基于生态服务价值的沱江流域土地景观生态风险时空分异研究

陈丹; 蒋贵国; 张妍; 涂月; 邓元杰

doi:10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2019.03.037

您当前的位置：

首页 >

文章列表页 >

基于生态服务价值的沱江流域土地景观生态风险时空分异研究

试验研究

- 基于生态服务价值的沱江流域土地景观生态风险时空分异研究
- Landscape Eco-risk Assessment and Its Spatio-temporal Variation of Tuojiang River Basin Based on Value of Ecological Services
- 水土保持通报 2019年39卷第3期页码：223-230
- 作者机构：
  
  1. 四川师范大学西南土地资源评价与监测教育部重点实验室,四川,成都,610068
  2. 四川师范大学地理与资源科学学院,四川,成都,610068
  3. 西北农林科技大学经济管理学院, 陕西杨凌,712100
- 作者简介：
- 基金信息：
- DOI：10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2019.03.037
  中图分类号： F205;K825.89
- 纸质出版：2019
- 稿件说明：
移动端阅览
陈丹, 蒋贵国, 张妍, 等. 基于生态服务价值的沱江流域土地景观生态风险时空分异研究[J]. 水土保持通报, 2019,39(3):223-230.

Chen Dan, Jiang Guiguo, Zhang Yan, et al. Landscape Eco-risk Assessment and Its Spatio-temporal Variation of Tuojiang River Basin Based on Value of Ecological Services[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2019, 39(3): 223-230.
陈丹, 蒋贵国, 张妍, 等. 基于生态服务价值的沱江流域土地景观生态风险时空分异研究[J]. 水土保持通报, 2019,39(3):223-230. DOI： 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2019.03.037.

Chen Dan, Jiang Guiguo, Zhang Yan, et al. Landscape Eco-risk Assessment and Its Spatio-temporal Variation of Tuojiang River Basin Based on Value of Ecological Services[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2019, 39(3): 223-230. DOI： 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2019.03.037.

摘要

[目的

]

探究沱江流域基于生态服务价值的生态风险时空分异的特征，为基于生态服务价值的沱江流域生态风险管控决策提供一定依据。[方法

]

借助ArcGIS，GeoDa，GS

和Conefor Sensinode等软件，以沱江流域为研究区，基于2000，2005，2010和2015年4期遥感土地利用数据，计算研究区生态服务价值，对生态风险计算方法进行改进，构建基于生态服务价值的生态风险评价指标体系，运用空间自相关分析和地统计分析方法，探讨位于快速城市化地区的沱江流域生态风险的时空分异规律。[结果

]

①沱江流域土地利用动态变化显著，用地类型以耕地转建设用地和林地转耕地为主。②沱江流域生态服务价值总量先增后降，耕地、林地对生态服务价值的贡献最大。③生态风险值总体呈上涨趋势，生态风险等级由以较低、中等生态风险为主向以中等生态风险为主转移，中等生态风险区域面积大幅增加。④研究区生态风险等级分布差异明显，高风险区和较高风险区主要分布在研究区北部，中等和较低风险区分布在研究区中部和南部，生态风险总体北大于南。[结论

]

土地利用变化会对生态服务价值产生重要影响，进而对沱江流域的生态风险产生影响。

Abstract

[Objective] The temporal and spatial variation of ecological risks in Tuojiang River Basin based on the value of ecological services was explored in order to provide a basis for ecological risk management and control in the area.[Methods] By using ArcGIS

GeoDa

GS+ and Conefor Sensinode software

taking Tuojiang River basin as the study area

based on the land use data derived from remote sensing images in 2000

2005

2010 and 2015

the ecological service value in the study area was calculated

then the calculation method of ecological risk was improved

and the evaluation index system of ecological risk based on ecological service value was constructed. The spatial autocorrelation analysis and statistical analysis methods were then used to investigate the spatio-temporal variation of ecological risk in Tuojiang River basin in the rapid urbanization areas.[Results] ① The dynamic change of land use in Tuojiang River basin was remarkable. The main land types were conversion of arable land to construction land and forestland to arable land. ② The total value of ecological services in Tuojiang River basin increased firstly and then decreased

and the contribution of farmland and forestland to the value of ecological services was the greatest. ③ The ecological risk value showed an increasing trend. The ecological risk level was shifted from low and medium ecological risk to medium ecological risk

and the area of medium ecological risk increased significantly. ④ The variation of the ecological risk level distribution in the study area was great. The high risk and relative high risk areas were mainly distributed in the north of the study area

while the medium and lower risk areas were mainly distributed in the middle and south of the study area. The overall ecological risk was greater in the north than in the south.[Conclusion] Land use change have an important impact on the value of ecological services

which in turn will have an impact on the ecological risk of the Tuojiang River basin.

