1. 山西农业大学 城乡建设学院, 山西 太谷,030801
2. 西北农林科技大学 水利与建筑工程学院, 陕西 杨凌,712100
纸质出版:2018
移动端阅览
王炜, 骆亚生. 剪切方式对重塑黄土残余强度的影响[J]. 水土保持通报, 2018,38(6):177-181.
WANG Wei, LUO Yasheng. Effect of Different Ring Shear Tests on Residual Strength of Remolded Loess[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2018, 38(6): 177-181.
王炜, 骆亚生. 剪切方式对重塑黄土残余强度的影响[J]. 水土保持通报, 2018,38(6):177-181. DOI: 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2018.06.027.
WANG Wei, LUO Yasheng. Effect of Different Ring Shear Tests on Residual Strength of Remolded Loess[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2018, 38(6): 177-181. DOI: 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2018.06.027.
[目的] 探究剪切方式对重塑黄土残余强度的影响,为黄土滑坡工程评价及治理提供科学依据。[方法] 利用环剪仪对泾阳重塑黄土进行环剪试验。[结果] 重塑黄土的峰值强度及残余强度均随着有效法向应力的增加而增大。随着有效法向应力的增加,土体达到残余强度所需的剪切位移减小;重塑黄土的变形表现为受剪压缩。单级剪得到的残余强度指标值与多级剪切得到的残余强度指标值的均值相近。[结论] 剪切方式建议首选单级剪切。
[Objective] Exploring the influence of shearing method on the residual strength of remolded loess in order to provide a scientific basis for the evaluation and treatment of loess landslide engineering.[Methods] To explore the influence of different shear modes on peak strength
residual strength and deformation
ring shear test was carried out on Jingyang loess by ring shear apparatus.[Results] The peak strength and residual strength of remolded loess increased with the increase of effective normal stress
and the greater the effective normal stress
the easier the loess to achieve the residual strength. The deformation of remolded loess is shown as shear compression. The average value of residual strength index obtained by single-stage shear and multistage shear was close.[Conclusion] The shear method is recommended for single-stage shear.
Skempton A W. Residual strength of clays in landslides, folded strata and the laboratory[J]. Geotechnique, 1985,35(1):3-18.
李凌芸,党进谦,王炜.泾阳黄土抗剪强度的环剪试验研究[J].西安理工大学学报,2015,31(1):113-119.
李晓,梁收运,郑国东.滑带土的研究进展[J].地球科学进展,2010,25(5):484-491.
Skempton A W. Long-term stability of clay slopes[J]. Geotechnique, 1964,14(2):157-168.
戴福初,王思敬,李焯芬.香港大屿山残坡积土的残余强度试验研究[J].工程地质学报,1998,6(3):32-38.
吴剑,冯夏庭.高速剪切条件下土的颗粒流模拟[J].岩石力学与工程学报,2008,27(S1):3064-3069.
高俊合,于海学,赵维炳.土与混凝土接触面特性的大型单剪试验研究及数值模拟[J].土木工程学报,2000,33(4):42-46.
谭文辉,任奋华,苗胜军.峰值强度与残余强度对边坡加固的影响研究[J].岩土力学,2007,28(S1):616-618.
李妥德,张颖均.1979.国内外滑坡土残余强度的研究现状(滑坡文集(二))[M].北京:中国铁道出版社,1979.
杨有莲,朱俊高,余挺,等.土与结构接触面力学特性环剪试验研究[J].岩土力学,2009,30(11):3257-3260.
American Society for Testing and Materials. Laboratoryshear Testing of Soils[C]//Philadelphia:Committee D-18 on Soils for Engineering Purposes,1964.
Sassa K, Fukuoka H, Wang G H, et al. Untrained dynamic-loading ring-shear apparatus and its application to landslide dynamics[J]. Landslides, 2004,1:7-19.
汪发武.高速滑坡形成机制:土粒子破碎导致超孔隙水压力的产生[J].长春科技大学学报,2001,31(1):64-69.
魏燕珍,邓辉,谢轲,等.滑坡堆积体粗粒滑带土强度参数确定方法研究[J].工程勘察,2013(6):23-27.
崔自治,朱楠,王晓芸.黄土自重湿陷性评价的理论与试验研究[J].兰州理工大学学报,2013,39(6):115-117.
王顺,项伟,崔德山,等.不同环剪方式下滑带土残余强度试验研究[J].岩土力学,2012,33(10):2967-2972.
吴迪,简文彬,徐超.残积土抗剪强度的环剪试验研究[J].岩土力学,2011,32(7):2045-2050.
陈传胜,张建敏,文仕知.基于有效垂直应力水平的滑带土强度参数适用性研究[J].岩石力学与工程学报,2011,30(8):1705-1711.
丁树云,毕庆涛,蔡正银,等.环剪仪的试验方法研究[J].岩土工程学报,2013,35(S2):197-201.
赵阳,周辉,冯夏庭,等.不同因素影响下层间错动带颗粒破碎和剪切强度特性试验研究[J].岩土力学,2013,34(1):13-21.
0
浏览量
1384
下载量
1
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010802024621