1. 新疆林业科学院,新疆,乌鲁木齐,830002
2. 长安大学 旱区地下水与生态效应教育部重点实验室,陕西,西安,710054
3. 长安大学 环境科学与工程学院,陕西,西安,710054
纸质出版:2018
移动端阅览
管文轲, 韦红, 钟家骅, 等. 技术塔里木河流域植被覆盖变化的遥感监测[J]. 水土保持通报, 2018,38(5):244-248.
GUAN Wenke, WEI Hong, ZHONG Jiahua, et al. Remote Sensing Monitoring of Vegetation Cover Change in Tarim River Basin[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2018, 38(5): 244-248.
管文轲, 韦红, 钟家骅, 等. 技术塔里木河流域植被覆盖变化的遥感监测[J]. 水土保持通报, 2018,38(5):244-248. DOI: 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2018.05.039.
GUAN Wenke, WEI Hong, ZHONG Jiahua, et al. Remote Sensing Monitoring of Vegetation Cover Change in Tarim River Basin[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2018, 38(5): 244-248. DOI: 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2018.05.039.
[目的]对塔里木河流域植被恢复成效及发展趋势进行定量分析,为流域生态治理提供基础研究依据。[方法]基于2007—2017年MODIS-MOD13 Q1多光谱遥感资料,以EVI (enhanced vegetation index)植被指数为切入点,综合运用ArcGIS等软件平台,沿塔里木河两岸设立监测区域并构建植被覆盖度时间序列模型,对塔里木河流域植被的变化规律进行动态监测及趋势分析。[结果]①塔里木河流域植被覆盖基数低,且不同河段植被状况差异大,2017年干流植被覆盖度最高仅为23.56%,上游段植被覆盖最高可达下游段的3.36倍,上游植被覆盖度年内极值比达4.28; ②2017年塔里木河流域全年植被覆盖水平相比2007年无显著差异,其未来的生态环境演变时间序列模型呈现出良性趋势; ③NDVI指数与EVI指数的监测结果无显著差异,但NDVI在高植被区易出现饱和现象,在低植被区容易偏低估计。[结论]塔里木河流域当前植被覆盖保持稳定,未来生态环境有好转趋势,基于EVI指数对植被恢复成效的动态监测与定量分析是可行的。
[Objective] To analyze the vegetation restoration effectiveness and development trends in the Tarim River basin in order to provide research basis for the ecological management of the basin.[Methods] Based on MODIS-MOD13 Q1 multi-spectral remote sensing data from 2007 to 2017
EVI (enhanced vegetation index) was used as a breakthrough point. ArcGIS software was used and time series models of vegetation cover were constructed to dynamically monitor the vegetation changes in the Tarim River basin.[Results] ①The vegetation coverage of Tarim River basin was low
and the spatial-temporal heterogeneity of vegetation index was large. The highest vegetation cover in the main steam was only 23.56% in July
2017
while the highest vegetation coverage in the upstream was 3.36 times of that of the downstream section
and the annual maximum ratio of the vegetation coverage in the upper reaches was 4.28. ②There was no significant difference in vegetation coverage between 2017 and 2007 in the whole basin. Time series model showed a positive trend for the future vegetation restoration of the Tarim River. ③There was no significant difference between NDVI and EVI
but NDVI tended to be low in areas with low vegetation coverage
while it tended to be high in areas with high vegetation coverage.[Conclusion] The vegetation coverage of the Tarim River basin remains stable currently. Moreover
the ecological environment will be improved in the future. Dynamic monitoring and quantitative analysis of vegetation restoration effectiveness based on EVI index is feasible.
黄强,徐海量,张胜江,等.塔里木内陆河流域水资源合理配置[M].北京:科学出版社,2015:1-63.
阿布都沙拉木·加拉力丁,克力木·买买提,海米提·依米提.塔里木河流域胡杨保护区土地覆盖变化研究[J].干旱区资源与环境,2010,24(1):154-157.
