1. 浙江大学 环境与资源学院,浙江,杭州,310058
2. 河南师范大学 旅游学院,河南,新乡,453007
3. 广西大学 商学院,广西,南宁,530004
纸质出版:2019
移动端阅览
杨东伟, 章明奎, 刘千千, 等. 土壤理化性质和微生物活性对水田改果园的动态响应[J]. 水土保持通报, 2019,39(2):48-55.
Yang Dongwei, Zhang Mingkui, Liu Qianqian, et al. Response of Soil Physicochemical Properties and Microbial Activity on Land-use Conversion from Paddy Field to Orchard Farm[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2019, 39(2): 48-55.
杨东伟, 章明奎, 刘千千, 等. 土壤理化性质和微生物活性对水田改果园的动态响应[J]. 水土保持通报, 2019,39(2):48-55. DOI: 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2019.02.008.
Yang Dongwei, Zhang Mingkui, Liu Qianqian, et al. Response of Soil Physicochemical Properties and Microbial Activity on Land-use Conversion from Paddy Field to Orchard Farm[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2019, 39(2): 48-55. DOI: 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2019.02.008.
[目的]探讨土壤微生物特性及环境因子对水田改果园的动态响应规律,为进一步研究土地利用变化对土壤生态环境的影响,预测水田改果园后土壤质量的长期变化趋势提供科学依据。[方法]在浙江省范围内选择1个代表性的水田改果园土壤系列,采用后切时间序列法,分析水田改果园后土壤理化性质、土壤微生物生物量及酶活性等指标的动态响应规律。[结果]水田改果园后,土壤含水率、>0.25 mm水稳定性团聚体、pH值、有机质、盐基饱和度、全氮、碱解氮含量显著(p<0.01)下降,全钾、有效钾、全磷和有效磷含量分别增加了21.9%,54.7%,42.0%和6.65倍,并且这些指标都与植树年限呈极显著(p<0.01)相关。改果园后,土壤微生物生物量碳和氮平均含量分别下降了74.4%和73.3%,土壤脲酶和酸性磷酸酶活性平均值分别增加了40.0%和41.8%,土壤过氧化氢酶活性平均值下降69.3%,并都与植树年限呈极显著相关(p<0.01)。[结论]水田改果园后土壤环境因子发生阶段性变化,且土地利用方式的影响要大于利用年限的影响。水田改果园后土壤综合肥力下降,并对生态环境和土地可持续利用带来不利影响。
[Objective] The dynamic response of soil microbial characteristics and environmental factors to the change of paddy fields into orchards was discussed in order to provide a scientific basis for further study of the impact of land use change on soil ecological environment and prediction of the long-term change trend of soil quality after the change of paddy fields to orchards.[Methods] One representative soil series of land-use change from paddy to orchard were chosen in Zhejiang Province
furthermore
the law of dynamic response of soil physicochemical properties
enzyme activity and soil microbial biomass to land-use change was analyzed using the post-cut time series method.[Results] Soil moisture
> 0.25 mm water stable aggregate
pH value
organic matter
base saturation
total nitrogen and alkali-hydrolyzable nitrogen fell down significantly(p < 0.01)
however
total phosphorus
available phosphorus and available potassium increased by 21.9%
54.7%
42.0% and 6.65 times
respectively
and these indexes were correlated with years of planting trees significantly(p < 0.01). After the land-use change
the average of soil microbial biomass carbon and nitrogen decreased by 74.4% and 73.3%
respectively. The average of soil urease and acid phosphatase activity increased by 40.0% and 41.8%
respectively. However
the mean value of soil catalase activity decreased by 69.3%
and they were significantly(p < 0.01) correlated with the time of planting trees.[Conclusion] After the land-use conversion from the paddy field to orchard farm
soil environmental factors changed periodically
and the influence of land-use pattern was greater than that of land-use history. Moreover
soil comprehensive fertility decreased
and the ecological environment and sustainability of land use were adversely affected.
王军,顿耀龙. 土地利用变化对生态系统服务的影响研究综述[J]. 长江流域资源与环境,2015,24(5):798-808.
朱永官,沈仁芳,贺纪正,等. 中国土壤微生物组:进展与展望[J]. 中国科学院院刊,2017,32(6):554-565.
邵颖,刘长海. 土壤微生物与植被、温度及水分关系的研究进展[J]. 延安大学学报:自然科学版,2017,36(4):43-48.
李鹏,濮励杰,章锦河. 旅游活动对土壤环境影响的国内研究进展[J]. 地理科学进展,2012,31(8):1097-1105.
