1. 中国科学院 南京地理与湖泊研究所 流域地理学重点实验室,江苏,南京,210008
2. 江苏省水文水资源勘测局苏州分局,江苏,苏州,215006
3. 南京农业大学 土地管理学院,江苏,南京,210095
纸质出版:2018
移动端阅览
吕文, 杨桂山, 万荣荣, 等. 太湖流域典型土地利用类型生态耗水分量的比较研究[J]. 水土保持通报, 2018,38(4):103-108.
Comparison of Ecological Water Consumption's Components of Typical Land Use Types in Taihu Lake Basin[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2018, 38(4): 103-108.
吕文, 杨桂山, 万荣荣, 等. 太湖流域典型土地利用类型生态耗水分量的比较研究[J]. 水土保持通报, 2018,38(4):103-108. DOI: 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2018.04.017.
Comparison of Ecological Water Consumption's Components of Typical Land Use Types in Taihu Lake Basin[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2018, 38(4): 103-108. DOI: 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2018.04.017.
[目的]对太湖流域典型土地利用类型的生态耗水分量进行比较研究,为优化土地利用结构、提高流域生态系统水量调节能力提供理论基础。[方法]应用田块尺度土壤—水—大气—植物模型(SWAP),在太湖流域水汽通量监测试验基础上对林地、茶园和耕地的生态耗水进行数值模拟。[结果]①林地蒸腾量占据耗水量的87.80%,在林地生态系统调节水量过程中起着重要作用,生态耗水呈以8月为峰值的单峰曲线; ②茶园茶株蒸腾和株间蒸发占据耗水的94.86%,两者比值大约为3∶1,茶株的人工修剪对各分量的年内变化有影响; ③耕地作物蒸腾和棵间蒸发占据了耗水量的94.73%,两者比值约2∶1,并呈现麦季(1—5月)和稻季(6—11月)2个时段特征; ④流域竹林枯枝落叶层厚,树林冠层厚实,园地茶株由于修剪后枝叶还未恢复,耕地小麦和水稻作物有生长初始阶段,所以林地相比园地和耕地土壤蒸发偏低。[结论]3种不同土地利用类型的植被在不同生长阶段的叶面积指数、人工修剪作用对耗水量年内变化可能也会产生一定的影响。
[Objective] Comparative study on ecological water consumption of typical land use types in Taihu Lake basin was conducted
in order to provide a theoretical basis for optimizing land use structure and improving water regulation capacity of the watershed ecosystem.[Methods] Based on water flux monitoring points
a field scale model
soil-water-atmosphere-plant model(SWAP)
was applied to simulate the ecological water consumptions in forest land
tea garden and cultivated land.[Results] ① Ecological water consumption in the forest land showed a single peak from June to August
in which tree's transpiration contributed 87.80% of it
hence it played an important role in regulating the amount of water. ② Ecological water consumption in tea garden changed relatively in a flat mode during the year
tea plant transpiration(69.17%) and soil evaporation(25.69%) accounted for the majority of the water consumption together. ③ Yearly change of ecological water consumption in cultivated land had two obvious different periods
corresponding to wheat season(January to May) and rice growing season(June to November)
respectively. Annual transpiration of cultivated land(61.28%) and the evaporation(33.45%) accounted for 94.73% of the water consumption. ④ The evaporation of forest land was relatively smaller than those of garden and cultivated land. This can ascribed as the following reasons:litter layer and canopy were thick in forest
whereas branch leaves did not recover in tea garden
and crops were at the stages of initial growth.[Conclusion] Annual variance of ecological water consumption was mainly affected by rainfall and temperature
but growth period of crops and tea pruning may also have their impacts on ecological water consumption.
Rosenberg N J, Blad B L, Verma S B. Microclimate-the Biological environment of plants[M]. New York:John Wiley & Sons, 1983.
Eagleson P S. Ecohydrology[M]. UK:Cambridge University, 2002.
高俊峰,闻余华.太湖流域土地利用变化对流域产水量的影响[J].地理学报,2002,57(2):194-200.
万荣荣,杨桂山,李恒鹏.流域土地利用/覆被变化的洪水响应:以太湖上游西苕溪流域为例[J].自然灾害学报,2008,17(3):10-15.
Law B E, Ryan M G, Anthoni P M. Seasonal and annual respiration of a ponderosa pine ecosystem[J]. Global Change Biology, 1999,5(2):169-182.
吕文,杨桂山,万荣荣,等.太湖流域西部丘陵茶园修剪前后蒸散速率的比较分析[J].中国生态农业学报,2013,21(2):184-191.
袁凤辉,关德新,吴家兵,等.箱式气体交换观测系统及其在植物生态系统气体交换研究中的应用[J].应用生态学报,2009,20(6):1495-1504.
Kroes J G, Van Dam J C, Groenendijk P, et al. SWAP version3.2.:Theory description and user manual[M]. Wageningen:Alterra, 2008.
康绍忠,熊运章.干旱缺水条件下麦田蒸散量计算方法的研究[J].地理学报,1991,45(4):475-483.
陈三雄.浙江安吉主要植被类型土壤水土保持功能研究[D].江苏南京:南京林业大学,2006.
徐秋芳,徐建明,刘力,等.安吉县港口乡低产毛竹林地肥力分析[J].浙江林学院学报,2000,17(3):280-284.
张燕,杨浩,金峰,等.宜兴茶园土壤侵蚀及生态影响[J].土壤学报,2003,40(6):815-821.
陈仁升,康尔泗,吕世华,等.内陆河高寒山区流域分布式水热耦合模型:地面资料驱动结果[J].地球科学进展,2006,21(8):819-829.
刘晨峰,张志强,孙阁,等.基于涡度相关法和树干液流发评价杨树人工林生态系统蒸发散及其环境响应[J].植物生态学报,2009,33(4):706-718.
田风霞,赵传燕,冯兆东.祁连山区青海云杉林蒸腾耗水估算[J].生态学报,2011,31(9):2383-2391.
杨立文,石清峰.太行山主要植被枯枝落叶层的森林水文作用[J].林业科学研究,1998,10(3):283-288.
孟平.苹果蒸腾耗水特征及水分胁迫诊断预报模型研究[D].湖南长沙:中南林学院,2005.
杨帆,张万军.太行山低山区不同植被群落蒸发蒸腾研究[J].中国生态农业学报,2008,16(1):30-34.
郭瑞萍,莫兴国.森林、草地和农田典型植被蒸散量的差异[J].应用生态学报,2007,18(8):1751-1757.
刘昌明,张喜英,由懋正.大型蒸渗仪与小型棵间蒸发器结合测定冬小麦蒸散的研究[J].水利学报,1998(10):36-39.
莫兴国,刘苏峡,于沪宁,等.冬小麦能量平衡及蒸散分配的季节变化分析[J].地理学报,1997,52(6):636-542.
张仁华,孙晓敏,刘纪元,等.定量遥感反演作物蒸腾和土壤水分利用率的区域分异[J].中国科学(D辑):地球科学,2001,31(11):959-958.
0
浏览量
912
下载量
1
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010802024621