中国科学院 水利部 成都山地灾害与环境研究所, 山地灾害与地表过程重点实验室,四川,成都,610041
纸质出版:2018
移动端阅览
董一帆, 聂勇, 熊东红. 基于Google Earth影像的横断山区沟蚀及侵蚀沟类型调查研究[J]. 水土保持通报, 2018,38(3):151-157.
DONG Yifan, NIE Yong, XIONG Donghong. Investigation of Gully Density and Classification of Hengduan Mountainous Area Based on Google Earth Images[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2018, 38(3): 151-157.
董一帆, 聂勇, 熊东红. 基于Google Earth影像的横断山区沟蚀及侵蚀沟类型调查研究[J]. 水土保持通报, 2018,38(3):151-157. DOI: 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2018.03.024.
DONG Yifan, NIE Yong, XIONG Donghong. Investigation of Gully Density and Classification of Hengduan Mountainous Area Based on Google Earth Images[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2018, 38(3): 151-157. DOI: 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2018.03.024.
[目的
]
探讨横断山区侵蚀沟的类型、分布特征及影响因素,为研究沟蚀对横断山区土壤侵蚀及土地退化的影响提供依据。[方法
]
基于Google Earth高清影像结合GIS的方法,基于可见性的基本原则,对横断山区开展侵蚀沟的抽样调查。共布设调查单元2 242个,每个单元尺寸1 km×1 km。[结果
]
共有571个调查单元发现有侵蚀沟分布,占调查单元总数的25.5%,平均沟壑密度为2.20 km/km
2
。沟蚀在海拔低于
<
1 500 m的区域发育显著,沟壑密度随坡度增加而增长,与年降雨相关性较弱。草地是沟蚀发育的主要土地利用类型,燥红土的沟蚀分布率及平均沟壑密度显著高于其他土壤类型。通过总结国内外现有的侵蚀沟分类体系及其异同,结合调查结果,判定该次调查的横断山区侵蚀沟类型主要为切沟和冲沟(包括有泥石流事件的冲沟)。[结论
]
横断山区切沟和冲沟分布广泛,发育强烈,其分布受海拔、坡度、土地利用及土壤类型等因素的影响较为显著。
[Objective] To explore the classification
distribution and influencing factors of gullies in Hengduan Mountainous area
in order to provide a basis for the study of influences of gully erosion on soil erosion and land degradation processes in this area.[Methods] The high-resolution images available on Google Earth combined with GIS software were applied to investigate the gully density in Hengduan mountainous area according to the visibility principle. Totally
2 242 quadrats with the same size of 1 km×1 km were set randomly in the region.[Results] The gullies were observed in 571 quadrats
which accounted for 25.5% of the total quadrats
and the average density was 2.20 km/km2. Gully erosion was intensive at the low mountain regions(elevation<1 500 m)
and the gully density increased with the increasing slope gradient. The relationship between gully density and annual precipitation was quite weak. Grassland was the main land use type for gully development
and gully erosion in the dry red soil region was more intensive than other soil species. According to the domestic and international gully classification systems
the gullies observed in this study were mainly classified as permanent gully (including gullies with debris flow events).[Conclusion] The permanent gullies were widely distributed and intensively developed in Hengduan Mountainous area
which were clearly influenced by elevation
slope
land use and soil species.
Poesen J, Nachtergaele J, Verstraeten G, et al. Gully erosion and environmental change:importance and research needs[J]. Catena, 2003,50:91-133.
郑粉莉,徐锡蒙,覃超.沟蚀过程研究进展[J].农业机械学报,2016,47(8):48-59.
刘元保,朱显谟,周佩华,等.黄土高原坡面沟蚀的类型及其发生发展规律[J].中国科学院西北水土保持研究所集刊,1988,7:9-18.
伍永秋,刘宝元.切沟、切沟侵蚀与预报[J].应用基础与工程科学学报,2000,8(2):134-142.
朱显谟.黄土区土壤侵蚀的分类[J].土壤学报,1956,4(2):99-115.
罗来兴.划分晋西、陕北、陇东黄土区沟间地与沟谷的地貌类型[J].地理学报,1956,22(3):201-222.
Bocco G. Gully erosion:processes and models[J]. Progress in Physical Geography, 1991,15(4):392-406.
王兆印, Lee J, Melching C. 河流动力学与河流综合管理[M].北京:清华大学出版社,2014.
李宗省,何元庆,辛惠娟,等.我国横断山区1960-2008年气温和降水时空变化特征[J].地理学报,2010,65(5):563-579.
李炳元.横断山区地貌区划[J].山地研究,1989,7(1):13-20.
Vanmaercke M, Poesen J, Van Mele B, et al. How fast do gully headcuts retreat?[J]. Earth-Science Reviews, 2016,154:336-355.
Liu Kai, Ding Hu, Tang Guoan, et al. Detection of catchment-scale gully-affected areas using unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) on the Chinese loess plateau[J]. ISPRS International Journal of Geo-information, 2016,5(12):238.
朱国锋,蒲焘,张涛,等.TRMM降水数据在横断山区的精度[J].地理科学,2013,33(9):1125-1131.
中华人民共和国水利部.SL190-2007土壤侵蚀分类分级标准[S].北京:中国水利水电出版社,2008.
钟祥浩,刘淑珍.山地环境理论与实践[M].北京:科学出版社,2014.
陈云浩,李晓兵,史培军.1983-1992年中国陆地NDVI变化的气候因子驱动分析[J].植物生态学报,2001,25(6):716-720.
崔鹏,韦方强,谢洪,等.中国西部泥石流及其减灾对策[J].第四纪研究,2003,23(2):142-151.
唐川,丁军,梁京涛.汶川震区北川县城泥石流源地特征的遥感动态分析[J].工程地质学报,2010,18(1):1-7.
潘华丽,欧国强,柳金峰.泥石流沟道侵蚀初探[J].灾害学,2009,24(1):39-43.
康志成,李焯芬,马蔼乃.中国泥石流研究[M].北京:科学出版社,2004.
0
浏览量
945
下载量
5
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010802024621