杨丽. 旅游活动下罗浮山格木种群和土壤性质的变化[J]. 西南农业学报,2016,29(7):1672-1677.
Muleski G E, Jr C C, Kinsey J S. Particulate emissions from construction activities[J]. Journal of the Air and Waste Management Association, 2005,55(6):772-783.
Takahashi T, Park C Y, Nakajima H, et al. Ferric iron transformation in soils with rotation of irrigated rice-upland crops and effect on soil tillage properties[J]. Soil Science and Plant Nutrition, 1999,45(1):163-173.
尹睿,张华勇,黄锦法,等. 保护地菜田与稻麦轮作田土壤微生物学特征的比较[J]. 植物营养与肥料,2004,10(1):57-62.
张健,陈凤,濮励杰,等. 经济快速增长区土地利用变化对土壤质量影响研究[J]. 环境科学研究,2007,20(5):99-104.
王晋,庄舜尧,朱兆良. 不同种植年限水田与果园土壤有机氮组分变化[J]. 土壤学报,2014,51(2):286-294.
孔樟良,季淑枫,章明奎,等.水田长期改种蔬菜土壤化学性状变化特征[J]. 中国农学通报,2015,31(23):147-152.
麻万诸,章明奎. 中国土系志(浙江卷)[M]. 北京:科学技术出版社,2017:1-350.
张甘霖,龚子同.土壤调查实验室分析方法[M]. 北京:科学出版社,2012:1-243.
关松荫.土壤酶及其研究法[M]. 北京:农业出版社,1986:14-333.
Lin Q, Brookes P C. An evaluation of the substrate-induced respiration method[J]. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 1999,31(14):1969-1983.
文倩,赵小蓉,陈焕伟,等.半干旱地区不同土壤团聚体中微生物量碳的分布特征[J]. 中国农业科学,2004, 37(10):1504-1509.
张金波,宋长春. 土地利用方式对土壤碳库影响的敏感性评价指标.生态环境[J],2003,12(4):500-504.
Sparling G P. Ratio of microbial biomass carbon to soil organic carbon as a sensitive indicator of changes in soil organic matter[J]. Australia Journal of Soil Research, 1992, 30(2):195-207.
章明奎,唐红娟,常跃畅. 黄斑田(铁聚水耕人为土)返旱后土壤发生学性质的变化[C]//面向未来的土壤科学(上册):中国土壤学会第十二次全国会员代表大会暨第九届海峡两岸土壤肥料学术交流研讨会论文集。四川成都:电子科技大学出版社,2012.
韩书成,濮励杰,陈凤,等. 长江三角洲典型地区土壤性质对土地利用变化的响应:以江苏省锡山市为例[J].土壤学报,2007,44(4):612-619.
徐阳春,沈其荣. 长期免耕与施用有机肥对土壤微生物生物量碳,氮,磷的影响[J]. 土壤学报,2002,39(1):89-96.
唐玉姝,魏朝富,颜廷梅,等. 土壤质量生物学指标研究进展[J]. 土壤,2007,39(2):157-163.
刘善江,夏雪,陈桂梅,等. 土壤酶的研究进展[J]. 中国农学通报,2011,27(21):1-7.
田慧,谭周进,屠乃美,等. 少免耕土壤生态学效应研究进展[J]. 耕作与栽培,2006(5):10-12.
冉炜,沈其荣. 尿素浓度、培养时间和温度对3种土壤尿素水解过程的影响[J]. 南京农业大学学报,2000,23(2):43-46.
Cabrera M L, Kissel D E, Bock B R. Urea hydrolysis in soil:effects of urea concentration and soil pH[J]. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 1991, 23(12):1121-1124.
张华勇,尹睿,黄锦法,等. 稻麦轮作田改为菜地后生化指标的变化[J]. 土壤,2005,37(2):182-186.
颜慧,钟文辉,李忠佩,等. 长期施肥对红壤水稻土磷脂脂肪酸特性和酶活性的影响[J]. 应用生态学报,2008,19(1):71-75.
万忠梅,吴景贵. 土壤酶活性影响因子研究进展[J]. 西北农林科技大学学报:自然科学版,2005,33(6):87-92.
王丽,梁智. 南疆棉花连作对土壤酶活性的影响:以新疆生产建设兵团农一师10团为例[J]. 新疆农业大学学报,2008,31(6):50-53.
梅守荣. 土壤酶活性及其测定[J]. 上海农业科技,1985(1):17-18.
0
浏览量
1266
下载量
4
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010802024621