1. 内蒙古农业大学 沙漠治理学院,内蒙古,呼和浩特,010019
2. 北京林业大学 水土保持学院,北京,10083
纸质出版:2019
移动端阅览
格日乐, 郝需婷, 苏日娜, 等. 4种不同植被群落类型表土的抗蚀力学特性[J]. 水土保持通报, 2019,39(3):1-6.
Ge Rile, Hao Xuting, Su Rina, et al. Mechanical Properties of Topsoil Anti-erodibility Under Four Different Vegetation Community Types[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2019, 39(3): 1-6.
格日乐, 郝需婷, 苏日娜, 等. 4种不同植被群落类型表土的抗蚀力学特性[J]. 水土保持通报, 2019,39(3):1-6. DOI: 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2019.03.001.
Ge Rile, Hao Xuting, Su Rina, et al. Mechanical Properties of Topsoil Anti-erodibility Under Four Different Vegetation Community Types[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2019, 39(3): 1-6. DOI: 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2019.03.001.
[目的]研究黄土高原农林业生产表层土壤水土流失,为该区域及其相似地区生态修复中树种选择及配置提供科学依据。[方法]以杨树+柠条乔灌混交林、杨树纯林、油松常绿针叶林和柠条灌木纯林下4种不同植被群落类型下表土为对象,进行抗剪力学特性研究,并分析土壤含水率对其力学特性的影响力。[结果]在测试表土含水率2.5%~12.5%范围内,4种不同植被类型及裸地对照样地土壤结皮抗剪强度和黏聚力均随着土壤含水率的增加呈增大的趋势,表明在一定范围内表土湿润程度的增加对提高土壤表层抗蚀能力起到积极作用;4种不同植被群落类型表土抗剪强度和黏聚力的值均显著大于裸地的值,说明水土保持的林草措施对表层土壤结构的改善起到了促进作用,从而提高了表层土壤的抗侵蚀能力;在测试含水率2.5%~12.5%范围内随着含水率的增加各样地表土内摩擦角无明显的变化规律。[结论]4种不同植被群落类型中柠条+杨树混交林下表土抗剪强度、黏聚力总体表现最大,这也从另外一方面说明了水土保持的林草措施中营造混交林的优越性。
[Objective] The soil erosion of topsoil in agricultural forestry production in Loess Plateau was researched in order to provide scientific basis for the selection and allocation of tree species in ecological restoration in this area and its similar areas.[Methods] The shear mechanical properties of topsoil under four different vegetation community types including poplar + Caragana korshinskii mixed forest
poplar pure forest
Pinus tabulaeformis evergreen coniferous forest and C. korshinskii shrub pure forest were studied
and the influence of soil moisture content on its mechanical properties was analyzed.[Results] In the range of 2.5%~12.5% of the water content of the test topsoil
the shear strength and adhesion of the surface soil were increased with the increase of soil moisture content in 4 different vegetation types and bare ground
indicating that the increase of soil moisture played a positive role in improving the anti-erodibility of soil surface in a certain range. The shear strength and adhesion values of topsoil under 4 different vegetation community types were significantly larger than those of bare land
which indicated that the soil and water conservation measures had improved surface soil structure
thus improving the anti-erodibility of the surface soil. There was no significant change in friction angle of surface soil with the increase of water content in the range of 2.5%~12.5%.[Conclusion] The shear strength and cohesion of the topsoil under the mixed forest of lime + poplar were the greatest among the four different vegetation community types
which also explained the superiority of mixed forest in forest and grass measures of soil and water conservation.
卜崇峰.表土结皮的发育机理及其侵蚀效应研究[D].北京:中国科学院,2006.
李朝霞,王天巍,史志华,等.降雨过程中红壤表土结构变化与侵蚀产沙关系[J].水土保持研究,2005,19(1):11-14.
Onofiok O, Singer M J. Scanning electron microscope studies of surface crusts formed by simulated rainfall[J]. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 1984,48(5):1137-1143.
Bradford J M. Interrill soil erosion processes:Effect of surface sealing on infiltration, runoff and soil splash de-tachmen[J]. Soil Science Society of America Journal,1987,51(6):1566-1577.
Levy G J, Levin J, Shainberg I. Seal formation and interrill soil erosion[J]. Soil Science Society of America Journal 1994,58(1):352-356.
王辉,王全九,邵明安,等.表土结皮影响坡地产流产沙及养分流失的试验研究[J].水土保持学报,2008,22(4):35-38.
