1. 青海大学 地质工程系,青海,西宁,810016
2. 中国科学院 青海盐湖研究所,青海,西宁,810008
纸质出版:2019
移动端阅览
周林虎, 胡夏嵩, 刘昌义, 等. 青藏高原东北部4种灌木主根和侧根抗拉力学特性比较[J]. 水土保持通报, 2019,39(3):93-100.
Zhou Linhu, Hu Xiasong, Liu Changyi, et al. Comparison of Tensile Resistance Properties of Main Roots and Lateral Roots Among Four Shrub Species in Northeast Qinghai-Tibet Plateau[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2019, 39(3): 93-100.
周林虎, 胡夏嵩, 刘昌义, 等. 青藏高原东北部4种灌木主根和侧根抗拉力学特性比较[J]. 水土保持通报, 2019,39(3):93-100. DOI: 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2019.03.016.
Zhou Linhu, Hu Xiasong, Liu Changyi, et al. Comparison of Tensile Resistance Properties of Main Roots and Lateral Roots Among Four Shrub Species in Northeast Qinghai-Tibet Plateau[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2019, 39(3): 93-100. DOI: 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2019.03.016.
[目的]开展青藏高原东北部黄土区4种灌木植物主根和侧根抗拉力学强度试验,探讨主根和侧根抗拉力学特性关系,为深入研究植物根系固土护坡力学机理提供参考。[方法]选取西宁盆地长岭沟流域作为研究区,对生长期为3 a的柠条锦鸡儿(Caragana korshinskii)、中宁枸杞(Lycium chinense)、白刺(Nitraria tangutorum)和霸王(Sarcozygium xanthoxylon)4种优势灌木主根和侧根进行室内单根拉伸试验,确定其主根和侧根抗拉力、抗拉强度和杨氏模量及其与根径之间的关系;在此基础上,进一步分析了4种灌木主根和侧根根径、抗拉力、抗拉强度和杨氏模量之间的关系。[结果]柠条锦鸡儿、中宁枸杞、白刺和霸王主根抗拉力分别为侧根的28.45,13.21,11.01,7.35倍,主根抗拉强度分别为侧根的0.67,1.17,0.68,1.22倍,主根杨氏模量分别为侧根的2.00,2.39,2.82,2.48倍。[结论]4种灌木植物主根抗拉力均显著大于侧根;柠条锦鸡儿和白刺主根抗拉强度小于侧根,而中宁枸杞和霸王主根抗拉强度大于侧根;4种灌木植物主根杨氏模量显著大于侧根,说明其主根相对于侧根不易发生形变,对边坡浅层稳定性贡献亦显著于侧根。
[Objective] The tensile strength tests were carried out of the main roots and lateral roots of four shrub species in the loess area of Northeast Qinghai-Tibet Plateau
and the relationship between mechanical properties of main roots and lateral roots was discussed
which provided a reference for investigating the mechanical mechanism of plant roots in stabilizing soils and slopes.[Methods] The drainage area of Changlinggou in Xining Basin was selected as the studying area
and the tensile force
tensile strength
Young's modulus were measured by laboratory single root tensile test of four three-year-old shrub species(Caragana korshinskii
Lycium chinense
Nitraria tangutorum and Sarcozygium xanthoxylon).Then the relationship between root diameter
tensile force
tensile strength and Young's modulus of main roots and lateral roots of four species was further analyzed.[Results] The tensile forces of main roots of C. korshinskii
L. chinense
N. tangutorum and S. xanthoxylon were 28.45
13.21
11.01 and 7.35 times of lateral roots
the tensile strengths of main roots were 0.67
1.17
0.68 and 1.22 times of lateral roots
and the Young's moduluses of main roots were 2.00
2.39
2.82 and 2.48 times of lateral roots
respectively.[Conclusion] The tensile forces of main roots were significantly higher than lateral roots for four shrub species. The tensile strengths of main roots of C. korshinskii and N. tangutorum were lower than lateral roots
while the tensile strengths of main roots of L. chinense and S. xanthoxylon were higher than lateral roots. The Young's moduluses of main roots were significantly higher than lateral roots for four species
it showed that the main roots were not easy to deform in comparison with the lateral roots
and the contribution of main roots to the stability of the shallow slope is significantly higher than lateral roots.
Gary D H, Andrew T L. Biotechnical slope protection and erosion control[M]. New York:Van Nostrand Reinhold Company, 1982.
付江涛,李光莹,虎啸天,等.植物固土护坡效应的研究现状及发展趋势[J].工程地质学报,2014,22(6):1135-1146.
Simon A, Collison A J C. Quantifying the mechanical and hydrologic effects of riparian vegetation on stream-bank stability[J]. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms, 2002,27(5):527-546.
