1. 西藏大学 工学院,西藏,拉萨,850000
2. 湖南大学 土木工程学院,湖南,长沙,410082
纸质出版:2019
移动端阅览
刘宁波, 田荣燕, 王海波, 等. 基于AHP-模糊综合评价方法的拉萨市周边溜砂坡稳定性评价[J]. 水土保持通报, 2019,39(2):161-166.
Liu Ningbo, Tian Rongyan, Wang Haibo, et al. Stability Evaluation of Sand-sliding Slope Around Lhasa City Based on AHP-Fuzzy Comprehensive Evaluation Method[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2019, 39(2): 161-166.
刘宁波, 田荣燕, 王海波, 等. 基于AHP-模糊综合评价方法的拉萨市周边溜砂坡稳定性评价[J]. 水土保持通报, 2019,39(2):161-166. DOI: 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2019.02.026.
Liu Ningbo, Tian Rongyan, Wang Haibo, et al. Stability Evaluation of Sand-sliding Slope Around Lhasa City Based on AHP-Fuzzy Comprehensive Evaluation Method[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2019, 39(2): 161-166. DOI: 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2019.02.026.
[目的]溜砂坡作为一种边坡灾害,近几年来,由于人类活动影响,其威胁程度不断提高。通过研究拉萨市周边溜砂坡的稳定性,为溜砂坡的预警及治理提供依据。[方法]通过选取拉萨市周边较为典型的溜砂坡灾害,使用层次分析法和模糊综合评价法分析坡高、岩体结构和年平均降雨量等10个因素对溜砂坡稳定性的影响。[结果]因风化占主导因素的岩体所形成的溜砂坡的危险等级相对较高,其整体呈散沙状,极易扩散,道路沿线山体易发生滑坡处所形成的溜砂坡危险等级普遍较低,碎屑颗粒较大且坡势较陡。[结论]目前拉萨市周边地区溜砂坡存在不稳定的发展趋势,需引起相关部门的高度重视;本评价方法真实可靠,能够准确快速地评价溜砂坡的稳定性。
[Objective] As a kind of slope disaster
the threat degree of sand-sliding slope has been increasing in recent years due to the influence of human activities. The stability of the sand-sliding slope around Lhasa City was studied in order to provide bases for the early warning and treatment of the sand-sliding slope.[Methods] By selecting the relatively typical sand-sliding disaster around Lhasa City
the paper analyzed the influence of ten factors
such as slope height
rock mass structure and annual average rainfall
on the stability of the sand-sliding slope by using analytic hierarchy process and fuzzy comprehensive evaluation.[Results] The sand-sliding slope formed by weathering-dominated rock mass was relatively high in risk level
and the whole was scattered and sandy
which was easy to spread. The sand-sliding slope formed by landslides along the road was generally low in risk level
with large debris particles and steep slope potential.[Conclusion] At present
the development trend of the unstable sand-sliding slope disaster in the area around Lhasa City is not optimistic
which should be paid more attention for relevant administrative agencies. The evaluation method in this paper is reliable
which can accurately and rapidly evaluate the stability of sand-sliding slope.
来志强,周伟,杨利福,等.基于离散单元法的溜砂坡堆积形态数值研究[J].中南大学学报:自然科学版,2017,48(7):157-166.
张小刚,杨天军,陈伟.藏东南溜砂坡的发育特征与防治[J].灾害学,2014,29(1):47-51.
罗德富,毛济周,朱平一,等.川藏公路南线(西藏境内)山地灾害及防治对策[M].北京:科学出版社,1995.
蒋良潍,姚令侃,蒋忠信,等.溜砂坡动力学特性试验及防治[J].山地学报,2004,22(1):97-103.
阙云,王磊,张志勇,等.溜砂颗粒运动模型探讨[J].水土保持通报, 2006, 26(3):59-62.
叶唐进,谢强,王鹰.国道G318玉普-然乌段溜砂坡形成中流水作用的讨论[J].公路, 2016(7):63-67.
张俊巍,田荣燕,薛现凯,等.西藏拉萨地区冻融作用对溜砂坡天然休止角的影响[J].中国地质灾害与防治学报,2017,28(3):52-57.
莫宣学,赵志丹,邓晋福,等.印度-亚洲大陆主碰撞过程的火山作用响应[J].地学前缘,2003(3):135-148.
王艳,石荣媛,乔长录.基于模糊综合评价模型的天山北坡经济带水资源承载力评价[J].水土保持通报,2018,38(5):206-212,219.
洪海春.关(岭)海兴(义)高等级公路工程边坡稳定性分析与危险性预测[D].贵州贵阳:贵州工业大学,2004.
洪海春,徐卫亚,叶明亮.基于模糊综合评判的边坡稳定性分析[J].河海大学学报,2005,33(5):558-559.
张勇慧,李红旭,盛谦,等.基于模糊综合评判的公路岩质边坡稳定性分级研究[J].岩土力学,2010,31(10):3151-3156.
李来仕,王清,孔元元,等.基于层次分析法的灰坝桥沟泥石流危险性评价[J].路基工程,2017(1):184-188.
杨柯,张军.层次分析法在溜砂坡危险性评价中的应用[J].长春工程学院学报:自然科学版,2012,13(4):82-85.
付君宜,杨光玉.基于模糊综合评判的边坡稳定性评价[J].建材与装饰,2017(16):212-213.
孙洪,付君宜,吴斌,等.岩堆稳定性模糊综合评价方法在FAST工程中的应用[J].科学技术与工程,2017,17(4):281-286.
0
浏览量
971
下载量
1
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010802024621