云南大学亚洲国际河流中心/云南省国际河流与跨境生态安全重点实验室,云南,昆明,650091
纸质出版:2019
移动端阅览
范雪梅, 罗贤, 季漩, 等. 基于MOD16产品的怒江流域中上游蒸散发分布特征研究[J]. 水土保持通报, 2019,39(2):199-205.
Fan Xuemei, Luo Xian, Ji Xuan, et al. Spatial Distribution of Evapotranspiration in Middle and Upper Nujiang River Basin Based on MOD16 Products[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2019, 39(2): 199-205.
范雪梅, 罗贤, 季漩, 等. 基于MOD16产品的怒江流域中上游蒸散发分布特征研究[J]. 水土保持通报, 2019,39(2):199-205. DOI: 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2019.02.032.
Fan Xuemei, Luo Xian, Ji Xuan, et al. Spatial Distribution of Evapotranspiration in Middle and Upper Nujiang River Basin Based on MOD16 Products[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2019, 39(2): 199-205. DOI: 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2019.02.032.
[目的]研究怒江流域中上游蒸散发的空间分布特征,为流域水资源合理开发及生态保护提供支撑。[方法]利用气象站点实测降水资料,验证TRMM(tropical rainfall measuring mission)3B43产品在怒江流域中上游的精度,进而对MODIS(moderate-resolution imagine spectroradiometer)全球陆地蒸散发产品(MOD16)在该流域的适用性进行检验。在此基础上,探讨该流域蒸散发及产水量的空间分布特征。[结果]①TRMM3B43数据与站点实测月降水量相关系数R为0.86,在怒江流域中上游使用具有较好精度,MOD16蒸散发量相对偏大,但仍具有一定的适用性;②研究区多年平均蒸散发量为489.4 mm,蒸散发主要集中在300~800 mm;③降水量与蒸散发量的差值(P-E)与降水量(P)的空间分布格局相似,(P-E)/P在无植被地区较大(为0.33),在植被覆盖区相对较小。[结论]研究区多年平均蒸散发量空间分布差异较大,沿河流呈现出低-高-低-高的变化规律;MOD16产品具有覆盖范围广,时空上连续等特点,能够为缺资料地区蒸散发的相关研究提供相对可靠的数据支撑。
[Objective] The spatial distribution characteristics were studied in order for rational utilization of water resources utilization and ecological protection in the middle and upper Nujiang River Basin.[Methods] Making use of observations from meteorological stations
the performance of TRMM(tropical rainfall measuring mission) 3B43 product in the middle and upper Nujiang River Basin was verified
and then the applicability of MOD16(moderate-resolution imagine spectroradiometer) products were further examined. The spatial distribution characteristics of evapotranspiration and water yield were analyzed.[Results] ① At monthly scale
the correlation coefficient between TRMM 3B43 estimates and rain gauge observations was 0.86
indicating TRMM 3B43 data had good accuracy in the middle and upper Nujiang River Basin. The evapotranspiration obtained from MOD16 data was higher
but still had applicability. ② The mean annual evapotranspiration in the study area mainly ranged from 300 to 800 mm
and the regional mean value was 489.4 mm. ③ The spatial distribution of (P-E) was similar to that of P
while (P-E)/P(0.33) in barren areas and smaller in vegetation-covered areas.[Conclusion] The spatial distribution of evapotranspiration was heterogeneous
showing a low-high-low-high variation along the river. With widespread coverage and continuous observation
MOD16 products could provide reliable support for evapotranspiration research in lack-data watershed.
Jung M, Reichstein M, Ciais P, et al. Recent decline in the global land evapotranspiration trend due to limited moisture supply[J]. Nature, 2010,467(7318):951-954.
Allen R G, Pereira L S, Howell T A, et al. Evapotranspiration information reporting(I):Factors governing measurement accuracy[J]. Agricultural Water Management, 2011,98(6):899-920.
