贵州师范大学 地理与环境科学学院,贵州,贵阳,550025
纸质出版:2018
移动端阅览
芦颖, 李旭东, 杨正业. 1990-2015年贵州省乌江流域生态环境质量变化评价[J]. 水土保持通报, 2018,38(2):140-147.
LU Ying, LI Xudong, YANG Zhengye. Evaluation on Eco-environmental Quality Change of Wujiang River Basin in Guizhou Province from 1990 to 2015[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2018, 38(2): 140-147.
芦颖, 李旭东, 杨正业. 1990-2015年贵州省乌江流域生态环境质量变化评价[J]. 水土保持通报, 2018,38(2):140-147. DOI: 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2018.02.023.
LU Ying, LI Xudong, YANG Zhengye. Evaluation on Eco-environmental Quality Change of Wujiang River Basin in Guizhou Province from 1990 to 2015[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2018, 38(2): 140-147. DOI: 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2018.02.023.
[目的]通过对贵州省乌江流域生态环境质量动态变化特征分析,为山地流域生态可持续发展及长江流域水环境生态文明建设等提供参考。[方法]基于1990,2000及2015年3期Landsat系列遥感影像和ASTER GDEM数据提取贵州省乌江流域植被盖度、土壤指数、土壤湿度等基础数据,利用专家咨询法确定各指标权重并构建综合指数评价模型后对贵州省乌江流域生态环境质量时空变化特征展开分析。[结果]①1990-2015年间贵州省乌江流域生态环境质量以"优"、"良"为主,占比超过65%,总体生态环境质量呈上升趋势。②3期数据表明贵州省乌江流域生态环境质量空间差异逐渐增大,生态环境改善地区主要分布于乌江下游,生态环境退化地区主要集中于乌江中上游,总体生态环境质量表现为下游优于中上游。③研究区生态环境质量受城市化水平影响较大,25 a间研究区内各市州主城区生态环境质量下降明显,主要受建成区面积增加影响。[结论]高精度长时段的生态环境质量评价能很好反映区域生态环境质量变化特征。未来应进一步加强贵州省乌江流域中上游生态环境治理,尤其注重引导研究区内各市州城市化进程与生态环境协调可持续发展。
[Objective] To analyze the dynamic characteristics of ecological environment quality in Wujiang River basin of Guizhou Province in oreder to provide reference for ecological sustainable development in mountainous basins and ecological civilization construction in the water environment of Yangtze River basin.[Methods] Landsat in 1990
2000 and 2015 and ASTER GDEM data were used to extract the basic data of vegetation coverage
soil index and soil moisture in Wujiang River basin of Guizhou Province. The weight of each index was determined by expert consultation method. The spatial and temporal changes of ecological environment quality in Wujiang River basin of Guizhou Province were analyzed by comprehensive index evaluation model.[Results] ① During the period from 1990 to 2015
the qualities of ecological environment in Wujiang River basin of Guizhou Province were mainly in "excellent" and "good" levels
accounting for more than 65%. The overall ecological environment quality was showed an upward trend. ② The data show that the spatial differences of ecological environment quality in Wujiang River basin of Guizhou Province were gradually increased
and the ecological environment improvement areas were mainly distributed in the lower reaches of Wujiang River. The degraded areas of ecological environment were mainly concentrated in the upper and middle reaches of Wujiang River. The quality of ecological environment showed that the downstream was better than the middle and upper reaches. ③ The quality of ecological environment in the study area was greatly affected by the level of urbanization
and the ecological environment quality of the main urban areas in the study area decreased significantly during the past 25 years
which was mainly affected by the increase of the built-up area.[Conclusion] The high-precision and long long-term evaluation of ecological environment quality can well reflect the changing characteristics of regional ecological environment quality change. In the future
we should further strengthen the ecological environment management in the middle and upper reaches of the Wujiang River basin in Guizhou Province
with particular emphasis on guiding the coordinated development of the urbanization process and ecological environment in the cities and counties in the study area.
徐燕,周华荣.初论我国生态环境质量评价研究进展[J].干旱区地理,2003,26(2):166-172.
肖明.GIS在流域生态环境质量评价中的应用[D].海南海口:海南大学,2011.
