1. 南京农业大学 公共管理学院,江苏,南京,210095
2. 内蒙古农业大学 沙漠治理学院,内蒙古,呼和浩特,010019
3. 西宁市城市规划设计研究院,青海,西宁,810008
4. 内蒙古自治区多伦县林业局, 内蒙古 多伦,027300
纸质出版:2019
移动端阅览
周佳宁, 秦富仓, 邹伟, 等. 华北农牧交错区LUCC对生态系统服务及生态环境质量的影响——以内蒙古自治区多伦县为例[J]. 水土保持通报, 2019,39(4):249-255.
Zhou Jianing, Qin Fucang, Zou Wei, et al. Response of Land Use/Cover Change to Ecosystem Servives and Ecological Environ-ment Quality in Agro-pastoral Transitional Zone of Northern China—Taking Duolun County of Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region as a Case Study[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2019, 39(4): 249-255.
周佳宁, 秦富仓, 邹伟, 等. 华北农牧交错区LUCC对生态系统服务及生态环境质量的影响——以内蒙古自治区多伦县为例[J]. 水土保持通报, 2019,39(4):249-255. DOI: 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2019.04.039.
Zhou Jianing, Qin Fucang, Zou Wei, et al. Response of Land Use/Cover Change to Ecosystem Servives and Ecological Environ-ment Quality in Agro-pastoral Transitional Zone of Northern China—Taking Duolun County of Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region as a Case Study[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2019, 39(4): 249-255. DOI: 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2019.04.039.
[目的]探究华北农牧交错区土地利用/覆被变化(LUCC)对区域生态环境的影响,为类似地区国土空间用途管制和生态文明建设提供理论参考。[方法]基于华北典型农牧交错区内蒙古多伦县2004年、2009年和2014年3期土地利用现状数据及其变更调查资料,获取该区2004-2014年LUCC时空数据。参考Costanza和谢高地等的研究成果,选取生态系统服务价值、生态环境质量指数和LUCC生态贡献率等,构建LUCC与生态环境质量评价体系。[结果]①2004-2014年,研究区土地利用/覆被类型发生明显改变。②生态系统服务价值总量不断提高,主要由林地增加而来;草地、耕地、水域和未利用地生态服务价值的减少在一定程度上削弱了这种增加趋势;10 a来研究区各土地利用/覆被类型生态系统服务价值变化与各自面积变化规律一致。③从生态环境质量指数变化来看,区域生态环境质量不断改善。但从变化细节上分析,生态环境存在改善和恶化双向变动;草地转向耕地和建设用地是该区生态环境恶化的主导因素,未利用地向草地和林地转换则促进生态环境质量的改善。[结论]生态文明建设过程中要切实重视生态脆弱区土地利用变化对区域生态环境之影响;从提高土地利用效率,加强"山水田林湖草"生命共同体建设,构建合理的国土空间规划体系入手,引导区域人口、经济、资源和环境持续高质量发展。
[Objective] The impacts of land use/cover change(LUCC) on the regional ecological environment in agro-pastoral transitional zone in Northern China were studied in order to provide a theoretical reference for future land use in similar areas.[Methods] Based on the changing survey information and land use data of Duolun County
Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region in 2004
2009 and 2014
the spatio-temporal data from 2004 to 2014 was obtained. And consulting the research results of Costanza and Gao et al
the ecosystem service values
ecological environment quality index and the contribution proportions of land use/cover types were selected
to build the assessment system between LUCC and ecological environment qualty.[Results] ① The land use/cover types had obviously changed in 2004-2014. ② The total value of ecosystem services kept improving and mainly came from woodland. While the reduction of ecological service values of grassland
farmland
water area and unused land weakened the increasing trend in some extent
the change rules of ecosystem service values were similar to area changes respectively. ③ From the point of ecological environment quality index changes
the ecological environment quality of this study area improved. But from the change details
this change had two-way driving mechanism. Grassland transferred to farmland and construction land was the dominant factor of degradation of the ecological environment
while the unused land transferred to grassland and woodland promoted the improvement of the ecological environment quality.[Conclusion] In the process of ecological civilization construction
it should attach great importance to the impact of land use change on regional ecological environment in ecologically fragile areas
and guide the sustainable and high-quality development of regional population
economy
resources and environment by improving the efficiency of land use
strengthening the construction of "mountain
paddy field
forest
lake and grass" life community and building a reasonable land and space planning system.
尹登玉,张全景,翟腾腾.山东省土地利用变化及其对生态系统服务价值的影响[J].水土保持通报,2018,38(5):134-143.
Daily G C. Nature's Service:Societal Dependence on Natural Ecosystems[M]. Washington D C:Island Press, 1997.
李静怡,王艳慧.吕梁地区生态环境质量与经济贫困的空间耦合特征[J].应用生态学报,2014,25(6):1715-1724.
刘亚茹,王聪,严力蛟.华北平原农区土地利用变化对生态系统服务的影响:以河南省商丘市为例[J].应用生态学报,2018,29(5):1597-1606.
高吉喜,张龙江.优化县域空间开发格局推进县域生态文明建设[J].中国发展,2016,16(6):57-60.
Bjorklund J. Limburg K, Rydberg T. Impact of production intensity on the ability of the agricultural landscape to generate ecosystem services:An example from Swden[J]. Ecological Economics, 1999,29(2):269-291.
Dai A G. Increasing drought under global warming in observations and models[J]. Nature Climate Change, 2013,3(1):52-58.
管卫华,孙明坤,陆玉麒.1986-2008年中国区域环境质量变化差异研究[J].环境科学,2011,32(3):609-618.
杨燕玲.新疆各地州市土地利用变化及驱动力分析[J].水土保持研究,2006,13(5):166-168.
熊鹰,张方明,龚长安,等.LUCC影响下湖南省生态系统服务价值时空演变[J].长江流域资源与环境,2018,27(6):1397-1408.
黄露,周伟,李浩然,等.土地利用/覆被变化对鄂尔多斯市草地生态系统净初级生产力的影响[J].水土保持通报,2018,38(4):46-52,59.
李旭亮,杨礼箫,田伟,等.中国北方农牧交错带土地利用/覆盖变化研究综述[J].应用生态学报,2018,29(10):3487-3495.
赵艳霞,刘欣,秦彦杰,等.河北省农牧交错区LUCC及其对生态脆弱性的影响[J].水土保持研究,2011,18(5):205-211.
韦庆,卢文喜,刘佳雪.农牧交错区生态环境系统优化研究[J].生态经济,2013(5):140-143.
Yi H, Güneralp, Burak, Filippi A M, et al. Impacts of land change on ecosystem services in the San Antonio River basin, Texas, from 1984 to 2010[J]. Ecological Economics, 2017, 135:125-135.
徐冬平,赵波,李同昇,等.中国北方农牧交错区水资源承载力动态仿真研究:以内蒙古通辽市科尔沁区为例[J].水土保持通报,2017,37(1):262-269.
Costanza R, d'Arege R, de Groot R, et al. The value of the world's ecosystem services and natual capital[J]. Nature,1997,387(6630):253-260.
谢高地,鲁春霞,冷允法,等.青藏高原生态资产的价值评估[J].自然资源学报,2003,18(2):189-196.
秦富仓,周佳宁,刘佳,等.内蒙古多伦县土地利用动态变化及驱动力[J].干旱区资源与环境,2016,30(6):31-37.
段瑞娟,郝晋珉,张洁瑕.北京区位土地利用与生态服务价值变化研究[J].农业工程学报,2006,22(9):21-28.
0
浏览量
1085
下载量
4
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010802024621