1. 北京市门头沟区国家生态修复科技综合示范基地,北京,102300
2. 北京林业大学 水土保持学院 水土保持国家林业局重点实验室 北京市水土保持工程技术研究中心 林业生态工程教育部工程研究中心,北京,100083
纸质出版:2018
移动端阅览
孙嘉, 伍冰晨, 齐实, 等. 北京市门头沟区采砂废弃地治理遥感评价[J]. 水土保持通报, 2018,38(2):246-252.
SUN Jia, WU Bingchen, QI Shi, et al. Assessment on Sandpits Wasteland of Mentougou District in Beijing City Using Remote Sensing[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2018, 38(2): 246-252.
孙嘉, 伍冰晨, 齐实, 等. 北京市门头沟区采砂废弃地治理遥感评价[J]. 水土保持通报, 2018,38(2):246-252. DOI: 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.20180227.001.
SUN Jia, WU Bingchen, QI Shi, et al. Assessment on Sandpits Wasteland of Mentougou District in Beijing City Using Remote Sensing[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2018, 38(2): 246-252. DOI: 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.20180227.001.
[目的]对北京市门头沟区采砂废弃地治理进行遥感评价,为北京市政府进行采砂废弃地这一典型退化生态系统的生态修复和景观重建提供依据。[方法]基于门头沟区采砂废弃地遥感影像及实地调研,对各采砂废弃地的规划利用方向进行分类,同时利用综合指数法、GIS分析法和专家打分法等景观评价方法,选取相应的评价因子建立评价模型,对门头沟区采砂废弃地的生态治理效果进行综合评价。[结果]门头沟区采砂废弃地规划利用方式为公共绿地及公园、自然生态恢复区、建设用地、基本农田、河道综合治理区5大类别,治理效果表现为:公共绿地及公园>河道综合治理>基本农田>建设用地>自然生态恢复区。[结论]门头沟区治理近10 a来,采砂废弃地规划利用及生态修复取得了显著成效,总体生态治理效果达到近理想的状态,其中公共绿地及公园的治理效果接近理想状态,无论从植被覆盖度还是景观协调度方面都体现出更好的恢复效果,而自然生态恢复方式效果一般,对采砂废弃地不宜采取该种方式。
[Objective] Using remote sensing to evaluate the treatment of sandpits wasteland in Mentougou District of Beijing City
to provide references for typical degraded ecosystem's ecological restoration and landscape reconsreuction for Beijing government.[Methods] Based on remote sensing image and field investigation
the possible utilization ways for all sandpits wastelands were listed. At the same time
we used landscape evaluation methods such as synthetic index method
GIS analytic method and expert scoring method
and selected relevant evaluating factor to establish an evaluation model. Finally we made a comprehensive evaluation system for the ecological management effect of sandpits wasteland in Mentougou District.[Results] The evaluation results showed that types of utilization on sandpits wasteland in Mentougou District can be divided into five ways:public green area or park
natural ecological restoration area
construction land
basic farmland
river comprehensive treatment area. The ecological management effect can be graded as public green area or park > river comprehensive treatment area > basic farmland > construction land > natural ecological restoration area.[Conclusion] In the past ten years
the utilization and ecological restoration of sandpits wasteland had got remarkable achievement
the overall effect of ecological treatment has reached a fine condition
especially
for public green area or park
from the aspects of vegetation coverage and landscape coordination
they got better recovery effects. However
the effect of natural ecological restoration was not good enough
way of natural ecological restoration is not suitable on sandpits wasteland.
杜海萍,陈睿.涵养生态造福千秋万代:访中共门头沟区委副书记、区长刘云广[J].前线,2008(10):22-24.
白杨,黄宇驰,王敏,等.我国生态文明建设及其评估体系研究进展[J].生态学报,2011,31(20):6295-6304.
钱一武.北京市门头沟区生态修复综合效益价值评估研究[D].北京:北京林业大学,2010.
田军.门头沟区:生态修复的历程与模式[J].科技潮,2010(7):34-37.
马升平.北京市门头沟区生态修复效益综合评价研究[D].北京:北京林业大学,2011.
杨鸣婵,姜其贵.北京市平原区砂石坑综合治理利用思路[J].水利规划与设计,2010(3):46-49.
胡振琪,王培俊,邵芳.引黄河泥沙充填复垦采煤沉陷地技术的试验研究[J].农业工程学报,2015,31(3):288-295.
左长清,李小强.红壤丘陵区坡改梯的水土保持效果研究[J].水土保持通报,2004,24(6):79-81.
李文武.基于遥感技术的植被覆盖度信息提取[J].科技资讯,2012(18):149-150.
胡振琪,龙精华,王新静.论煤矿区生态环境的自修复、自然修复和人工修复[J].煤炭学报,2014(8):1751-1757.
蔡宏,何政伟,安艳玲,等.基于RS和GIS的赤水河流域植被覆盖度与各地形因子的相关强度研究[J].地球与环境, 2014(4):518-524.
唐颖,贾海峰,王军,等.基于遥感技术的北京市平原区砂石坑识别探索[J].遥感信息,2008(4):76-80.
0
浏览量
798
下载量
0
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010802024621