河北农业大学 林学院,河北,保定,071000
纸质出版:2018
移动端阅览
牛庆花, 彭博, 陆贵巧, 等. 河北省坝上地区牧场防护林的防风效能研究[J]. 水土保持通报, 2018,38(4):114-117.
NIU Qinghua, PENG Bo, LU Guiqiao, et al. Windbreak Efficiency of Pasture Shelterbelt in Bashang Area of Hebei Province[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2018, 38(4): 114-117.
牛庆花, 彭博, 陆贵巧, 等. 河北省坝上地区牧场防护林的防风效能研究[J]. 水土保持通报, 2018,38(4):114-117. DOI: 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2018.04.019.
NIU Qinghua, PENG Bo, LU Guiqiao, et al. Windbreak Efficiency of Pasture Shelterbelt in Bashang Area of Hebei Province[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2018, 38(4): 114-117. DOI: 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2018.04.019.
[目的]揭示河北省坝上地区御道口牧场防护林林带的防风效能,为牧场防护林建设提供理论依据。[方法]以樟子松防护林林带为研究对象,运用空间多点观测法观测。[结果]当旷野风速为3.84 m/s时,在林后1(H为林带平均高度) H处,风速最小,同时防风效能最大,但随着水平距离的增加风速在逐渐升高而防风效能呈逐渐下降趋势。旷野风速越大,林带防风效能增大,有效防护距离变大。当旷野风速为5~6级时,在林内,1 H,5 H处的防风效能最好,防风效能范围为67.97%~94.27%。不同垂直高度上防风效能的变化趋势由大到小为:30,50,150,300 cm,风速的分布规律变化趋势与防风效能正好相反,由大到小为:300,150,50,30 cm。[结论]牧场防护林林带后的1~10 H区域是林带的最佳保护区和作用范围,其中林后1 H的防风效能最好,但会随着风速和垂直高度的变化而有一定的差异。
[Objective] Studying the windbreak efficiency of shelterbelt in Yudaokou pasture in Bashang Area of Hebei Province to provide a theoretical basis for the construction of pasture shelterbelt.[Methods] Taking The Pinus sylvestris shelterbelt as the research object
the spatial multi-point observation method was applied.[Results] When the desert wind speed was 3.84 m/s
the wind speed was the smallest at 1 H(H stands for the average hight of the forest shelterbelt) after the forest
and the wind efficiency was the most
but with the increase of the horizontal distance
the wind speed was gradually increased and the wind efficiency gradually decreased. The greater of the desert wind speed
the higher of the windbreak efficiency
and the larger of the effective protection distance. When the wind speed level in the open field was 5~6
in the forest
1 H and 5 H of the wind protection efficiency were the best
and the wind efficiency range was 67.97%~94.27%. Windbreak efficiency at diffent vertical heights ranked:30
50
150 and 300 cm
and the rank of wind speed distribution was opposite to that of windbreak.[Conclusion] After the pasture shelterbelt of the 1 H to 10 H area is the best protection area and the action scope of the forest belt. The windbreak efficiency of the post forest 1 H is best
but it will vary with the change of wind speed and vertical height.
王岩,魏忠平,潘文利,等.辽河三角洲泥质海岸防护林小气候效益研究[J].水土保持研究,2011,18(4):65-68,73.
刘骄,黄义雄,叶功富,等.福建沿海主要防护林树种的生物量、凋落物及其对林下土壤养分的影响[J].水土保持研究,2011,18(1):146-152.
贾顺儒.农田防护林效应的分析[J].甘肃农业,2005(5):28.
朱廷曜,关德新,等.农田防护林生态工程学[M].北京:中国林业出版社,2000.
李锋瑞,张华,赵丽娅,等.科尔沁沙地人工杨树林生态防风效应研究[J].水土保持学报,2003,17(2):62-66.
吕仁猛,丁国栋,郝玉光,等.旷野风速对林网内风速分布及防风效能的影响[J].水土保持通报,2014,34(2):105-110.
付亚星,王乐,彭帅,等.河北坝上农田防护林防风效能及类型配置研究:以河北省康保县为例[J].水土保持研究,2014,21(3):279-283.
曹孙新.农田防护林学[M].北京:中国林业出版,1983:103-104.
关文彬,李春平,李世锋,等.林带疏透度数字化测度方法的改进及其应用研究[J].应用生态学报,2002,13(6):651-657.
万猛,潘存德,王梅,等.农田防护林林带疏透度数字化测定方法及其应用[J].干旱区地理,2005,28(1):120-123.
张劲松,孟平,宋兆民,等.我国平原农区复合农林业小气候效应研究概述[J].中国农业气象,2004,25(3):52-55,62.
张付民,郭洪敬,戴万德.农田林网防风效应的观测研究[J].山东气象,1993(3):23-27.
董慧龙,杨文斌,王林和,等.单一行带式乔木固沙林内风速流场和防风效果风洞试验[J].干旱区资源与环境,2009,23(7):110-116.
高海楼.河北坝上农田防护林防风效能及其空间分布研究[D].河北石家庄:河北师范大学,2012.
杜鹤强,韩致文,颜长珍,等.西北防护林防风效应研究[J].水土保持通报,2010,30(1):117-120.
0
浏览量
922
下载量
4
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010802024621