1. 浙江工业大学 建筑工程学院,浙江,杭州,310023
2. 嘉兴市规划设计研究院,浙江,嘉兴,314000
纸质出版:2019
移动端阅览
陈前虎, 李玉莲, 黄初冬, 等. 城市建设用地海绵化程度对地表径流水质的影响——以浙江省嘉兴市为例[J]. 水土保持通报, 2019,39(4):1-8.
Chen Qianhu, Li Yulian, Huang Chudong, et al. Effects of Spongification Degree on Surface Runoff Water Quality in Urban Construction Land—A Case Study in Jiaxing City of Zhejiang Province[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2019, 39(4): 1-8.
陈前虎, 李玉莲, 黄初冬, 等. 城市建设用地海绵化程度对地表径流水质的影响——以浙江省嘉兴市为例[J]. 水土保持通报, 2019,39(4):1-8. DOI: 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2019.04.001.
Chen Qianhu, Li Yulian, Huang Chudong, et al. Effects of Spongification Degree on Surface Runoff Water Quality in Urban Construction Land—A Case Study in Jiaxing City of Zhejiang Province[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2019, 39(4): 1-8. DOI: 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2019.04.001.
[目的
]
探究海绵化程度与地表径流水质的关系,为缓解当前地表径流污染的海绵设施建设提供理论依据。[方法
]
以国家首批海绵城市试点嘉兴市为例,选取20个不同海绵化程度的项目为研究单元,建立可表征海绵设施类型、数量和布局等海绵化程度的指标,并采用冗余分析、偏最小二乘法、Origin拟合方程等方法进行分析。[结果
]
①样本中居住小区和公共建筑区域的水质均未满足地表水Ⅳ类及污水排放二级标准;已改造建设用地水质普遍优于未改造建设用地。②绿地和有效不透水下垫面(effective impervious area,EIA)比例是影响径流水质的关键因素,其中悬浮物(SS),生化需氧量(BOD
5
)和化学需氧量(COD)是主要受影响指标。③为使径流水质达到海绵城市建设要求,不同海绵化程度下的用地需要管控的指标阈值有差异。[结论
]
EIA≈0时,绿地比例应不低于31%;EIA=0.04(TIA)
1.7
时[其中TIA (total impervious area)为总不透水下垫面
]
绿地比例应不低于38.5%;EIA=TIA时,绿地比例应不低于47%;若维持现行的城市绿地比例(约为35%)建设标准,EIA比例应不超过9%。
[Objective] This paper aims at exploring the relationship between the spongification degree and the quality of surface runoff
so as to provide guidance for the construction of sponge facilities alleviating current surface runoff pollution.[Methods] Jiaxing City is one of the pilot sponge cities in China and was taken as a study area
where 20 projects with different spongification degrees were selected as analysis units. Indicators were established reflecting the spongification degree
such as the type
quantity and layout of sponge facilities. Redundancy analysis
partial least squares method and Origin fitting equation were introduced in the study.[Results] ① Neither the water quality of residential area nor of public buildings areas attained class Ⅳ of surface water and secondary standards for sewage discharge. The water quality of the sponging-transformed area was generally better than that of the untransformed area. ② The area ratio of green space to effective impervious area(EIA) is the key factor affecting runoff water quality
of which suspended solids(SS)
bichemical oxygen demand(BOD5) and chemical oxygen demand(COD) are the mainly affected indicators. ③ In order to make the runoff water quality meet the requirements of sponge city construction
thresholds for the control of land use under different spongification degree should be different.[Conclusion] When EIA≈0
the proportion of green space should be no less than 31%; when EIA=0.04(TIA)1.7 (TIA is the total impervious area)
the proportion of green space should be no less than 38.5%; when EIA=TIA
the proportion of green space should be no less than 47%. The ratio of EIA should not exceed 9% under the current urban green space ratio standard(about 35%).
Hamdi R, Termonia P, Baguis P. Effects of urbanization and climate change on surface runoff of the Brussels Capital Region:A case study using an urban soil-vegetation-atmosphere-transfer model[J]. International Journal of Climatology, 2011,31(13):1959-1974.
中华人民共和国住房和城乡建设部.海绵城市建设技术指南:低影响开发雨水系统构建(试行)[M].北京:中国建筑工业出版社,2014.
中华人民共和国住房和城乡建设部.海绵城市建设国家建筑标准设计体系[M].北京:中国建筑工业出版社,2016.
中华人民共和国住房和城乡建设部. GB50400-2016建筑与小区雨水控制及利用工程技术规范[S].北京:光明日报出版社,2016.
