing links between climate and hydrology[J]. Geology, 1996,24(11):1049.
袁道先.岩溶地区的地质环境和水文生态问题[J].南方国土资源,2003(1):22-25.
向晓晶,李廷勇,王建力,等.重庆芙蓉洞上覆基岩、土壤元素分布特征及其对洞穴滴水水化学影响[J].中国岩溶,2011,30(2):193-199.
Frumkin A, Stein M. The Sahara-East Mediterranean dust and climate connection revealed by strontium and uranium isotopes in a Jerusalem speleothem[J]. Earth and Planetary Science Letters, 2004,217(3/4):451-464.
Dorale J A, Liu Zaihua. Limitations of Hendy Test criteria in judging the paleoclimatic suitability of speleothems and the need forreplication[J]. Journal of Cave and Karst Studies,2009,71(1):73-80.
Baker A, Genty D, Fairchild I J. Hydrological characterisation of stalagmite dripwaters at Grotte de Villars, Dordogne, by the analysis of inorganic species and luminescent organic matter[J]. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 2000,4(3):439-449.
李廷勇,李红春,李俊云,等.重庆芙蓉洞洞穴沉积物δ
13
C,δ
18
O特征及意义[J].地质论评,2008,54(5):712-720.
曾泽,蒋勇军,吕现福,等.重庆雪玉洞洞穴滴水水文地球化学时空变化特征及其环境意义[J].环境科学,2018,39(6):2641-2650.
李俊云,李廷勇,王建力,等.重庆芙蓉洞土壤带Mg和Sr元素特征及其环境意义[J].中国科学:地球科学,2013,43(10):1667-1676.
Zeng Guangneng, Luo Weijun, Wang Shijie, et al. Hydrogeochemical and climatic interpretations of isotopic signals from precipitation to drip waters in Liangfeng Cave, Guizhou Province, China[J]. Environmental Earth Sciences, 2015,74(2):1509-1519.
李坡,贺卫.双河洞地质公园研究[M].贵阳:贵州人民出版社,2008.
韦跃龙,罗书文,陈伟海,等.贵州绥阳地质公园白云岩喀斯特景观特征及其形成演化分析[J].地球学报,2018,39(3):365-383.
Milanolo S, Gabrovšek F. Estimation of carbon dioxide flux degassing from percolating waters in a Karst cave:Case study from Bijambare cave,Bosnia and Herzegovina[J]. Geochemistry,2015,75(4):465-474.
张结,周忠发,汪炎林,等.短时间高强度旅游活动下洞穴CO
2
的变化特征及对滴水水文地球化学的响应[J].地理学报,2018,73(9):1687-1701.
殷超,周忠发,田衷珲,等.岩溶地区主量元素地球化学特征及其迁移规律:以贵州双河洞为例[J].水土保持学报,2018,32(1):303-311,319.
殷超,周忠发,田衷珲,等.土壤CO
2
与喀斯特洞穴CO
2
季节变化响应分析[J].水土保持学报,2017,31(4):304-310,337.
张结,周忠发,潘艳喜,等.织金洞土壤渗透水-洞穴滴水元素的时空变化特征[J].水土保持研究,2017,24(4):355-361.
朱小龙,罗维均,王世杰.贵州凉风洞洞穴系统锶同位素特征[J].地球化学,2018,47(2):209-216.
曹明达,周忠发,张结,等.白云岩喀斯特洞穴水理化性质特征及其环境指示研究:以绥阳双河洞为例[J].地球化学,2017,46(1):87-97.
袁道先.论岩溶环境系统[J].中国岩溶,1988,7(3):179-187.
刘英俊, 励明, 兆麟,等.元素地球化学[M].北京:科学出版社,1984.
班凤梅,潘根兴,蔡炳贵,等.北京石花洞洞穴滴水中硫酸根浓度的时空变化及其意义[J].中国岩溶,2009,28(3):243-248.
王新中,班凤梅,潘根兴.洞穴滴水地球化学的空间和时间变化及其控制因素:以北京石花洞为例[J].第四纪研究,2005,25(2):258-264.
Riechelmann S, Schröder-Ritzrau A, Spötl C, et al. Sensitivity of Bunker Cave to climatic forcings highlighted through multi-annual monitoring of rain-,soil-,and dripwaters[J]. Chemical Geology, 2017,449:194-205.
Faimon J, Bodláková R, Pracny P, et al. Transfer of climatic variables by dripwater:A case study from Katerinská Cave (Moravian Karst)[J]. Environmental Earth Sciences, 2016,75(16):1151.
周运超,王世杰.洞穴滴水的水文地球化学过程:贵州犀牛洞的研究[J].地球与环境,2005,33(2):23-30.
Goede A, Vogel J C. Trace element variations and dating of a Late Pleistocene Tasmanian speleothem[J]. Palaeogeography, 1991,88(1/2):121-131.
Mc Donald J, Drysdale R, Hill D, et al. The hydrochemical response of cave drip waters to sub-annual and inter-annual climate variability, Wombeyan Caves, SE Australia[J].Chemical Geology, 2007,244(3/4):605-623.
0
浏览量
1049
下载量
0
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010802024621