基于CSLE模型的天山北坡西白杨沟流域土壤侵蚀定量评价

卢刚

doi:10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2019.02.020

您当前的位置：

首页 >

文章列表页 >

基于CSLE模型的天山北坡西白杨沟流域土壤侵蚀定量评价

试验研究

- 基于CSLE模型的天山北坡西白杨沟流域土壤侵蚀定量评价
- Quantitative Assessment of Soil Erosion in West Baiyanggou Watershed on North Slopes of Tianshan Mountains Based on CSLE Model
- 水土保持通报 2019年39卷第2期页码：124-130
- 作者机构：
  
  新疆维吾尔自治区水土保持与生态环境监测总站,新疆,乌鲁木齐,830000
- 作者简介：
- 基金信息：
  
  新疆维吾尔自治区财政专项“天山北坡典型区水土流失与经济发展关系研究”
- DOI：10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2019.02.020
  中图分类号： S157
- 纸质出版：2019
- 稿件说明：
移动端阅览
卢刚. 基于CSLE模型的天山北坡西白杨沟流域土壤侵蚀定量评价[J]. 水土保持通报, 2019,39(2):124-130.

Lu Gang. Quantitative Assessment of Soil Erosion in West Baiyanggou Watershed on North Slopes of Tianshan Mountains Based on CSLE Model[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2019, 39(2): 124-130.
卢刚. 基于CSLE模型的天山北坡西白杨沟流域土壤侵蚀定量评价[J]. 水土保持通报, 2019,39(2):124-130. DOI： 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2019.02.020.

Lu Gang. Quantitative Assessment of Soil Erosion in West Baiyanggou Watershed on North Slopes of Tianshan Mountains Based on CSLE Model[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2019, 39(2): 124-130. DOI： 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2019.02.020.

摘要

[目的

]

定量评价天山北坡西白杨沟流域水土流失土壤侵蚀状况，分析其分布特征，为区域水土保持以及生态环境建设提供科学依据。[方法

]

以新疆维吾尔自治区乌鲁木齐县西白杨沟流域为研究区，采用样地调查与地理信息系统（GIS）、遥感（RS）技术相结合方法和CSLE模型，对西白杨沟流域进行土壤水力侵蚀评价及侵蚀强度空间分布分析。[结果

]

天山北坡西白杨沟流域平均土壤侵蚀模数748.91 t/（km

·a）。地形对土壤侵蚀强度影响明显，在坡度20°~40°区域，土壤侵蚀模数最高，为1 127.22~1 229.62 t/（km

·a）。缓坡（

20°）区域，坡度对土壤侵蚀模数呈正效应，而在陡坡（40°~70°）区域，坡度对土壤侵蚀模数呈负效应。土壤侵蚀主要发生在南坡、东南坡和东坡；不同土地利用方式对土壤水力侵蚀程度影响不同，表现为：呈灌木林地[1 709.80 t/（km

·a）

]

> 有林地[1 389.40 t/（km

·a）

]

> 天然牧草地[605.20 t/（km

·a）

]

> 人工牧草地[334.71 t/（km

·a）

]

> 水浇地[113.69 t/（km

·a）

]

的趋势。[结论

]

土壤侵蚀强度总体以微度和轻度为主，强烈侵蚀、极强烈侵蚀、剧烈侵蚀主要分布在流域的中下游和下游；天山北坡西白杨沟流域侵蚀强度的空间分布与地形、土地利用、土壤性质联系紧密。

Abstract

[Objective] Quantitative assessment of soil erosion in West Baiyanggou watershed on the north slopes of Tianshan Mountains and its distribution characteristics were studied in order to provide the scientific basis for ecological management and soil erosion control.[Methods] Taking the West Baiyanggou watershed in Urumqi County of Xijiang Wei Autonomous Region as the research area

using the methods of sampling plot survey

geographic information system(GIS)

remote sensing system(RS) and CSLE model

soil erosion was assessed and the spatial distribution of erosion intensity was analyzed.[Results] The average soil erosion modulus was 748.91 t/(km2·a) in the West Baiyanggou watershed on the north slope of the Tianshan Mountains. In most areas of this watershed

