生产建设项目弃渣场安全选址方案研究

袁普金; 姚赫; 张勇; 高旭彪

doi:10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2018.06.020

您当前的位置：

首页 >

文章列表页 >

生产建设项目弃渣场安全选址方案研究

试验研究

- 生产建设项目弃渣场安全选址方案研究
- Investigation of Site Selection for Slag Abandonment Yard of Production and Construction Projects
- 水土保持通报 2018年38卷第6期页码：132-137
- 作者机构：
  
  1. 水利部水土保持监测中心,北京,100055
  2. 长江水利委员会长江流域水土保持监测中心站,湖北,武汉,430010
- 作者简介：
- 基金信息：
  
  国家自然科学基金项目“干湿交替作用下非均质土体的形变与破坏机制”（41807065）;水利部水土保持方案技术评审项目（12630005）
- DOI：10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2018.06.020
  中图分类号：
- 纸质出版：2018
- 稿件说明：
移动端阅览
袁普金, 姚赫, 张勇, 等. 生产建设项目弃渣场安全选址方案研究[J]. 水土保持通报, 2018,38(6):132-137.

YUAN Pujin, YAO He, ZHANG Yong, et al. Investigation of Site Selection for Slag Abandonment Yard of Production and Construction Projects[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2018, 38(6): 132-137.
袁普金, 姚赫, 张勇, 等. 生产建设项目弃渣场安全选址方案研究[J]. 水土保持通报, 2018,38(6):132-137. DOI： 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2018.06.020.

YUAN Pujin, YAO He, ZHANG Yong, et al. Investigation of Site Selection for Slag Abandonment Yard of Production and Construction Projects[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2018, 38(6): 132-137. DOI： 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2018.06.020.

摘要

[目的] 研究弃渣失稳后可能产生的滑移距离，为生产建设项目弃渣场安全选址提供参考依据。[方法] 收集了1 032组国内外堆积体、滑坡体、火山流体数据，整理出有效数据882组，在此基础上，基于发生类似运动的概率提出了历史发生频率选址法，基于理论修正模型提出了模型预测选址法。[结果] 根据历史发生频率法，对5，4，1级弃渣场宜分别取2.78，5.88，14.29倍落差的安全距离，对2级、3级弃渣场宜取7.14倍的落差的安全距离。利用模型预测法，根据不同的渣场大小等级（AL）和岩质类型（RT），可准确预测弃渣场选址的安全防护距离。[结论] 历史发生频率法操作较简单，容易推广和实施。模型法理论性强，判断较为准确，但需进行试算迭代，使用要求较高。

Abstract

[Objective] The possible mass movement distance resulted from the instability of the abandoned dreg sites was studied for life and property security and environmental protection.[Methods] In accordance with the summarized historical data about 1 032 samples from soil accumulation

landslide mass and volcanic fluids

882 effective data were selected by statistical analysis

and two models with regard to site selection were proposed.[Results] The corresponding safe distance for waste rock and soil accumulation in the different scales was calculated by the historical frequency. The 2.78

5.88 and 14.29 times of its distance corresponding to the waste rock and soil accumulation were suggested for 5

4 and 1 class abandoned dreg sites. And the 7.14 times of its distance corresponding to the waste rock and soil accumulation was suggested for 2 and 3 class abandoned dreg sites. The numerical prediction method with a highly application for loess accumulation was proposed to determine the safe distance by the theoretical modification and evaluation of the existed experience models

considering the mass scale

landform and rock classification.[Conclusion] The historical frequency method with a simple procedure can be widely used and accepted. The numerical prediction method has higher precision with iterative computation.

关键词

Keywords

references

Robin F, Jordi C, Christophe B, et al. Guidelines for landslide susceptibility, hazard and risk zoning for land use planning[J]. Engineering Geology, 2008,102(3/4):85-98.

Bobrowsky P, Highland L. The Landslide Handbook:A Guide to Understanding Landslides:A Landmark Publication for Landslide Education and Preparedness[M]//Landslides:Global Risk Preparedness. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2013.

Wise M, Moore G D, van Dine D F. Landslide risk case studies in forest development planning and operations[M]. British Columbia, Ministry of Forests, Forest Science Program, 2004.