Li Zhaoliang, Tang Ronglin, Wan Zhengming, et al. A review of current methodologies for regional evapotranspiration estimation from remotely sensed data[J]. Sensors, 2009,9(5):3801-3853.
Chen Yang, Xia Jiangzhou, Liang Shunlin, et al. Comparison of satellite-based evapotranspiration models over terrestrial ecosystems in China[J]. Remote Sensing of Environment, 2014,140(140):279-293.
冯松,汤懋苍,王冬梅.青藏高原是我国气候变化启动区的新证据[J].科学通报,1998,43(6):633-636.
梁小文,杨梅学,万国宁,等.青藏高原气温序列的均一性研究[J].冰川冻土,2015,37(2):275-285.
郑然,李栋梁,蒋元春.全球变暖背景下青藏高原气温变化的新特征[J].高原气象,2015,34(6):1531-1539.
Liu Xiaomang, Zheng Hongxing, Zhang Minghua, et al. Identification of dominant climate factor for pan evaporation trend in the Tibetan Plateau[J]. Journal of geographical sciences, 2011,21(4):594-608.
中国科学院青藏高原综合科学考察队.西藏河流与湖泊[M].北京:科学出版社,1984.
罗贤,何大明,季漩,等.近50年怒江流域中上游枯季径流变化及其对气候变化的响应[J].地理科学,2016,36(1):107-113.
杜军,翁海卿,袁雷,等.近40年西藏怒江河谷盆地的气候特征及变化趋势[J].地理学报,2009,64(5):581-591.
周刊社,杜军,袁雷,等.西藏怒江流域高寒草甸气候生产潜力对气候变化的响应[J].草业学报,2010,64(5):17-24.
刘冬英,沈燕舟,王政祥.怒江流域水资源特性分析[J].人民长江,2008,39(17):64-66.
Huffman G J, Adler R F, Bolvin D T, et al. The TRMM multisatellite precipitation analysis(TMPA):Quasi-global,multiyear,combined-sensor precipitation estimates at fine scales[J]. Journal of Hydrometeorology, 2007,8(1):38-55.
谢红霞,刘旭星,隋兵,等. TRMM降雨数据在湖南省长株潭地区的适用性[J].水土保持通报.2017,37(3):295-301.
齐文文,张百平,庞宇,等.基于TRMM数据的青藏高原降水的空间和季节分布特征[J].地理科学,2013,33(8):999-1005.
程珂,朱祯,李铭,等. TRMM3B43降水产品在西藏地区的精度检验和应用[J].水利水电技术,2014,45(1):44-46.
Mu Qiaozhen, Heinsch F A, Zhao Maosheng, et al. Development of a global evapotranspiration algorithm based on MODIS and global meteorology data[J]. Remote sensing of Environment, 2007,111(4):519-536.
Mu Qiaozhen, Zhao Maosheng, Running S W. Improvements to a MODIS global terrestrial evapotranspiration algorithm[J]. Remote Sensing of Environment, 2011,115(8):1781-1800.
吴桂平,刘元波,赵晓松,等.基于MOD16产品的鄱阳湖流域地表蒸散量时空分布特征[J].地理研究,2013,32(4):617-627.
贺添,邵全琴.基于MOD16产品的我国2001-2010年蒸散发时空格局变化分析[J].地球信息科学学报,2014,16(6):979-988.
赫晓慧,梁冰洁,郭恒亮,等.基于MOD16的北洛河流域蒸散发空间格局演变研究[J].水土保持通报,2017,37(1):177-182.
宋璐璐.青藏高原蒸散发时空变化特征研究[D].北京:中国科学院地理科学与资源研究所,2013.
杨大文,杨汉波,雷慧闽.流域水文学[M].北京:清华大学出版社,2014.
刘国纬.西藏高原的水文特征[J].水利学报,1992(5):1-8.
杜军,房世波,唐小萍,等.1981-2010年西藏怒江流域潜在蒸发量的时空变化[J].气候变化研究进展,2012,8(1):35-42.
0
浏览量
1120
下载量
6
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010802024621