北京林业大学 水土保持学院,北京,100083
纸质出版:2018
移动端阅览
夏晓平, 信忠保, 孔庆仙. 北京山区河岸植被恢复立地类型划分[J]. 水土保持通报, 2018,38(2):223-227.
XIA Xiaoping, XIN Zhongbao, KONG Qingxian. Site Classification of Riparian Vegetation Restoration in Beijing Mountain Area[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2018, 38(2): 223-227.
夏晓平, 信忠保, 孔庆仙. 北京山区河岸植被恢复立地类型划分[J]. 水土保持通报, 2018,38(2):223-227. DOI: 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2018.02.036.
XIA Xiaoping, XIN Zhongbao, KONG Qingxian. Site Classification of Riparian Vegetation Restoration in Beijing Mountain Area[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2018, 38(2): 223-227. DOI: 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2018.02.036.
[目的]对北京山区不同立地条件下的河岸带进行立地类型分类,为山区河岸带的植被恢复工作提供理论依据。[方法]以北京市怀柔区怀九河河岸60个80 m长的样地为基础,进行野外实地观测调查,并确定了土壤层厚度、坡面组成物质、坡度、硬化面积、坡长5个因子为河岸立地类型划分的主导因子。[结果]①怀九河河岸带的立地类型可划分为3个立地类型区,9个立地类型组,15个立地类型。②加杨、旱柳、荆条、胡枝子等作为适宜当地生长的优势植物种,在进行植被恢复时可结合其它适生物种进行合理的配置。[结论]北京山区河岸带多以短坡薄土层为主,边坡坡面砾石裸露严重,表现为严重的人为干扰,应加快河岸边坡生态环境安全建设。
[Objective] Site classification is the basic work of vegetation restoration in riparian
and is conducive to provide basic theoretical basis for the vegetation restoration of the riparian zone in the mountain area.[Methods] 60 plots totally having 80 m long in the riparian zone of Huaijiu River in Huairou mountain area
Beijing area
were investigated. 5 factors of soil layer thickness
slope material composition
slope
hardening area and slope length were used as the dominant factors of site classification.[Results] ① Sites of Huaijiu River riparian zone were divided into 3 types
9 groups
15 subgroups. ② Populus Canadensis
Salix Matsudana
Vitex Negundo heterophylla
Lespedeza were as suitable for local revegetation as dominant species and other suitable ones as subdominant or auxiliary species.[Conclusion] The riparian zone in Beijing mountain area is mainly covered by short slope with thin soil layer
and gravel-exposed obviously and is seriously disturbance. Hence
ecological environment safety construction of riparian slope should be accelerated.
王家生,孔丽娜,林木松,等.河岸带特征和功能研究综述[J].长江科学院院报,2011,28(11):28-35.
赵广琦,崔心红,张群,等.河岸带植被重建的生态修复技术及应用[J].水土保持研究,2010,17(1):252-258.
韩路,王海珍,于军.河岸带生态学研究进展与展望[J].生态环境学报,2013,22(5):879-886.
段丽军.河岸带生态功能研究综述[J].华北国土资源,2015,13(2):95-96.
尹海魁,许皞,李大伟,等.露天铁矿山典型立地类型划分与主导因子分析[J].金属矿山,2016,45(6):173-179.
葛成立,林文涛,周永,等.徐州石灰岩山地侧柏纯林立地类型划分[J].江苏林业科技,2015,42(4):35-44.
李丹雄,赵廷宁,张艳,等.太行山北段东麓采石废弃地立地类型划分及评价[J].中国水土保持科学,2015,13(2):112-117.
陈何盾.半干旱风沙区立地类型划分与抗逆树种选择[J].山西林业科技,2009,38(3):29-32.
王富,李红丽,董鲁光,等.淄博市周边破坏山体立地类型划分[J].山东林业科技,2008,38(3):41-43.
雍鹏,邝立刚,梁守伦,等.吕梁山东侧黄土丘陵立地区立地划分:山西省立地类型划分与造林模式研究(Ⅴ)[J].山西林业科技,2009,38(2):1-2,9.
李红丽,丁国栋,董智,等.中捷农场滨海盐碱地立地类型划分及其植被恢复技术[J].中国水土保持科学,2010,8(5):86-91.
刘强,滕文华,刘峰,等.大庆市森林立地类型划分与评价[J].防护林科技,2013,31(12):81-83,96.
Grondin P, Gauthier S, et al. A new approach to ecological land classification for the Canadian boreal forest that integrates disturbances[J]. Landscape Ecology, 2014,29(1):1-16.
Ray D, Xenakis G,Tene A et al. Developing a site classification system to assess the impact of climate change on species selection in Ireiand[J]. Irish Forestry, 2009,66(1/2):101-122.
黄凯,郭怀成,刘永,等.河岸带生态系统退化机制及其恢复研究进展[J].应用生态学报,2007,18(6):1373-1382.
陈兴茹.国内外河流生态修复相关研究进展[J].水生态学杂志,2011,32(5):122-128.
Oppenheimer J D, Beaugh S K, Knudson J A, et al. A collaborative model for large-scale riparian restoration in the western United States[J]. Restoration Ecology, 2015,23(2):143-148.
邓送求,闫家锋,关庆伟,等.基于聚类分析的风景林立地类型划分[J].南京林业大学学报:自然科学版,2009,33(3):73-77.
张怡,丁迎盈,王大安,等.坡度对侵蚀产沙及其粒径分布的影响[J].水土保持学报,2015,29(6):25-29.
侯旭蕾,吕殿青,王辉,等.坡度对红壤土坡面降雨侵蚀及水文过程的影响[J].灌溉排水科学,2013,32(6):118-121.
0
浏览量
977
下载量
2
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010802024621