1. 长安大学 环境科学与工程学院,陕西,西安,710054
2. 旱区地下水文与生态效应教育部重点实验室,陕西,西安,710054
纸质出版:2018
移动端阅览
李鑫, 卢玉东, 张晓周, 等. 基于X-ray CT的古土壤孔裂隙识别与表征[J]. 水土保持通报, 2018,38(6):224-230.
LI Xin, LU Yudong, ZHANG Xiaozhou, et al. Pore-fissure Identification and Characterization of Paleosol Based on X-ray Computed Tomography[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2018, 38(6): 224-230.
李鑫, 卢玉东, 张晓周, 等. 基于X-ray CT的古土壤孔裂隙识别与表征[J]. 水土保持通报, 2018,38(6):224-230. DOI: 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2018.06.035.
LI Xin, LU Yudong, ZHANG Xiaozhou, et al. Pore-fissure Identification and Characterization of Paleosol Based on X-ray Computed Tomography[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2018, 38(6): 224-230. DOI: 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2018.06.035.
[目的
]
对古土壤内部孔隙裂隙结构的形态、类型、孔径分布进行精确表征,为斜坡中古土壤水力学性质的研究提供重要依据。[方法
]
利用X-ray CT对泾阳南塬S
5
古土壤原状试样进行扫描,利用VG studio Max和AVIZO三维可视化软件,经过滤波处理、阈值分割、三维重建得到了三维可视化数字古土壤模型,计算了二三维孔隙度,基于形状因子提取了古土壤中孔隙和裂隙并进行分类,提出了各类空隙的孔径表征算法。[结果
]
①古土壤中孔裂隙并存,在空间上具有显著的垂向性和空间异质性,在空间形态上可由形状因子(SF)区分为裂隙(SF > 40.18)、枝杈状孔隙(7.01
<
SF≤40.18)、长柱状孔隙(2.0
<
SF≤7.01)、椭球状孔隙(1
<
SF≤2)和球状孔隙(SF≤1);②大孔隙度(等效直径大于100 μm)为9.86%,占总孔隙度(41.18%)的23.94%,表明古土壤中以等效直径为100 μm以下的孔裂隙为主; ③孔径分布在0.1~5 mm之间,以0.1~0.7 mm为主,而体积贡献率上以0.7~1.0 mm为主,裂隙最大开度5.1 mm。[结论
]
古土壤是一种以中小微孔隙为主,(特)大孔隙和(微)裂隙伴生的双重介质土体,X-ray CT和三维可视化重建技术为古土壤孔裂隙识别和表征提供了一种有效的途径。
[Objective] Characterization of the shape
type and spatial distribution of pore-fissure structure in paleosol was conducted accurately in order to provide an important basis for the study of hydraulic properties of paleosol in slopes.[Methods] X-ray CT was used to scan the undisturbed samples of S5 paleosol at southern tableland of Jingyang County
Shaanxi Province. Three-dimensional digital paleosol model was established through filtering
thresholding and reconstruction by using 3D visualization software including VG studio Max and AVIZO. The two and three dimensional porosity were calculated
pores and fissures in paleosol were extracted and classified based on shape factors
and the characterization algorithms for various voids were proposed.[Results] ① The pores and fissures coexisted in paleosol
which was of significant verticality and spatial heterogeneity in space. The voids could be differentiated by the shape factors (SFs) into fissures (SF > 40.18)
branching pores (7.01 < SF ≤ 40.18)
long columnar pores (2.0 < SF ≤ 7.01)
ellipsoidal pores (1 < SF ≤ 2)
and spherical pores (SF ≤ 1) on spatial pattern; ② the macroporosity (the equal diameter larger than 100 μm) is 9.86%
accounting for 23.94% of the total porosity (41.18%)
indicating that the voids with equal diameter smaller than 100 μm are dominant in paleosol; ③ the pore size distribution is between 0.1~5 mm
in which the pores within 0.1~0.7 mm are in the majority on count
and the pores within 0.7~1.0 mm are in the majority of volume contribution rate
and the maximum fissure opening is 5.1 mm.[Conclusion] Paleosol is a kind of double-medium soil with majority of micro
small
medium pores as well as special large pores or macropores accompanying micro fissures or fractures. In addition
X-ray CT and 3D visualization reconstruction technology provides an effective method for the identification and characterization of pore-fissure structures in paleosol.