Ekwue E I. Effect of peat content, rainfall durtion and aggregate size on soil crust strent, rainfall duration and aggregate size on soil crust strength[J].Earth Surface Processes and Landforms, 1991,16(6):431-436.
Gal M, Arcon L, Shainberg I. Effect of exchangeable sodium and phosphogypsum on crust structure scanning electron microscope observations[J]. Soil Science, 1984,48:872-878.
Morin J, Van Winkel J. The effect of eaindrop impact and sheet erosion on infiltration rate and crust formation[J]. Soil Science, 1996,60(4):1223-1227.
唐泽军,雷廷武,张晴雯,等.降雨及聚丙烯酰胺(PAM)作用下土壤的封闭过程和结皮的形成[J].生态学报,2002,22(5):674-681.
胡霞,蔡强国,刘连友,等.人工降雨条件下几种土壤结皮发育特征[J].土壤学报,2005,42(3):504-507.
程琴娟,蔡强国,李家永.表土结皮发育过程及其侵蚀响应研究进展[J].地理科学进展,2005,24(4):114-122.
Hussain S M, Smillie G W, Couins J F. Laboratory studies of crust development in Irish an Iragi[J].Soil and Tillage Research, 1985,5:33-35.
Remley P A, Bradford J M. Relationship of soil crust morphology to inter-rill erosion parameters[J]. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 1989,53(4):1215-1221.
Eldridge D J, Bradstock R A. The effect of time since fire on the cover and composition of cryptogamic soil crusts on a
Eucalypus
shrubland soil[J]. Cunninghamia, 1994,3:581-599.
唐泽军,左海萍,于键,等.ESP值和黏粒含量对土壤表面封闭作用的影响[J].农业工程学报,2007,23(5):51-55.
程琴娟,蔡强国,马文军.我国水土流失典型区土壤表土结皮敏感性[J].地理研究,2008,27(6):1290-1298.
范云涛,雷廷武,蔡强国.湿润速度和累积降雨对土壤表面结皮发育的影响[J].土壤学报,2009,46(5):764-771.
卜崇峰,石长春,蔡强国.土壤结皮几种分析测算指标的应用评价[J].水土保持学报,2009,23(2):240-243.
程琴娟,蔡强国.模拟降雨下黄土表土结皮的侵蚀响应[J].水土保持学报,2013,27(4):73-77.
程琴娟,蔡强国,郑明国.黄土土壤结皮对产流临界雨强的影响分析[J].地理科学,2007,27(5):678-682.
陈正发,夏清,史东梅,等.基于模拟降雨的土壤表土结皮特征及坡面侵蚀响应[J].水土保持学报,2011,25(4):6-11.
吴秋菊,吴发启,王林华.土壤结皮坡面流水动力学特征[J].农业工程学报,2014,30(1):73-80.
李晓丽,申向东.结皮土壤的抗风蚀性分析[J].干旱区资源与环境,2006,20(2):203-207.
余新晓,陈丽华.黄土高原沟壑区土壤抗蚀性的初步研究[J].北京林业大学学报,1988,10(1):28-34.
格日乐,张成福,蒙仲举,等.3种植物根-土复合体抗剪特性对比分析[J].水土保持学报,2014,28(2):85-90.
南京水利科学研究院土工研究所.土工试验技术手册[M].北京:人民交通出版社,2003.
格日乐,刘艳琦,左志严,等.土壤水分对植物根-土界面相互作用特性的影响[J].水土保持学报,2018,32(1):135-140.
张欣,姚喜军,刘静,等.土壤孔隙水承压条件下4种根-土复合体抗剪特性[J].水土保持通报,2010,30(4):22-26.
格日乐, 左志严, 蒙仲举, 等. 杨柴根系提高土体抗剪特性的研究[J].水土保持学报,2014,28(4):72-77.
解明曙.林木根系固坡力学机制研究[J].水土保持学报,1990,4(3):7-14.
Waldrom L J, Dakessian S. Soil reinforcemet by rootsr:Calculation of increased soil shears resistance from root propenies[J]. Soil Science, 1981,132(6):427-435.
陈昌富,刘怀星,李亚军.草根加筋土的护坡机理及强度准则试验研究[J].中南公路工程,2006(2):14-17.
刘秀萍,陈丽华,宋维峰.林木根系与黄土复合体的抗剪强度试验研究[J].北京林业大学学报,2006,17(5):67-72.
0
浏览量
1038
下载量
2
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010802024621