余芹芹,乔娜,胡夏嵩,等.植物根-土复合体固坡力学效应及模型研究现状与进展[J].中国水土保持,2011(7):51-54,69.
夏旖琪.草类根系根土复合体的强度和渗透特性及对边坡稳定性的影响[D].长沙:长沙理工大学,2017.
Danjon F, Fourcaud T, Bert D. Root architecture and wind-firmness of mature
Pinus pinaster
. New Phytologist, 2005,168(2):387-400.
Coppin N J, Richards I G. Use of Vegetation in Civil Engineering[M]. London:Butterworths, 1990.
雷相科,张雪彪,杨启红,等.植物根系抗拉力学性能研究进展[J].浙江农林大学学报,2016,33(4):703-711.
刘亚斌,李淑霞,余冬梅,等.西宁盆地黄土区典型草本植物单根抗拉力学特性试验[J].农业工程学报,2018,34(15):157-166.
左志严,格日乐,乌仁图雅,等.内蒙古中西部3种乡土植物根系抗拉力学特性的对比研究[J].水土保持通报,2015,35(2):52-57,63.
欧阳前超,魏杨,周霞,等.土石山区护坡草本植物根系抗拉力学特性[J].中国水土保持科学, 2017,15(4):35-41.
田佳,曹兵,及金楠,等.防风固沙灌木花棒沙柳根系生物力学特性[J]. 农业工程学报,2014,30(23):192-198.
Capilleri P P, Motta E, Raciti E. Experimental study on native plant root tensile strength for slope stabilization[J]. Procedia Engineering, 2016,158(4):116-121.
Abdi E, Majnounian B, Rahimi H, et al. Distribution and tensile strength of Hornbeam (
Carpinus betulus
) roots growing on slopes of Caspian Forests, Iran[J]. Journal of Forestry Research, 2009,20(2):105-110.
罗春燕,吴楚,芦光新,等.三江源区植物根-土复合体的抗拉拔力特征及影响因素分析[J].水土保持研究,2014,21(5):260-271.
孙凤环,梅淑敏,胡泉宗.青藏高原生态地质环境调查与探究[J].中国西部科技,2015,14(8):92-96.
曾业隆,周全,江栗,等.基于遥感与GIS的青藏高原典型电网工程生态环境敏感性分析[J].中国环境科学,2017,37(8):3096-3106.
孙恺.西宁盆地地下热水循环机制与资源评价[D].西安:西北大学,2015.
杨芳,刘露.青海东部干旱发生规律及其变化趋势[J].干旱区研究,2012,29(2):284-288.
朱海丽,胡夏嵩,毛小青,等.青藏高原黄土区护坡灌木植物根系力学特性研究[J].岩石力学与工程学报,2008,27(S2):3445-3452.
胡志勇.以西宁市长岭沟小流域为例浅析城郊型水土保持[J].青海水利,2002(2):33-35.
李小玲.浅析西宁市生态环境质量评价[J].青海环境,2004,14(3):128-130.
王占林.青海高原高山灌木林植被特点及主要类型[J].防护林科技,2014(12):34-37.
程杰,刘永辉,田瑛.宁夏半干旱区柠条锦鸡儿灌木林生长特征[J].水土保持通报,2016,36(1):332-336.
钱学射,张卫明,金久宁,等.枸杞的健康保健功用和合理开发利用[J].中国野生植物资源,2014,33(3):62-69.
王宁.白刺资源及开发前景[J].陕西林业科技,2000(1):17-18.
张琳琳.长期大风对霸王根系分布的影响[D].乌鲁木齐:新疆师范大学,2014.
张云伟,惠尚,卜晓磊,等.3种散生竹的单根抗拉力学特性[J].林业科学,2013,49(7):183-187.
Boldrin D, Leung A K, Bengough A G. Effects of root dehydration on biomechanical properties of woody roots of
Ulex europaeus
. Plant and Soil, 2018,431(1/2):347-369.
李贺鹏,岳春雷,赵广琦,等.中亚热带常绿阔叶林中主要灌木根系力学特性[J].西北林学院学报,2010,25(5):33-36.
Yang Yuanjun, Chen Lihua, Li Ning. Effect of root moisture content and diameter on root tensile properties[J]. PLoS ONE, 2016,11(3):1-17.
蒋坤云.植物根系抗拉特性的单根微观结构作用机制[D].北京:北京林业大学,2013.
及金楠,吴智阳,姚安坤.林木根系单根的生物力学特性[J].福建农林大学学报:自然科学版,2012,41(2):140-144.
0
浏览量
1052
下载量
3
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010802024621