1. 西安理工大学 西安理工大学省部共建西北旱区生态水利国家重点实验室,陕西,西安,710048
2. 绍兴市汤浦水库有限公司, 浙江 上虞,312364
纸质出版:2019
移动端阅览
李奇宸, 王敏, 万甜, 等. 基于LUCC的汤浦水库流域生态价值变化过程研究[J]. 水土保持通报, 2019,39(4):184-189.
Li Qichen, Wang Min, Wan Tian, et al. Change Process of Ecological Value of Tangpu Reservoir Basin Based on LUCC[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2019, 39(4): 184-189.
李奇宸, 王敏, 万甜, 等. 基于LUCC的汤浦水库流域生态价值变化过程研究[J]. 水土保持通报, 2019,39(4):184-189. DOI: 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2019.04.029.
Li Qichen, Wang Min, Wan Tian, et al. Change Process of Ecological Value of Tangpu Reservoir Basin Based on LUCC[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2019, 39(4): 184-189. DOI: 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2019.04.029.
[目的]探究水库开发建设及管理活动对汤浦水库流域土地利用及生态环境效应的影响,为水源地水库污染防治及运行管理提供参考。[方法]通过ENVI遥感解译水库流域从建库前至今5个不同时期的土地利用状况,分析水库流域LUCC转移矩阵和生态价值指数,并基于ArcGIS空间分析,对流域内主要污染监测控制区进行识别,同时对水库流域内现有居民搬迁后流域生态价值指数变化趋势进行预测。[结果]流域主要LUCC表现为林地-草地-林地;近20 a流域生态价值指数呈N字形趋势,在2008年达到最高,流域中部山地林区的生态价值指数高于其他区域且生态价值较为稳定;流域重点监控区应设在沿S212省道东西走向一段及王坛镇区域;逐步实施流域生态搬迁以后,流域相对生态价值指数上升趋势先慢后快。搬迁地的生态价值指数由0.015增加至0.081,相应的,全流域的生态价值指数提高11.2%。[结论]水库流域近20 a生态环境保护良好,退耕还林工程的实施以及人类活动是影响水源地水库保护区生境质量变化的主要原因。
[Objective] The impacts of Tangpu reservoir development and management activities on watershed land use and eco-environmental effects were studied in order to provide reference for pollution prevention and operation management of water source reservoirs.[Methods] Through ENVI remote sensing interpretation of the land use status of the reservoir basin in five different periods
the LUCC transfer matrix and ecological value index of the reservoir basin were analyzed. Based on the spatial analysis of ArcGIS
the main pollution monitoring and control areas in the basin were identified
and the trend of the ecological value index of the basin after the relocation of existing residents in the reservoir basin was predicted.[Results] The main LUCC in the basin was forest land-grassland-forest land; the ecological value index of the basin in the past 20 years showed an "N" shape trend
which reached the highest in 2008; The ecological value index of mountainous forest areas in the basin was higher than other areas and the ecological value was relatively stable; The key monitoring area of the basin should be located along the east-west section of the S212 provincial road and the area of Wangtan Town
after the implementation of the ecological resettlement of the basin
the relative ecological value index of the basin would increase slowly then quickly. The ecological value index of relocation increased from 0.015 to 0.084 and the ratio of whole basin increased 11.2%.[Conclusion] The reservoir had been in good ecological environment for nearly 20 years. The implementation of the project of returning farmland to forests and human activities were the main reasons affecting the changes in habitat quality of reservoirs in water source areas.
Raju R, Zhang Y, Basanta P, et al. Land use and land cover dynamics and assessing the ecosystem service values in the Trans-Boundry Gandaki River basin, Central Himalayas[J]. Sustainability, 2018,10(52):3052-3074.
Wang Xuechao, Dong Xiaobin, Liu Huiming, et al. Linking land use change, ecosystem services and human well-being:A case study of the Manas River basin of Xinjiang, China[J]. Ecosystem Services, 2017,27:113-123.
王行斌.水库建设过程中生态修复与水土保持生态分析研究[J].环境与发展,2018,30(2):143-144.
Yu Zhilei, Qin Tianling, Yan Dengming, et al. The impact on the ecosystem services value of the ecological shelter zone reconstruction in the upper reaches basin of the Yangtze River in China[J]. Public Health, 2018,15(10):2273-2292.
杨新文.水库建设对生态环境的影响分析[J].科技与创新,2014(1):147-147.
童笑笑,陈春娣,吴胜军,等.三峡库区澎溪河消落带植物群落分布格局及生境影响[J].生态学报,2018,38(2):571-580.
汤傅佳,黄震方,徐冬,等.水库型旅游地生态安全时空分异及其关键影响因子分析:以溧阳市天目湖为例[J].长江流域资源与环境,2018,27(5):1114-1123.
田锡文,王新军,卡迪罗夫K G,等.近40年凯拉库姆库区土地利用/覆盖变化及景观格局分析[J].农业工程学报,2014,30(6):232-241.
刘冰,樊勇,李清飞,等.基于土地类型的水库污染源解析及生态价值研究[J].环境科学与技术,2017,40(2):31-38.
赵明月.基于土地利用的水府庙水库流域生态安全评价与生态调控研究[D].辽宁大连:辽宁师范大学,2015.
Costanza R, d'Arge R, Groot R D, et al. The value of the world's ecosystem services and natural capital[J]. World Environment, 1997, 25(1):3-15.
Rwanga S S, Ndambuki J M. Accuracy assessment of land use/land cover classification using remote sensing and GIS[J]. International Journal of Geosciences, 2017,8(4):611-622.
田鹏,史小丽,李加林,等.杭州市土地利用变化及生态风险评价[J].水土保持通报,2018,38(4):280-287.
范丽娟,田广星.1995-2015年上海市土地利用及其景观格局变化[J].水土保持通报,2018,38(1),287-292.
廖顺宝,岳艳琳.基于时序NDVI图谱库提高土地覆盖分类精度的方法[J].农业工程学报,2018,34(7):241-248.
彭建,王仰麟,张源,等.滇西北生态脆弱区土地利用变化及其生态效应:以云南省永胜县为例[J].地理学报,2004,59(4):629-638.
马倩.新疆甘家湖湿地土地利用变化及其生态环境效应[J].干旱区资源与环境,2012,26(1):189-193.
四川省统计局.四川省统计年鉴[M].北京:中国统计出版社,2003.
王成,魏朝富,邵景安,等.区域生态服务价值对土地利用变化的响应:以重庆市沙坪坝区为例[J].应用生态学报,2006,17(8):1485-1489.
谢高地,鲁春霞,冷允法,等.青藏高原生态资产的价值评估[J].自然资源学报,2003,18(2):189-196.
ZHAO Zhilong, WU Xue, ZHANG Yili, et al. Assessment of changes in the value of ecosystem services in the Koshi River basin, Central High Himalayas based on land cover changes and the CA-Markov model[J].资源与生态学报:英文版,2017,8(1):67-76.
万利,孙丽慧,谭靖,等.北京郊区土地利用变化及其生态效应研究[J].水土保持研究,2015,22(5):92-99.
0
浏览量
860
下载量
1
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010802024621