1. 贵州省环境科学研究设计院,贵州,贵阳,550081
2. 河南理工大学 测绘与国土信息工程学院,河南,焦作,454003
3. 中国电建集团贵阳勘测设计研究院有限公司,贵州,贵阳,550081
4. 南京铱迅信息技术股份有限公司,江苏,南京,210000
5. 环境保护部南京环境科学研究所,江苏,南京,210042
6. 贵州省义龙新区农林水务和移民局, 贵州 义龙,562409
纸质出版:2018
移动端阅览
黄贤峰, 杨永菊, 武艺, 等. 1990-2017年喀斯特自然保护区土地利用变化对生境质量的影响[J]. 水土保持通报, 2018,38(6):345-351.
HUANG Xianfeng, YANG Yongju, WU Yi, et al. Land Use Change and Its Impact on Habitat Quality in Karst Nature Reserve from 1990 to 2017[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2018, 38(6): 345-351.
黄贤峰, 杨永菊, 武艺, 等. 1990-2017年喀斯特自然保护区土地利用变化对生境质量的影响[J]. 水土保持通报, 2018,38(6):345-351. DOI: 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2018.06.052.
HUANG Xianfeng, YANG Yongju, WU Yi, et al. Land Use Change and Its Impact on Habitat Quality in Karst Nature Reserve from 1990 to 2017[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2018, 38(6): 345-351. DOI: 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2018.06.052.
[目的] 探讨自然保护区生境质量变化规律及其影响因素,为制定有效的区域生态保护政策提供科学依据。[方法] 基于Landsat系列影像数据,采用生境质量估算模型与土地利用转型生境贡献率,以贵州省兴义市坡岗自然保护区为例,分析土地利用变化对不同功能分区生境质量的影响并定量评估退耕还林还草政策情景对生境质量改善效果。[结果] 1990—2017年自然保护区土地流转主要发生在草地和耕地转为林地、其他类型转为草地和林地间。28 a保护区平均生境质量提高15.71%,且呈现先增加后减少的趋势。1990年保护区平均生境质量表现为:缓冲区 > 核心区 > 试验区,2001年以后转换为:核心区 > 缓冲区 > 试验区。在退耕还林还草政策情景下,坡岗自然保护区平均生境质量从当前情景的0.88提高到0.92,生境质量改善。[结论] 坡岗自然保护区的建立、退耕还林还草工程的实施以及人类活动的增加是影响保护区生境质量变化的主要原因。
[Objective] The changes of habitat quality and its affecting factors in the nature reserve were studied for the formulation of effective local ecological protection policies.[Methods] Taking the Pogang nature reserve in Xingyi City of Guizhou Province as an example
based on the images of Landsat-5 TM
Landsat-7 ETM+
Landsat-8 OLI
and combining ArcGIS with ENVI software
we used habitat quality estimation model and habitat quality contribution rate of land use transformation to analyze the land use change and its impact on habitat quality from 1990 to 2017 and to quantitatively assess the effect of the policy of grain for green on the improvement of habitat quality.[Results] The land transformation of reserve mainly occurred from grassland and cultivated land to forest land
and from other land types to grassland and forest land from 1990 to 2017. During the past 28 years
the overall habitat quality of the reserve showed a trend of first increase and subsequent decrease. The increase was by 15.71% in comparison with the value in 1990. The average habitat quality of the reserve in 1990 was ranked as:buffer area > core area > pilot area; whereas the average habitat quality of the reserve after 2001 was the core area > buffer area > pilot area. As the policy of grain for green was carried out
the average habitat quality index of Pogang Nature Reserve increased significantly from 0.88 to 0.92.[Conclusion] The establishment of Pogang Nature Reserve
the implementation of the reforestation project and the increase of human activities are the main reasons for the change of the habitat quality.
刘华, 蔡颖, 於梦秋, 等. 太湖流域宜兴片河流生境质量评价[J]. 生态学杂志, 2012, 31(5):1288-1295.
张大智, 孙小银, 袁兴中, 等. 南四湖流域1980-2015年土地利用变化及其对流域生境质量的影响[J]. 湖泊科学, 2018, 30(2):349-357.
Li Guangdong, Fang Chuanglin, Wang Shaojian. Exploring spatiotemporal changes in ecosystem-service values and hotspots in China[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2016, 545/546:609-620.
刘爱琳, 匡文慧, 闫慧敏, 等. 2000-2015年城市和工矿用地扩张对净初级生产力的影响[J]. 干旱区地理, 2017,40(4):805-816.
乔旭宁,顾羊羊,邹长新,等.基于夜间灯光数据的太湖流域城镇扩张对净初级生产力的影响[J]. 生态学报, 2018, 38(16):5883-5893.
杨洋, 黄庆旭, 章立玲. 基于DMSP/OLS夜间灯光数据的土地城镇化水平时空测度研究:以环渤海地区为例[J]. 经济地理, 2015, 35(2):141-148,168.
Ellis E C, Goldewijk K K, Siebert S, et al. Anthropogenic transformation of the biomes, 1700 to 2000[J]. Global Ecology & Biogeography, 2010, 19(5):589-606.
Valero E, Álvarez X, Picos J. An assessment of river habitat quality as an indicator of conservation status:A case study in the Northwest of Spain[J]. Ecological Indicators, 2015, 57(C):131-138.
王琼, 范志平, 李法云, 等. 蒲河流域河流生境质量综合评价及其与水质响应关系[J]. 生态学杂志, 2015, 34(2):516-523.
Tang Xuguang, Li Hengpeng, Xu Xibao, et al. Changing land use and its impact on the habitat suitability for wintering Anseriformes in China's Poyang Lake region[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2016, 557/558:296-306.
陈妍, 乔飞, 江磊. 基于InVEST模型的土地利用格局变化对区域尺度生境质量的影响研究:以北京为例[J]. 北京大学学报:自然科学版, 2016, 52(3):553-562.
巩杰, 马学成, 张玲玲, 等. 基于InVEST模型的甘肃白龙江流域生境质量时空分异[J]. 水土保持研究, 2018, 25(3):191-196.
潘韬, 吴绍洪, 戴尔阜, 等. 基于InVEST模型的三江源区生态系统水源供给服务时空变化[J]. 应用生态学报, 2013, 24(1):183-189.
周彬, 余新晓, 陈丽华, 等. 基于InVEST模型的北京山区土壤侵蚀模拟[J]. 水土保持研究, 2010, 17(6):9-13,19.
Terrado M, Sabater S, Chaplin-Kramer B, et al. Model development for the assessment of terrestrial and aquatic habitat quality in conservation planning[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2016,540(1):63-70.
张华海, 龙启德, 廖德平. 兴义坡岗自然保护区综合科学考察集[M]. 贵州贵阳:贵州科技出版社, 2006.
王丹竹. 贵州乡村旅游开发的战略构想:以兴义市坡岗为例[J]. 兴义民族师范学院学报, 2011(1):15-17,22.
张磊, 吴炳方, 李晓松, 等. 基于碳收支的中国土地覆被分类系统[J]. 生态学报, 2014, 34(24):7158-7166.
Sharp R, Tallis H T, Ricketts T, et al. InVEST VERSION User's Guide[M]. The Natural Capital Project, Stanford University, University of Minnesota, The Nature Conservancy, and World Wildlife Fund, 2016.
胡锋, 安裕伦, 赵海兵. 基于土地利用转型视角的"亚喀斯特"区域生态环境效应研究:以黔中部分地区为例[J]. 地球与环境, 2016, 44(4):447-454.
0
浏览量
1001
下载量
22
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010802024621