Munkhnasan L, Lee Jongyeol, Lee Wookyun, et a1. Assessment of land cover change and desertification using remote sensing technology in a local region of Mongolia[J]. Advances in space research, 2016,57(1):64-77.
Martínez B, Gilabert M A. Vegetation dynamics from NDVI time series analysis using the wavelet transform[J]. Remote Sensing of Environment, 2009,113(9):1823-1842.
Tong Xiaoye, Bartin M, Hiernaux P, et al. Revisiting the coupling between NDVI trends and cropland changes in the Sahel drylands:A case study in western Niger[J]. Remote Sensing of Environment, 2017, 191(3):286-296.
Detsch F, Otte I, Appelhans T, et al. Seasonal and long-term vegetation dynamics from 1-km GIMMS-based NDVI time series at Mt. Kilimanjaro, Tanzania[J]. Remote Sensing of Environment, 2016,178(6):70-83.
Huo Aidi, Zhang Jia, Cheng Yuxiang, et al. Assessing the effect of scaling methods on retrieval of soil moisture based on MODIS images in arid regions[J]. Toxicological & Environmental Chemistry Reviews, 2016,98(3-4):410-418.
Weiss E, Marsh S E, Pfirman E S. Application of NOAA-AVHRR NDVI time series data to assess changes in Saudi Arabia's rangelands[J]. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 2001,22(6):1005-1027.
霍艾迪,康相武,王国梁,等.基于MODIS的沙漠化地区植被覆盖度提取模型的研究[J].干旱地区农业研究,2008,26(6):217-223.
Huo Aidi, Li Jianguo, Jiang Guang Zhi, et al. Temporal and spatial variation of surface evapotranspiration based on remote sensing in Golmud region, China[J]. Applied Mathematics & Information Sciences, 2013,7(2L):519-524.
王正兴,刘闯, HUETE Alfredo.植被指数研究进展:从AVHRR-NDVI到MODIS-EVI[J].生态学报,2003,23(5):979-987.
李红军,郑力,雷玉平,等.基于EOS/MODIS数据的NDVI与EVI比较研究[J].地理科学进展,2007,26(1):26-32.
左丽君,张增祥,董婷婷,等. MODIS/NDVI和MODIS/EVI在耕地信息提取中的应用及对比分析[J].农业工程学报,2008,24(3):167-172.
李喆,胡蝶,赵登忠,等.宽波段遥感植被指数研究进展综述[J].长江科学院院报,2015,32(1):125-130.
朱林富,谢世友,杨华,等.基于MODIS EVI的重庆植被覆盖变化的地形效应[J].自然资源学报,2017,32(12):2023-2033.
杨强,王婷婷,陈昊,等.基于MODIS EVI数据的锡林郭勒盟植被覆盖度变化特征[J].农业工程学报,2015,31(22):191-197.
刘娇,黄显峰,方国华,等.基于GIS缓冲区功能的塔里木河中游植被指数时空变化分析[J].干旱区研究,2018,35(1):171-180.
王静,郭铌. Terra MODIS和Aqua MODIS单波段反射率及植被指数初步比较[J].生态学杂志,2008,27(10):1711-1717.
Huo Aidi, Chen Xunhong, Li Huike, et al. Development and testing of a remote sensing-basedmodel for estimating groundwater levels in aeolian desert areas of China[J]. Canadian Journal of Soil Science, 2015, 91(1):29-37.
吕志强.遥感与GIS应用实习教程[M].成都:西南财经大学出版社,2016:216-289.
买尔燕古丽·阿不都热合曼,艾里西尔·库尔班,阿迪力·阿不来提,等.塔里木河下游胡杨物候特征观测[J].干旱区研究,2008,25(4):525-529.
高永,崔向新,李丽红,等.荒漠化监测[M].北京:气象出版社,2013:24-113.
张沛,徐海量,杜清,等.基于RS和GIS的塔里木河干流生态环境状况评价[J].干旱区研究,2017,34(2):416-421.
0
浏览量
945
下载量
6
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010802024621