Harp E L, Michael J A, Laprade W T, et al. Shallow landslide hazard map of Seattle, Washington[J]. Engineering geology and landslides of the Seattle, Washington, area:Geological Society of America reviews in engineering geology, 2008, 20:67-82.

Powell G. Landslide risk management concepts and guidelines[J].Australian Geomechanics, 2002,35(1):105-110.

张勇,姚赫,江宁,等.基于经验统计的弃渣场失稳致灾距预测模型研究[J].人民长江,2017,48(12):65-69.

陈晓东.单体边坡稳定分析与滑坡灾变强度预测[D].北京:清华大学,2007.

陈红旗,黄润秋,林峰.大型堆积体边坡的空间工程效应研究[J].岩土工程学报,2005,27(3):323-328.

王念秦,张倬元,王家鼎.一种典型黄土滑坡的滑距预测方法[J].西北大学学报:自然科学版, 2003,33(1):111-114.

杨长卫.岩质边坡的地震动特性及基覆型边坡的滑坡成因机理、稳定性判识、危害范围评价体系的研究[D].四川成都:西南交通大学, 2014.

Guo Deping, Hamada M, He Chuan, et al. An empirical model for landslide travel distance prediction in Wenchuan earthquake area[J]. Landslides, 2014,11(2):281-291.

Scheidegger A E. On the prediction of the reach and velocity of catastrophic landslides[J]. Rock Mechanics, 1973,5(4):231-236.

张振中.黄土地震灾害预测[M].北京:地震出版社,1999.

Zhang S, Zhang L M, Xiang B, et al. Travel Distances of Earthquake-induced Landslides[C]//Geo-Congress, 2013:991-1001.

Corominas J. The angle of reach as a mobility index for small and large landslides[J]. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 1996,33(2):260-271.

Inokuchi T. Properties of sector-collapse and debris avalanches on Quaternary volcanoes in Japan[J]. Journal of the Japan Landslide Society, 2006,42(5):409-420.

Kokusho T, Ishizawa T. Energy approach to earthquake-induced slope failures and its implications[J]. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 2007,133(7):828-840.

Kokusho T, Ishizawa T, Nishida K. Travel distance of failed slopes during 2004 Chuetsu earthquake and its evaluation in terms of energy[J]. Soil Dynamics & Earthquake Engineering, 2009,29(7):1159-1169.

Finlay P J, Mostyn G R, Fell R. Landslide risk assessment:prediction of travel distance[J]. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 1999,36(3):556-562.

Budetta P, Riso R D. The mobility of some debris flows in pyroclastic deposits of the northwestern Campanian region(southern Italy)[J]. Bulletin of Engineering Geology & the Environment, 2004,63(4):293-302.

Hunter G, Fell R. Travel distance angle for "rapid" landslides in constructed and natura[J]. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 2003,40(6):1123-1141.

Li Xiuzhen, Kong Jiming, Li Shengwei. Travel distance prediction of landslides triggered by the M8.0 Wenchuan earthquake[J]. Applied Mechanics & Materials, 2011,71/78:1736-1740.

Yang Changwei, Zhang Jianjing, Zhang Ming. A prediction model for horizontal run-out distance of landslides triggered by Wenchuan earthquake[J]. Earthquake Engineering & Engineering Vibration, 2013,12(2):201-208.

Chen Hongxin, Zhang Limin, Gao Liang, et al. Presenting regional shallow landslide movement on three-dimensional digital terrain[J]. Engineering Geology, 2015,195:122-134.

Hayashi J N, Self S. A comparison of pyroclastic flow and debris avalanche mobility[J]. Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres, 1992,97(97):9063-9071.

Evans S G, Clague J J, Woodsworth G J, et al. The Pandemonium creek rock avalanche, British Columbia[J]. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 1989,26(3):427-446.

浏览量

1059

下载量

CSCD

文章被引用时，请邮件提醒。

提交

工具集

关联资源

2024年宁夏极端暴雨事件引发的梯田侵蚀调查研究

不同水土保持耕作措施对黑土坡耕地产流产沙的影响机制

成渝地区双城经济圈生产建设活动水土保持监管试点研究

西北地区水库黄土库岸稳定分析

陕西省泾阳南塬崩塌、滑坡地质灾害及成因分析