1. 西北农林科技大学 林学院, 陕西 杨凌,712100
2. 西北农林科技大学 水土保持研究所, 陕西 杨凌,712100
3. 中国科学院 水利部 水土保持研究, 陕西 杨凌,712100
4. 西北大学 城市与环境学院,陕西,西安,710069
纸质出版:2018
移动端阅览
马亚亚, 王杰, 张超, 等. 基于CSLE模型的陕北纸坊沟流域土壤侵蚀评价[J]. 水土保持通报, 2018,38(6):95-102.
MA Yaya, WANG Jie, ZHANG Chao, et al. Evaluation of Soil Erosion Based on CSLE Model in Zhifanggou Watershed of Northern Shaanxi Province[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2018, 38(6): 95-102.
马亚亚, 王杰, 张超, 等. 基于CSLE模型的陕北纸坊沟流域土壤侵蚀评价[J]. 水土保持通报, 2018,38(6):95-102. DOI: 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2018.06.015.
MA Yaya, WANG Jie, ZHANG Chao, et al. Evaluation of Soil Erosion Based on CSLE Model in Zhifanggou Watershed of Northern Shaanxi Province[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2018, 38(6): 95-102. DOI: 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2018.06.015.
[目的] 对陕北纸坊沟流域土壤侵蚀状况进行评价,为该流域不合理土地利用方式的调整和优化以及水土流失治理措施的合理布设提供科学依据。[方法] 以陕西省安塞县纸坊沟流域为研究区,基于ArcGIS技术,利用2005—2016年纸坊沟流域水文站月降雨量数据、DEM数据、土壤类型数据和土地利用数据,率定中国土壤流失方程(CSLE)的相关参数,计算研究区的土壤侵蚀强度,对土地利用变化与坡度和土壤侵蚀强度之间的关系进行分析。[结果] ①研究区内不同坡度带上的土壤侵蚀强度差异较大,15°~25°左右的坡耕地是土壤侵蚀的敏感部位。②纸坊沟流域内土地以林地、耕地、草地为主,耕地面积不断减少,林地和草地面积不断增加。该区域实施退耕还林后,土壤侵蚀的面积与强度整体呈现改善趋势;土地利用变化与土壤侵蚀强度具有密切联系,表现为耕地的土壤侵蚀强度较强,林地和草地侵蚀强度相对较弱,说明增加林地和草地面积,减少耕地面积,能够显著减弱土壤侵蚀。[结论] 研究区内土壤侵蚀空间分布受土地利用方式和坡度制约,该区今后水土流失治理的重点区域是15°~25°左右的坡耕地。
[Objective] The soil erosion situation was evaluated in the Zhifanggou watershed of Northern Shaanxi Province in order to provides scientific basis and theoretical support for the adjustment and optimization of unreasonable land use patterns and the rational arrangement of soil and water conservation control measures in the watershed.[Methods] The present study amended the parameters of Chinese soil loss equation(CSLE) and calculated soil erosion intensity based on the data of monthly rainfall
DEM
soil type
and land use from 2005 to 2016 in the Zhifanggou watershed at Ansai County of Northern Shaanxi Province using ArcGIS. The linkages between land use change
slope degree and soil erosion intensity were also analyzed. Based on the aforementioned results
we put forward suggestions for the management of soil and water loss in this area.[Results] Soil erosion intensity differed greatly among different slope zones in the investigated area. Farmlands with 15°~25° slope in the watershed were sensitive to soil erosion. Forestland
farmland and grassland dominated the Zhifanggou watershed. The area of farmland decreased continuously and that of forestland and grassland increased gradually. Since the project of Grain for Green initiated
the area that subjected to soil erosion
and the erosion intensity were both decreased. There was a close association between land use change and soil erosion intensity
characterized by higher erosion intensity in farmland and lower density in forestland and grassland. These results indicated that increasing the forestland and grassland and decreasing the farmland could be favorable for the reduction of soil erosion.[Conclusion] Spatial distribution of soil erosion in the study area was dominantly determined by the land use types and slope degree. Soil and water loss management should focus on the slope land with degree of 15°~25°.
陈丽华,鲁绍伟,张学培,等.晋西黄土区主要造林树种林地土壤水分生态条件分析[J].水土保持研究,2008,15(1):394-397.
程琳,杨勤科,谢红霞,等.基于GIS和CSLE的陕西省土壤侵蚀定量评价方法研究[J].水土保持学报,2009,23(5):61-66.
蔡凌雁,汤国安,熊礼阳,等.基于DEM的陕北黄土高原典型地貌分形特征研究[J].水土保持通报,2014,34(3):141-144.