曹伯勋.地貌学及第四纪地质学[M].北京:中国地质大学出版社,1995.
Mcarthur J M, Nath B, Banerjee D M, et al. Palaeosol control on groundwater flow and pollutant distribution:the example of arsenic[J]. Environmental Science & Technology, 2011,45(4):1376.
赵景波,阴雷鹏,郁耀闯,等.陕西长武黄土剖面L
3
-S
6
土层渗透性研究[J].第四纪研究,2009,29(1):108-115.
谢超.泾阳南塬黄土渗透特性及黄土滑坡研究[D].陕西西安:长安大学,2016.
温晓坤.泾河南岸Q
2
古土壤控滑机理研究[D].陕西西安:长安大学,2017.
张常亮,李萍,李同录,等.黄土中降雨入渗规律的现场监测研究[J].水利学报,2014,45(6):728-734.
徐张建,林在贯,张茂省.中国黄土与黄土滑坡[J].岩石力学与工程学报,2007,26(7):1297-1312.
曹春山,吴树仁,潘懋,等.古土壤力学特性及其对黄土滑坡的意义[J].水文地质工程地质,2016,43(5):127-132.
郭晨,许强,魏勇,等.陕西泾阳南塬蒋刘4
#
滑坡运动堆积特征及流动性成因分析[J].科学技术与工程,2017,17(27):15-25.
高国瑞.中国黄土的微结构[J].科学通报,1980,25(20):945-948.
雷祥义.西安附近黄士孔隙特征[J].水文地质工程地质,1984,27(4):33,38-41.
李晓军,张登良. CT技术在土体结构性分析中的应用初探[J].岩土力学,1999,20(2):62-66.
谷天峰,王家鼎,郭乐,等.基于图像处理的Q
3
黄土的微观结构变化研究[J].岩石力学与工程学报,2011,30(S1):3185-3192.
陈琼,项伟,崔德山,等.黄土坡滑坡滑带土氮气与水蒸气吸附试验研究[J].岩土工程学报,2013,47(4):691-696.
程亚南,刘建立,吕菲,等.基于CT图像的土壤孔隙结构三维重建及水力学性质预测[J].农业工程学报,2012,28(22):115-122.
潘网生.黄土优先流渗流特性及斜坡优势滑动面研究[D].陕西西安:长安大学,2015.
潘网生,许玉凤,卢玉东,等.基于非均匀性和分形维数的黄土优先流特征定量分析[J].农业工程学报,2017,33(3):140-147.
Li Xi' an, Li Lincui. Quantification of the pore structures of Malan loess and the effects on loess permeability and environmental significance, Shaanxi Province, China:An experimental study[J]. Environmental Earth Sciences, 2017,76(15):522-535.
Li Yanrong, He Shengdi, Deng Xiaohong, et al. Characterization of macropore structure of Malan loess in China based on 3D pipe models constructed by using computed tomography technology[J]. Journal of Asian Earth Sciences,2018,154(4):271-279.
延恺,谷天峰,王家鼎,等.基于显微CT图像的黄土微结构研究[J].水文地质工程地质,2018,45(3):71-77.
Li Lin, Wen Kejun, Li Chi, et al. FIB/SEM imaging of microbial induced calcite precipitation in sandy soil[J]. Microscopy & Microanalysis, 2017,23(S1):310-311.
Pautler B G, Sanborn P T, Simpson A J, et al. Molecular characterization of organic matter in Canadian Arctic paleosols for paleoecological applications[J]. Organic Geochemistry, 2013,63(5):122-138.
Carmignato S, Dewulf W, Leach R. Industrial X-ray computed tomography[M]. Cham, Switzerland:Springer, International Publishing, 2018.
FEI, SAS. Avizo9 User's Guide[M]. Berlin, Germany:FEI,2016.
王玉灵.基于双边滤波的图像处理算法研究[D].陕西西安:西安电子科技大学,2010.
王浩宇.基于工业CT断层切片数据的逆向设计优化技术研究[D].重庆:重庆大学;2016.
中国国家标准化管理委员会.GB/T21650.1-2008压汞法和气体吸附法测定固体材料孔径分布和孔隙度:第1部分(压汞法)[S].北京:中国标准出版社,2008.
徐芹选,赵景波,祁晓丽.黄土孔隙度及粒度组成关系初探[J].西安工程学院学报,2000,22(1):67-70.
0
浏览量
1226
下载量
3
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010802024621