the intensity of soil erosion was at weak or slight level. Strong

extreme or severe erosions were mainly distributed in the middle and lower reaches of the basin. Soil erosion was significantly impacted by the topographic factors. In the regions with slope of 20°~40°

the highest soil erosion modulus varied between 1 127.22~1 229.62 t/(km2·a). In the regions with slope < 20°

the slope factor has a positive effect on the soil erosion modulus. While in the regions with slope of 40°~70°

the slope factor has a negative effect on the soil erosion modulus. Soil erosion mainly occurred on the south slope

southeast slope and east slope

and influenced by land use types with the following rank:shrub land[1 709.80 t/(km2·a)] > woodland[1 389.40 t/(km2·a)] > natural grassland[605.20 t/(km2·a)] > artificial pasture[334.71 t/(km2·a)] > irrigated land[113.69 t/(km2·a)].[Conclusion] The intensity of soil erosion is generally at slightness and lightness level. Strong erosion

extremely strong erosion

and severe erosion are mainly distributed in the middle and lower reaches of the basin. Soil properties

slope and land use types were closely related to the soil erosion distribution in the study area.

关键词

Keywords

references

Meyer L D. Evolution of the universal soil loss equation[J]. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation[J], 1984, 39(2):99-104.

Graaff J D, Aklilua, Ouessar M, et al. The development of soil and water conservation policies and practices in five selected countries from 1960 to 2010[J]. Land Use Policy, 2013, 32(3):165-174.

李天杰.土壤地理学[M].北京:高等教育出版社,2004.

魏兰香,曹广超,曹生奎,等.基于USLE模型的祁连山南坡土壤侵蚀现状评价[J].武汉工程大学学报,2017,39(3):288-295.

Vanrompaey A J J, Gerardgovers. Data quality and model complexity for regional scale soil erosion prediction[J]. International Journal of Geographical Information Systems, 2002, 16(7):663-680.

Siakeu J, Oguchi T. Soil erosion analysis and modelling:A review[J]. Chikei, 2000, 21(4):413-429.

Ganasri B P, Ramesh H. Assessment of soil erosion by RUSLE model using remote sensing and GIS:A case study of Nethravathi Basin[J]. Geoscience Frontiers, 2016, 7(6):953-961.

Fernández C, Vega J A. Evaluation of RUSLE and PESERA models for predicting soil erosion losses in the first year after wildfire in NW Spain[J]. Geoderma, 2016, 273:64-72.

Djoukbala O, Mazour M, Hasbaia M, et al. Estimating of water erosion in semiarid regions using RUSLE equation under GIS environment[J]. Environmental Earth Sciences, 2018, 77(9):345-352.

Wischmeier W H. et a l. A soil erodibility nomograph farmland and construction sites[J]. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 1971, 26, 189-193.

Wischmerier W H, Smith D D. Predicting rainfall erosion losses-a guide to conservation planning[R]. Washington:Agrichlture Handook, 1978.

Renard K G, Foster G R, Weesies G A, et al. Predicting soil erosion by water:A guide to conservation planning with the revised universal soil Loss equation(RUSLE)[M]. US:Agriculture Handbook, 1997.

胡良军, 李锐, 杨勤科, 等. 基于GIS的区域水土流失评价模型[J]. 应用基础与工程科学学报, 2000, 8(1):1-8.

林慧龙, 郑舒婷, 王雪璐. 基于RUSLE模型的三江源高寒草地土壤侵蚀评价[J]. 草业学报, 2017, 26(7):11-22.

刘波, 齐述华, 廖富强, 等. 土壤水力侵蚀的遥感信息模型研究:以江西省为例[J]. 武汉大学学报:信息科学版, 2012, 37(4):389-393.

杨冉冉, 徐涵秋, 林娜, 等. 基于RUSLE的福建省长汀县河田盆地区土壤侵蚀定量研究[J]. 生态学报, 2013, 33(10):2974-2982.

Liu Baoyuan, Zhang Keli, Xie Yun. An empirical soil loss equation[C]. Beijing:International Soil Conservation Organization Conference, 2002.