Wischmeier W H, Smith D D. Predicting Rainfall Erosion Losses:A Guide to Conservation Planning[M]. US Washington D C:Agriculture Handbook, 1978:537.
Renard K G, Ferreira V A. RUSLE model description and database sensitivity[J]. Journal of Environmental Quality, 1993,22(3):458-466.
江忠善,郑粉莉,武敏.中国坡面水蚀预报模型研究[J].泥沙研究,2005(4):1-6.
花利忠, 贺秀斌, 朱波. 川中丘陵区小流域土壤侵蚀空间分异评价研究[J]. 水土保持通报, 2007, 27(3):111-115.
Knisel W G. CREAMS:A Field Scale Model for Chemicals, Runoff, and Erosions from Agricultural Management Systems[R]. USDA Conservation Research Report No.26, US:US Department of Agriculture, 1980.
Flangan D C, Nearing M A. USDA Water Erosion Prediction Project:Hill Slope Profile and Watershed Model Documentation[R]. USA:USDA-ARS, NSERL, Report No10 USDA-ARS, West Lafayette, Indiana. 1995.
Misra R K, Rose C W. Application and sensitivity analysis of process-based erosion model-GUEST[J]. European Journal Soil Science, 2010, 47(4):593-604.
鲁克新.黄土高原流域生态环境修复中的水沙响应模拟研究[D].陕西西安:西安理工大学,2006.
刘宝元.西北黄土高原区土壤侵蚀预报模型开发项目研究成果报告[R].北京:水利部水土保持监测,2006.
Mccool D K, Brown L C, Foster G R, et al. Revised slope steepness factor for the universal soil loss equation[J]. Transactions of the ASAE-American Society of Agricultural Engineers(USA), 1987,30(5):1387-1396.
Zhang, Hongming, Yao Zhihong, Yang Qinke, et al. An integrated algorithm to evaluate flow direction and flow accumulation in flat regions of hydrologically corrected DEMs[J]. Catena, 2017(151):174-181.
Zhu Hanhua, Wu Jinshui, Guo Shengli, et al. Land use and topographic position control soil organic C and N accumulation in eroded hilly watershed of the Loess Plateau[J]. Catena, 2014, 120(1):64-72.
谢红霞.延河流域土壤侵蚀时空变化及水土保持环境效应评价研究[D].陕西西安:陕西师范大学,2008.
Liu Baoyuan, Nearing M A, Shi P J, et al. Slope length effects on soil loss for steep slopes[J]. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 1994,64(5):1759-1763.
张科利,彭文英,杨红丽.中国土壤可蚀性值及其估算[J].土壤学报,2007,44(1):7-13.
林慧龙,郑舒婷,王雪璐.基于RUSLE模型的三江源高寒草地土壤侵蚀评价[J].草业学报,2017,26(7):11-22.
中华人民共和国水利部.SL190-2007土壤侵蚀分类分级标准[M].北京:中国水利水电出版社,2008:3-12.
张岩,刘宝元,史培军,等.黄土高原土壤侵蚀作物覆盖因子计算[J].生态学报,2001,21(7):1050-1056.
怡凯,王诗阳,王雪,等.基于RUSLE模型的土壤侵蚀时空分异特征分析:以辽宁省朝阳市为例[J].地理科学,2015,35(3):365-372.
杨冉冉,徐涵秋,林娜,等.基于RUSLE的福建省长汀县河田盆地区土壤侵蚀定量研究[J].生态学报,2013,33(10):2974-2982.
冯强,赵文武. USLE/RUSLE中植被覆盖与管理因子研究进展[J].生态学报,2014,34(16):4461-4472.
陈思旭,杨小唤,肖林林,等.基于RUSLE模型的南方丘陵山区土壤侵蚀研究[J].资源科学,2014,36(6):1288-1297.
王锦志,刘林,王小平.3S技术在王家沟流域沟道侵蚀研究中的应用[J].山西水土保持科技,2017(3):9-12.
方广玲,香宝,赵卫,等.基于GIS和RUSLE的拉萨河流域土壤侵蚀研究[J].水土保持学报,2015,29(3):6-12.
王春梅,杨勤科,王琦,等.区域土壤侵蚀强度评价方法研究:以安塞县为例[J].中国水土保持科学,2010,8(3):1-7.
孟祥志,刘艇,王继红.我国黑土区水土流失研究综述[J].中国农村水利水电,2010(10):36-38.
李斌兵,郑粉莉,龙栋材,等.基于GIS纸坊沟小流域土壤侵蚀强度空间分布[J].地理科学,2009,29(1):105-110.
0
浏览量
1889
下载量
12
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010802024621