1. 西安理工大学 省部共建西北旱区生态水利国家重点实验室,陕西,西安,710048
2. 中国科学院 水利部 水土保持研究所 黄土高原土壤侵蚀与旱地农业国家重点实验室, 陕西 杨凌,712100
3. 中国水利水电科学研究院 流域水循环模拟与调控国家重点实验室,北京,100048
纸质出版:2018
移动端阅览
于坤霞, 刘昱, 李鹏, 等. 开发建设项目生态修复环境效益评价[J]. 水土保持通报, 2018,38(4):155-161.
YU Kunxia, LIU Yu, LI Peng, et al. Environmental Benefits Evaluation of Ecological Restoration in Construction Projects[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2018, 38(4): 155-161.
于坤霞, 刘昱, 李鹏, 等. 开发建设项目生态修复环境效益评价[J]. 水土保持通报, 2018,38(4):155-161. DOI: 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2018.04.026.
YU Kunxia, LIU Yu, LI Peng, et al. Environmental Benefits Evaluation of Ecological Restoration in Construction Projects[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2018, 38(4): 155-161. DOI: 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2018.04.026.
[目的]近年来煤炭等开发建设项目引起的环境问题日渐成为全社会关注的焦点,评价生产建设项目生态修复效益,量化生产建设项目水土保持生态工程的效果,旨在为今后开发建设项目评价提供可参考的技术与经验。[方法]以陕西省子长县永兴煤矿资源整合项目为例,建立开发建设项目水土保持生态修复效益评价体系,计算了各评价指标在不同建设时期的隶属度值,分别采用主成分分析法和层次分析法计算指标权重,并根据拉格朗日乘子法对指标权重进行了综合,最后采用生态效益指数对开发建设项目生态修复环境效益进行综合评价。[结果]考虑了主客观信息在内的拉格朗日乘子法计算得到的综合权重能够反映出开发建设项目各建设时期不同指标的特点;基于综合权重计算得到的生态效益指数显示该项目在建设前期生态效益指数最高,而试运行期的生态效益指数0.392高于施工期0.318,表明生态修复工程在试运行期开始发挥了水土保持效益。[结论]提出的生态修复效益评价体系及方法可行,可以为其他生产建设类项目生态效益评价提供一定的参考。
[Objective] In recent years
environmental problems caused by coal and other construction projects have become the focus of the whole society
while evaluating the benefit of ecological restoration in construction projects and quantifying the effect of soil and water conservation in the construction projects can provide reference for the construction project evaluation in the future.[Methods] Taking resource integration project at Yongxing coal mine in Zichang County
Shaanxi Province as an example
the benefit evaluation system of soil and water conservation and ecological restoration for construction projects has been established
the values of different evaluation indexes in different construction periods have been scaled
the weights of the indexes which are calculated by the principal component analysis and the analytic hierarchy process method have been synthesized according to the Lagrange multiplier method
and the benefit index is finally used to make a comprehensive analysis of the environmental benefits of ecological restoration.[Results] The comprehensive weight calculated by the Lagrange multiplier method
which considers the subjective and objective information
can reflect the characteristics of the different indexes in the construction projects during each construction period. The ecological benefit index based on the comprehensive weight calculation shows that the ecological benefits index of this project in the early stage is the highest
while the ecological benefit index of the trial operation period is 0.392
which is higher than the construction period 0.318. The ecological restoration project began to play the role of soil and water conservation in the trial operation period.[Conclusion] The evaluation system and evaluation method of ecological restoration benefit proposed in this paper are feasible
which can provide a certain reference for other production and construction projects.
王伟.矿山生态环境保护与恢复治理评价指标体系的研究[D].广东广州:中山大学,2014.
张龙,汤崇军,喻荣岗.生态修复工程效益监测与评价研究[J].绿色科技, 2013(09):23-24.
郭晨晓,范舒欣,李晓鹏,等.基于AHP的城市园林植物群落生态效益评价方法[J].山东农林大学学报.2015,46(6):941-946.
潘叶,张燕.矿山废弃地生态修复效益评价研究:以南京幕府山为例[J].中国水土保持,2016(5):61-65.
刘瑞禄,周国富,龙成昌.赤水市水土保持生态修复工程生态效益评价研究[J].水土保持通报,2005,25(6):82-86.
陈梓玄,李占斌,李鹏.陕北府谷新田煤矿开发建设项目生态修复效益动态评价[J].水土保持研究,2011,18(2):21-25.
金一鸣.矿山废弃地工程绿化技术模式生态修复效益研究[D].北京:北京林业大学,2015.
李春平,杨益民,葛莹玉.主成分分析法和层次分析法在对综合指标进行定量评价中的比较[J].南京财经大学学报,2005(6):54-57.
朱雪龙.应用信息论基础[M].北京:清华大学出版社,2001.
刘冀,王本德.基于组合权重的模糊可变模型及在防洪风险评价中应用[J].大连理工大学学报,2009,49(2):272-275.
魏焕成.陕北地区煤炭开发生态环境问题研究[J].中国煤炭,2007,33(1):24-25.
郭静.开发建设项目水土保持监测与评价研究[D].山东泰安:山东农业大学,2008(2):88.
沈慧,姜凤岐.水土保持林效益评价研究综述[J].应用生态学报,1999,10(4):492-496.
向欣,罗煜,程红胜,等.基于层次分析法和模糊综合评价的沼气工程技术筛选[J].农业工程学报,2014,30(18):205-212.
Safari M, Ataei M, Khalokakaie R, et al. Mineral processing plant location using the analytic hierarchy process-a case study:The Sangan iron ore mine(phase 1)[J].Mining Science and Technology, 2010,20(5):691-695.
孙健,魏丽英.基于均值化主成分分析的交通安全评价方法研究[J].交通信息与安全,2012,30(1):90-93.
0
浏览量
893
下载量
0
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010802024621