关键词

Keywords

references

李国旗,安树青,陈兴龙,等.生态风险研究述评[J].生态学杂志,1999,18(4):57-64.

曹祺文,张曦文,马洪坤,等.景观生态风险研究进展及基于生态系统服务的评价框架:ESRISK[J].地理学报,2018,73(5):843-855.

许学工,林辉平,付在毅,等.黄河三角洲湿地区域生态风险评价[J].北京大学学报:自然科学版,2001,37(1):111-120.

谢花林.基于景观结构和空间统计学的区域生态风险分析[J].生态学报,2008,28(10):5020-5026.

高永年,高俊峰,许妍.太湖流域水生态功能区土地利用变化的景观生态风险效应[J].自然资源学报,2010,25(7):1088-1096.

胡和兵,刘红玉,郝敬锋,等.流域景观结构的城市化影响与生态风险评价[J].生态学报,2011,31(12):3432-3440.

石浩朋,于开芹,冯永军.基于景观结构的城乡结合部生态风险分析:以泰安市岱岳区为例[J].应用生态学报,2013,24(3):705-712.

张学斌,石培基,罗君,等.基于景观格局的干旱内陆河流域生态风险分析:以石羊河流域为例[J].自然资源学报,2014,29(3):410-419.

胡金龙,周志翔,滕明君,等.基于土地利用变化的典型喀斯特流域生态风险评估:以漓江流域为例[J].应用生态学报,2017,28(6):2003-2012.

谢刚,谢元贵,廖小锋,等.基于水土流失敏感性的岩溶地区景观生态风险评价:以黔南州为例[J].水土保持研究,2018,25(3):298-304.

盛书薇,董斌,李鑫,等.升金湖国家自然保护区土地利用生态风险评价[J].水土保持通报,2015,35(3):305-310.

刘永超,李加林,史小丽,等.1985-2015年美国Tampa Bay流域景观生态风险态势研判[J].水土保持通报,2016,36(3):125-130,135.

Schmidt P, Morrison T H. Watershed management in an urban setting:Process, scale and administration[J]. Land Use Policy, 2011,29(1):45-52.

Toth F L. Ecosystems and human well-being:A framework for assessment[J]. Physics Teacher, 2003,34(9):534-534.

四川统计局.四川统计年鉴[M].北京:中国统计出版社,2001-2016.

谢高地,鲁春霞,冷允法,等.青藏高原生态资产的价值评估[J].自然资源学报,2003,18(2):189-196.

谢高地,张彩霞,张雷明,等.基于单位面积价值当量因子的生态系统服务价值化方法改进[J].自然资源学报,2015,30(8):1243-1254.

Costanza R, d'Arge R, de Groot R, et al. The value of the world's ecosystem services and natural capital[J]. Ecological Economics, 1997,387:253-260.

李京,陈云浩,潘耀忠,等.生态资产定量遥感测量技术体系研究:生态资产定量遥感评估模型[J].遥感信息,2003,18(3):8-11.

胡金龙.漓江流域土地利用变化及生态效应研究[D].武汉:华中农业大学,2016.

任志远,张晗.银川盆地土地利用变化对景观格局脆弱性的影响[J].应用生态学报,2016,27(1):243-249.

时卉,杨兆萍,韩芳,等.新疆天池景区生态安全度时空分异特征与驱动机制[J].地理科学进展,2013,32(3):475-485.

Muller R A. On the geography of the Nazi Vote:Context, confession, and class in the reichstag election of 1930 by John O'Loughlin, Colin Flint, and Luc Anselin[J]. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 1995,85(2):351-380.

谢花林.基于景观结构的土地利用生态风险空间特征分析:以江西兴国县为例[J].中国环境科学,2011,31(4):688-695.

郑江坤,余新晓,贾国栋,等.密云水库集水区基于LUCC的生态服务价值动态演变[J]. 农业工程学报, 2010,26(9):315-320.

浏览量

1120

下载量

CSCD

文章被引用时，请邮件提醒。

提交

工具集

关联资源

浙江省生态安全格局时空演变特征及其影响因素

沱江流域土地利用碳平衡与人类活动强度的关系

城乡融合背景下秦巴山区县域“三生”空间时空演变

不同空间尺度耕地埂坎提取方法及其分布特征

不同改良剂对滨海盐渍土盐分离子及玉米生长的影响