中华人民共和国住房和城乡建设部. GB51222-2017城镇内涝防治技术规范[S].北京:中国计划出版社,2017.
中华人民共和国住房和城乡建设部. GB51174-2017城镇雨水调蓄工程技术规范[S].北京:中国计划出版社,2017.
吕伟娅,管益龙,张金戈.绿色生态城区海绵城市建设规划设计思路探讨[J].中国园林,2015,31(6):16-20.
睢晋玲,刘淼,李春林,等.海绵城市规划及景观生态学启示:以盘锦市辽东湾新区为例[J].应用生态学报,2017,28(3):975-982.
陈小龙,赵冬泉,盛政,等.海绵城市规划系统的开发与应用[J].中国给水排水,2015,31(19):121-125.
李方正,胡楠,李雄,等.海绵城市建设背景下的城市绿地系统规划响应研究[J].城市发展研究,2016,23(7):39-45.
车伍,张鹍,张伟,等.初期雨水与径流总量控制的关系及其应用分析[J].中国给水排水,2016,32(6):9-14.
Zhang Qianqian,Han Yongtao,Geng Yudong, et al. Research advances on the effect of the runoff intercepting and pollution reducing of green roof[J]. Environmental Science & Technology, 2016,39(1):74-78.
Miller J D, Kim H, Kjeldsen T R, et al. Assessing the impact of urbanization on storm runoff in a peri-urban catchment using historical change in impervious cover[J]. Journal of Hydrology, 2014,515(7):59-70.
谢继锋,胡志新,徐挺,等.合肥市不同下垫面降雨径流水质特征分析[J].中国环境科学,2012,32(6):1018-1025.
伊元荣,海米提·依米提,赵丽丽.乌鲁木齐市不同下垫面雨水径流水质特性分析[J].水土保持研究,2010,17(2):247-251.
Pennino M J, Mcdonald R I, Jaffe P R. Watershed-scale impacts of stormwater green infrastructure on hydrology, nutrient fluxes, and combined sewer overflows in the mid-Atlantic region[J]. Science of The Total Environment, 2016,565(9):1044-1053.
Liu Wen, Chen Weiping, Peng Chi. Assessing the effectiveness of green infrastructures on urban flooding reduction:A community scale study[J]. Ecological Modelling,2014,291(1):6-14.
刘文,陈卫平,彭驰.社区尺度绿色基础设施暴雨径流消减模拟研究[J].生态学报,2016,36(6):1686-1697.
胡爱兵,任心欣,丁年,等.基于SWMM的深圳市某区域LID设施布局与优化[J].中国给水排水,2015,31(21):96-100.
胡爱兵,任心欣,裴古中.采用SWMM模拟LID市政道路的雨洪控制效果[J].中国给水排水,2015,31(23):130-133.
Allison H. Roy, Shuster W D. Assessing impervious surface connectivity and applications for watershed management[J]. Jawra Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 2010,45(1):198-209.
Nalinisahoo S, Sreeja P. Role of rainfall events and imperviousness parameters on urban runoff modelling[J]. Ish Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 2013,19(3):329-334.
Sohn W, Kim J H, Li M H. Low-impact development for impervious surface connectivity mitigation:assessment of directly connected impervious areas (DCIAs)[J]. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 2017,60(4):1-19.
Lee J G, Heaney J P. Estimation of urban imperviousness and its impacts on storm water systems[J]. Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management, 2003,129(5):419-426.
Alley W M, Veenhuis J E. Effective impervious area in urban runoff modeling[J]. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 1983,109(2):313-319.
Sutherland, Roger C. Methods for estimating the effective impervious area of urban watersheds[J]. Watershed Protection Techniques, 1995,2(1):282-284.
Maloney C J, Rastogi S C. Significance test for Grubbs's estimators[J]. Biometrics, 1970,26(4):671-676.
吴亚刚,陈莹,陈望,等.西安市某文教区典型下垫面径流污染特征[J].中国环境科学,2018,38(8):3104-3112.
赖江山.生态学多元数据排序分析软件Canoco5介绍[J].生物多样性,2013,21(6):765-768.
王惠文.偏最小二乘回归方法及其应用[M].北京:国防工业出版社,1999.
马壮,邸文静,王帅,等.基于Origin 7.0软件非线性拟合白浆土胡敏酸吸附Zn
2+
的热力学过程[J].中国农学通报,2014,30(32):159-164.
李琳琳,张依章,唐常源,等.基于偏最小二乘模型的河流水质对土地利用的响应[J].环境科学,2017,38(4):1376-1383.
0
浏览量
1720
下载量
1
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010802024621