程琳, 杨勤科, 谢红霞, 等. 基于GIS和CSLE的陕西省土壤侵蚀定量评价方法研究[J]. 水土保持学报, 2009, 23(5):61-66.

王凯, 夏燕秋, 马金辉, 等. 基于CSLE和高分辨率航空影像的孤山川流域土壤侵蚀定量评价[J]. 水土保持研究, 2015, 22(1):26-32.

樊彦国, 韩志聪, 李倩倩, 等. 基于GIS和CSLE的土壤侵蚀定量评价:以山东省临沂地区为例[J]. 江苏农业科学, 2016, 44(11):439-442.

李大龙, 杨井, 李卫红, 等. 基于GIS和USLE的伊犁河谷土壤侵蚀敏感性评价[J]. 生态学杂志,2016,35(4):942-951.

李小华, 曹月娥, 杨建军. 人工模拟降雨条件下伊犁河流域黄土区土壤侵蚀试验分析[J]. 水土保持学报,2016,30(1):36-40.

慈晖,张强,张江辉,等.1961-2010年新疆极端降水过程时空特征[J].地理研究,2014,33(10):1881-1891.

张正勇,何新林,刘琳,等.中国天山山区降水空间分布模拟及成因分析[J].水科学进展,2015,26(4):500-508.

韩雪云, 杨青, 姚俊强. 新疆天山山区近51年来降水变化特征[J]. 水土保持研究,2013,20(2):139-144.

Sharpley A N, Williams J R. EPIC-erosion/productivity impact calculator(2):User manual[J]. Technical Bulletin-United States Department of Agriculture, 1990, 4(4):206-207.

梁音,刘宪春,曹龙熹,等.中国水蚀区土壤可蚀性K值计算与宏观分布[J].中国水土保持,2013(10):35-40.

Foster G R, Wischmeier W H. Evaluating irregular slopes for soil loss prediction[J]. Trans ASAE Gen Ed Am Soc Agric Eng, 1974, 17:305-309.

刘宝元, 毕小刚, 符素华, 等. 北京土壤流失方程[M]. 北京:科学出版社, 2010.

Mccool D K, Brown L C, Foster G R, et al. Revised slope steepness factor for the universal soil loss equation[J]. Transactions of the ASAE:American Society of Agricultural Engineers(USA), 1987,30(5):1387-1396.

Liu Baoyuan, Nearing M A, Risse M. Slope gradient effects on soil loss for steep slopes[J]. Transactions of the ASAE, 1994, 37(6):1835-1840.

Choudhury J, Ahmed N U, Idso S B, et al. Relations between evaporation coefficients and vegetation indices studied by model simulations[J]. Remote Sensing of Environment, 1994, 50(1):1-17.

蔡崇法, 丁树文. 应用USLE模型与地理信息系统IDRISI预测流域土壤侵蚀量的研究[J].水土保持学报,2000,14(2):19-24.

中华人民共和国水利部. 第一次全国水利普查水土保持情况公报[J]. 中国水土保持,2013(10):2-3.

郭索彦. 基于全国土壤侵蚀普查成果浅谈新疆维吾尔自治区水土流失防治方略[C]//新疆乌鲁木齐:新疆水利厅、中国水土保持学会. 首届干旱半干旱区域水土保持生态保护论坛论文选编. 2013.

张宏锋,欧阳志云,郑华.天山北坡水土流失生态效应的动态变化及其影响因素分析:以玛纳斯河流域为例[C]//新疆乌鲁木齐:中国生态学会青年工作委员会.第五届中国青年生态学工作者学术研讨会论文集,2008.

浏览量

1156

下载量

CSCD

文章被引用时，请邮件提醒。

提交

工具集

关联资源

GIS支持下辽河中下游土壤侵蚀遥感动态分析

福建省水蚀区土壤侵蚀遥感监测技术探讨

陇东黄土高原土壤侵蚀变化定量遥感监测——以黄土高原水保二期世行贷款庆城项目区为例

辽宁省细河流域土壤侵蚀监测方法对比研究

遥感技术在土壤侵蚀研究中的应用述评