Crabtree B, Bayfield N. Developing sustai-nability indicators for mountaine cosystems:A study of the caingorms scotland[J]. Journal of Environment Management, 1998,52(1):1-14.
Walz R. Development of environmental indicator systems. Experiences from Germany[J].Environmental Management, 2000,25(6):613-623.
Kamp I V, Lerdelmeijer K, Marsman G, et al. Urban enenviromental quality and human well-being:Towards a conceptual framework and demarcation of concepts; a literature study[J]. Landscape and Urban Planning, 2003,65(1/2):5-18.
Rombouts I, Beaugrand G, Artigas F, et al. Evaluating marine ecosystem health:Case studies of indicators using direct observations and modeling methods[J]. Ecological Indicator, 2013,24(1):353-365.
陆雍森.环境评价[M].上海:同济大学出版社,1999:15-35.
万本太,王文杰,崔书红,等.城市生态环境质量评价方法[J].生态学报,2009,29(3):1068-1073.
孙东琪,张京祥,朱传耿,等.中国生态环境质量变化态势及其空间分异分析[J].地理学报,2012,67(12):1599-1610.
颜梅春,王元超.区域生态环境质量评价研究进展与展望[J].生态环境学报,2012,21(10):1781-1788.
魏伟,石培基,周俊菊,等.基于GIS和组合赋权法的石羊河流域生态环境质量评价[J].干旱区资源与环境,2015,29(1):175-180.
凡宸,夏北成,秦建桥.基于RS和GIS的县域生态环境质量综合评价模型:以惠东县为例[J].生态学志,2013,32(3):719-725.
王鹏,魏信,乔玉良.多尺度下汾河流域生态环境质量评价与时序分析[J].遥感技术与应用,2011,26(6):798-807.
张春桂,李计英.基于3S技术的区域生态环境质量监测研究[J].自然资源学报,2010,25(12):2060-2071.
易武英,苏维词.基于RS和GIS的乌江流域生态安全度变化评价[J].中国岩溶,2014,33(3):2308-2318.
郜红娟,韩会庆,俞洪燕,等.乌江流域重要生态系统服务地形梯度分布特征分析[J].生态科学,2016,35(5):154-159.
向鹏,王仕禄,卢玮琦,等.乌江流域梯级水库的氮磷分布及其滞留效率研究[J].地球与环境,2016,44(5):492-501.
王尧,蔡运龙,潘懋.贵州省乌江流域土壤侵蚀模拟:基于GIS,RUSLE和ANN技术的研究[J].中国地质,2014,41(5):1735-1747.
中国水利百科全书编辑委员会.中国水利百科全书[M].2版.北京:中国水利水电出版社,2006:90-97.
李洪义,史舟,郭亚东,等.基于遥感与GIS技术的福建省生态环境质量评价[J].遥感技术与应用,2006,21(1):49-54.
田庆久,闵祥军.植被指数研究进展[J].地球科学进展,1998,13(4):327-333.
白艳芬,马海州,张宝成,等.基于遥感和GIS技术的青海湖环湖地区生态环境脆弱性评价[J].遥感技术与应用,2009,24(5):635-641.
史世莲,章文波,王国燕.北京地区植被盖度提取及其分布变化研究[J].遥感技术与应用,2014,29(5):866-872.
许幼霞,周旭,赵翠薇,等.1990-2015年间贵州省植被生态环境质量变化特征[J].地球与环境,2017,45(4):434-440.
Huang C, Wylie B, Yang L. Derivation of a tasseled cap transformation based on Landsat 7 at-satellite reflectance[J]. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 2002,23(8):1741-1748.
王福民,黄敬峰,徐俊锋.基于穗帽变换的IKONOS多光谱和全色影像融合[J].浙江大学学报:工学版,2008,42(8):1380-1384.
徐建春,赵英时,刘振华.利用遥感和GIS研究内蒙古中西部地区环境变化[J].遥感学报,2002,6(2):142-149.
赵慧,张明明,赵艳玲.TM6温度信息提取研究[J].科技创新导报,2008,17(7):7.
邓慧平,李秀彬.地形指数的物理意义分析[J].地理科学进展,2002,21(2):103-110.
朱远辉,刘凯,艾彬,等.新丰江流域生态环境质量遥感评价[J].热带地理,2013,33(2):133-140.
0
浏览量
1472
下载量
5
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010802024621