山东曲阜师范大学 地理与旅游学院,山东,日照,276826
纸质出版:2018
移动端阅览
刘守珍, 李俊莉. 区域科技创新与可持续发展空间差异研究——以山东省国家可持续发展实验区为例[J]. 水土保持通报, 2018,38(4):259-265.
LIU Shouzhen, LI Junli. Regional Spatial Differences of Scientific-technical Innovation and Sustainable Development-A Case Study of CNSCs in Shandong Province[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2018, 38(4): 259-265.
刘守珍, 李俊莉. 区域科技创新与可持续发展空间差异研究——以山东省国家可持续发展实验区为例[J]. 水土保持通报, 2018,38(4):259-265. DOI: 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2018.04.042.
LIU Shouzhen, LI Junli. Regional Spatial Differences of Scientific-technical Innovation and Sustainable Development-A Case Study of CNSCs in Shandong Province[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2018, 38(4): 259-265. DOI: 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2018.04.042.
[目的]探讨不同区域实验区科技创新与可持续发展关联性的空间差异,为山东省可持续发展提供决策参考。[方法]从科技创新与可持续发展层面选取29个指标,运用灰色关联模型计算出2009—2015年鲁东、鲁中、鲁西实验区总体的科技创新与可持续发展度及协调度关联度,2015年各实验区科技创新与子系统发展度、可持续发展度及协调度关联系数,并进行分类。[结果]三大区域实验区科技创新与可持续发展度关联度较高,呈现自西向东阶梯式分布,与协调度关联度相对较低,呈现“中间高两头低”的格局;各实验区关联性显著,科技创新在推动经济、社会、环境协调可持续发展方面做出重大贡献,但不同区域科技支撑侧重领域不同;各实验区科技创新与可持续发展度、协调度关联系数差异明显。鲁东以中、高关联型为主,鲁中以高关联型为主,鲁西为高关联型。[结论]实验区科技创新与可持续发展关联性的空间差异较大,需因地制宜探索适合该区域发展的模式。
[Objective] To explore the spatial differences about relevance between scientific-technical innovation and sustainable development of China National Sustainable Communities(CNSCs) in different regions
and to provide decision reference for sustainable development of Shandong Province.[Methods] By selecting 29 index from two aspects of scientific-technical innovation and sustainable development
using grey correlation model calculated the correlation degree of scientific-technical innovation with sustainable development degree and coordination degree of CNSCs in eastern
central and western of Shandong Province in 2009-2015
calculated and classified correlation coefficient of scientific-technical innovation with subsystem development degree
sustainable development degree and coordination degree of every CNSCs in 2015.[Results] There was a high relevance between scientific-technical innovation and sustainable development degree in CNSCs of three region
showed the ladder distribution from west to east. A low relevance between scientific-technical innovation and coordination degree
showed the pattern of "high in the middle and low in the two ends"; There had a significant relevance of every CNSCs
and scientific-technical innovation made contributions to the promotions of economy
society and environment coordinated and sustainable development
but it focused on different aspects. The differences of correlation coefficient is obvious between scientific-technical innovation with sustainable development degree and coordination degree
the east is mainly moderate correlation type and high correlation type
the center is mainly high correlation type
the west belongs to high correlation type.[Conclusion] There was great difference in the spatial differences about relevance between scientific-technical innovation and sustainable development of CNSCs
and it was necessary to explore path which suits for local conditions.
白春礼.坚持科技创新促进可持续发展[J].中国科学院院刊,2012,27(3):259-267.
Valdas Samonis.Sustaining innovation:Theory and policies for New Europe[J]. Ekonomika,2004,8:68-69.
Hellström T. Dimensions of environmentally sustainable innovation:The structure of eco-innovation concepts[J]. Sustainable Development, 2007,15(3):148-159.
Zweimuller, J. Schumpeterian entrepreneurs meet engel's law:The impact of inequality on innovation-driven growth[J]. Journal of Economic Growth, 2000,5(2):185-206.
杨武,杨淼.基于科技创新驱动的我国经济发展与结构优化测度研究[J].软科学,2016,30(4):1-7.
程萍.建立推动可持续发展的"可持续科技创新"评价体系构想[J].武汉大学学报:社会科学版,2003,56(3):307-312.
杨武,杨淼.中国科技创新与经济发展耦合协调度模型[J].中国科技论坛,2016(3):30-35.
黄娟,汪明进.科技创新、产业集聚与环境污染[J].山西财经大学学报,2016,38(4):50-61.
董仁才,张娜娜,李思远,等.四个可持续发展实验区绿地系统可达性比较研究[J].生态学报,2017,37(10):3257-3263.
李俊莉,曹明明.国家可持续发展实验区发展水平的比较研究[J].水土保持通报,2011,31(6):160-164.
车晓翠,郭聃,李春丽.吉林省可持续发展实验区发展水平综合评价[J].科技视界,2016(4):85-86.
徐俊.县域国家可持续发展实验区协调性的实证研究[J].中国软科学,2008(9):90-93.
唐建设.安徽省可持续发展实验区建设分类评价研究[J].安徽农业大学学报,2014,23(1):38-41.
牟芳华.山东省经济区域划分及区域经济差距的测度分析[J].山东社会科学,2006(7):119-123.
任建兰.山东省可持续发展战略[M].山东济南:山东人民出版社,2013.
程萍.科技创新与可持续发展关系研究[D].江苏南京:河海大学,2001.
孟庆国,张玉新,侯世昌,等.可持续发展问题的技术根源与创新抉择[J].中国人口·资源与环境,2001,11(2):18-21.
科学技术部社会发展科技司,中国21世纪议程管理中心.国家可持续发展实验区报告(1986-2006)[M].北京:社会科学文献出版社,2007.
程启月.评测指标权重确定的结构熵权法[J].系统工程理论与实践,2010,30(7):1225-1228.
周利军,张淑花.基于熵权法的农业可持续发展评价:以绥化市为例[J].资源开发与市场,2008,24(11):982-984.
张卫民.基于熵值法的城市可持续发展评价模型[J].厦门大学学报,2004(2):110-116.
孙晓东,焦玥,胡劲松.基于灰色关联度和理想解法的决策方法研究[J].中国管理科学,2005,13(4):63-68.
李俊莉,丁桂英.日照国家可持续发展实验区发展状态评估研究[J].生态经济,2016,32(12):83-86.
于文良,王伯铎,吴良兴.陕西省可持续发展能力变化趋势和影响因素分析[J].干旱区资源与环境,2009,23(6):13-18.
宫继萍,潘竟虎,石培基.基于生态足迹和灰色关联度的甘肃省可持续发展研究[J].水土保持研究2011,18(2):198-201.
0
浏览量
975
下载量
2
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010802024621