1. 西南大学 地理科学学院,重庆,400715
2. 安顺学院 资源与环境工程学院,贵州,安顺,561000
3. 西南大学 三峡库区生态环境教育部重点实验室,重庆,400715
4. 贵州省普定喀斯特生态系统观测研究站, 贵州 普定,562100
纸质出版:2019
移动端阅览
殷清慧, 谢世友, 蔡先立. 喀斯特石漠化皆伐迹地不同微地形和小生境下的土壤侵蚀差异[J]. 水土保持通报, 2019,39(4):44-47.
Yin Qinghui, Xie Shiyou, Cai Xianli. Differences of Soil Erosion Between Micro-topography and Microhabitat in Clear-cutting Site of Karst Rocky Desertification Area[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2019, 39(4): 44-47.
殷清慧, 谢世友, 蔡先立. 喀斯特石漠化皆伐迹地不同微地形和小生境下的土壤侵蚀差异[J]. 水土保持通报, 2019,39(4):44-47. DOI: 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2019.04.007.
Yin Qinghui, Xie Shiyou, Cai Xianli. Differences of Soil Erosion Between Micro-topography and Microhabitat in Clear-cutting Site of Karst Rocky Desertification Area[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2019, 39(4): 44-47. DOI: 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2019.04.007.
[目的]探讨喀斯特山区皆伐迹地不同微地形、小生境下土壤侵蚀的差异,为喀斯特皆伐迹地生态修复及防治提供依据。[方法]研究区采用铁栏围成封闭区域,用测钎法以1m×1m的距离布设测钎,对山地不同微地形、小生境的土壤侵蚀进行原位年监测,用箱图比较其土壤侵蚀深度差异,并作显著性分析。[结果]研究区不同微地形、不同小生境在土壤侵蚀程度上差异明显,微地形土壤侵蚀深度总体呈现为:凸形 > 平直形 > 凹形,微地形与土壤侵蚀呈显著相关。小生境土壤侵蚀平均深度表现为:石沟 > 石土面 > 石侧 > 土面 > 石缝,组间小生境与土壤侵蚀无明显相关,但石沟与土面呈现显著相关。[结论]岩溶区山地皆伐迹地应据微地形、小生境不同,实施差异化生态修复及防治工作,凸形微地形和石沟、石土面小生境是防治的关键。
[Objective] The differences of soil erosion between micro-topography
microhabitat in clear-cutting site of the karst region were studied in order to provide suggestions for ecological restoration and control in clear-cutting site of the karst region.[Methods] Soil erosion monitoring method of pin was employed to monitor annually soil erosion in situ (differentmicro-topography
microhabitat) at a distance of 1 m×1 m within a research area enclosed by iron bars
and box chart and significance test were utilized to compare the difference of soil erosion between them.[Results] It was found that significant difference in the degree of soil erosion of different micro-topography and microhabitats in the study area. More specifically
depth of soil erosion of micro-topography manifested an overall scale of convex > flat > concave
while depth of soil erosion of microhabitat demonstrated an overall scale of stone-drain > stone soil surface > the side of stone > soil surface > rock tunnels. There was a significant correlation between micro-topography and soil erosion
while no significant correlation existed between microhabitats and soil erosion in groups
but stone-drain and soil surface were respectively correlate to each other significantly.[Conclusion] Ecological restoration and control should be carried out according to different micro-topography and microhabitat in karst mountain clear cutting site
and the key of control lied in the convex micro-topography
the microhabitat of stone-drain and stone soil surface.
吴发启,张洪江.土壤侵蚀学[M].北京:科学出版社,2012.
Morgan R P C. Soil Erosion and Conservation[M]. Oxford, UK:Blackwell Science Ltd.,2005.
刘拓,周光辉,但新球,等.中国岩溶石漠化:现状、成因与防治[M].北京:中国林业出版社,2009.
王明章,况顺达,王伟,等.岩溶石漠化治理的地学模式研究[M].北京:地质出版社,2010.
满秀玲,刘吉春,李传荣,等.小兴安岭森林采伐对土壤侵蚀和河流泥沙量的影响[J].东北林业大学学报,1997,25(4):35-38.
赵秀海,范秀华,唐景义,等.论采伐对迹地的影响[J].吉林林学院学报,1993,9(4):1-8.
赵永泉,孙锡宏,李耀翔,等.森林采伐对迹地地表径流的影响[J].森林工程[J].2000,16(3):9-10.
石燕金,周运超.石漠化喀斯特皆伐迹地的土壤侵蚀特征[J].中国水土保持科学,2018,16(5):114-119.
张一澜,文安邦,严冬春.赤水河流域不同土地利用类型土壤侵蚀的
137
Cs法研究[J].地球与环境,2014,42(2):187-192.
段文军,李海防,王金叶,等.漓江上游典型森林植被对降水径流的调节作用[J].生态学报,2015,35(3):663-669.
周耀华.径流场监测结果在武汉黄陂区水土流失预测中的应用[J].水土保持研究,2013,20(6):10-13.
马述萍,张建军,孟霞.浅探测钎法在水土流失监测中的运用[J].内蒙古水利,2010(5):86-87.
毕华兴,张建军.适用于测钎法的土壤侵蚀最低模数阈值探讨[J].中国水土保持科学,2016(5):119-122.
熊康宁,李晋,龙明忠.典型喀斯特石漠化治理区水土流失特征与关键问题[J].地理学报,2012,67(7):878-888.
赵晓丽,张增祥,刘斌,等.基于遥感和GIS的全国土壤侵蚀动态监测方法研究[J].水土保持通报,2002,22(4):29-32.
李智广,杨胜天,高云飞,严慕绥,曾红娟.土壤侵蚀遥感监测方法及其思考[J].中国水土保持科学,2008,6(3):7-12.
李恩.浅议水土流失监测与调查方法[J].水土保持应用技术,2006(6):19-20.
席有.坡度影响土壤侵蚀的研究[J].中国水土保持,1993(4):19-21.
刘青泉,陈力,李家春.坡度对坡面土壤侵蚀的影响分析[J].应用数学和力学,2001,22(5):449-457.
Dai Nagamatsu, Osamu M. Soil disturbance regime in relation to micro-scale landforms and its effects on vegetation structure in a hilly area in Japan[J]. Plant Ecology, 1997,133(2):191-200.
武文波,姬翠翠,李晓松等.影响土壤水蚀的环境因子分析[J].中国水土保持,2010(5):36-38.
0
浏览量
957
下载量
5
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010802024621