1. 成都信息工程大学 大气科学学院,四川,成都,610225
2. 贵州省山地环境气候 研究所,贵州,贵阳,550002
3. 四川省气象局气象服务中心,四川,成都,610072
纸质出版:2018
移动端阅览
何兴潼, 袁淑杰, 谷晓平, 等. 贵州省喀斯特区域土壤水分持续上升时期气象要素对土壤水分的影响[J]. 水土保持通报, 2018,38(2):87-94.
HE Xingtong, YUAN Shujie, GU Xiaoping, et al. Response of Soil Moisture in Arising Term to Meteorological Factors over Karst Area of Guizhou Province[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2018, 38(2): 87-94.
何兴潼, 袁淑杰, 谷晓平, 等. 贵州省喀斯特区域土壤水分持续上升时期气象要素对土壤水分的影响[J]. 水土保持通报, 2018,38(2):87-94. DOI: 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2018.02.015.
HE Xingtong, YUAN Shujie, GU Xiaoping, et al. Response of Soil Moisture in Arising Term to Meteorological Factors over Karst Area of Guizhou Province[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2018, 38(2): 87-94. DOI: 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2018.02.015.
[目的]系统分析气象环境要素对贵州省喀斯特地区土壤水分变化的影响,为该喀斯特区域土壤水分的预报、生态环境恢复以及农业产业化的优化布局提供理论参考。[方法]基于贵州喀斯特区域10个自动土壤水分观测站2011-2015年逐日土壤水分、降水量、气温、地表温度、相对湿度、风速和日照时数资料,针对不同农业气候区逐日土壤水分持续上升且气温持续上升或下降两个不同时段,分析气象要素对土壤水分的影响。[结果]①气象要素对土壤湿度的影响具有一定的滞后性,其滞后时间为10~30 d。②降水、气温、地表温度为影响土壤水分变化的最主要因子,与土壤水分相关系数为0.66~0.95;风速对土壤水分变化的影响较弱,相关系数 < 0.40,相对湿度、辐射的相关系数仅在气温下降时期 > 0.60。③气温越高、累计降水量越小,则累计降水滞后时间越短,但气温和地表温度滞后时间越长。④研究时段内累计降水大于22.4~135 mm (气温持续上升)或11.2~54.7 mm (气温持续下降)时,其余气象要素的变化不能改变土壤水分的上升趋势。⑤不同农业气候区气象要素与土壤水分关系模型绝大部分 < 5%,误差较小,较准确反映了气象要素对土壤水分的影响。[结论]贵州省喀斯特区域10 cm逐日土壤水分对气候要素的响应存在滞后性,而气象要素对土壤水分变化的滞后时间、相关系数的差别,主要原因是农业气候区、气象要素、逐日土壤水分变化阶段不同引起。
[Objective] A systematic analysis of the impact of meteorological elements on soil moisture in karst area of Guizhou Province was conducted to provide theoretical reference for the prediction of soil moisture
restoration of ecological environment and the optimization of agricultural industrialization in this karst area.[Methods] The effects of meteorological factors on soil moisture were analyzed using two divisional dataset. One dataset is that had increased daily soil moisture and air temperature
another dataset is that had arose soil moisture but declined air temperature. Meteorological factors had daily soil moisture
precipitation
temperature
surface temperature
relative humidity
wind speed and sunshine duration of 10 soil moisture automatic observation stations in karst area of Guizhou Province from 2011 to 2015.[Results] ① The effect of different meteorological factors on the daily soil moisture was lagged to some extent and its lagging time were 10~30 days. ② Precipitation
temperature and surface temperature were the main influence factors of soil water change
having correlation coefficients of 0.66~0.95. The effects of wind speed on soil moisture change were generally weak in majority of agroclimatic zones
its correlation coefficients were less than 0.40. The correlation coefficients of radiation
relative humidity and soil moisture were greater than 0.60 when air temperature was declined. ③ High preceding air temperature and low previous cumulative precipitation were followed by reduced lagging days of precipitation
but the lagging days of air temperature and surface soil temperature were prolonged meanwhile. ④ Precipitation played a major role in the daily soil moisture changes. Changes of other meteorological factors cannot change the downward trend of daily soil moisture when accumulative precipitation was more than 22.4~135 mm in arising stage of air temperature
or when it was greater than 11.2~54.7 mm in declining stage. ⑤ The model between soil moisture and meteorological factors had small (<5.00%)
can reflected accurately the influences of meteorological factors on soil moisture.[Conclusion] The response of 10 cm daily soil moisture to climatic factors in Guizhou karst region was lagged. The differences of the lagging time and the correlation coefficient between meteorological elements and soil moisture were mainly caused by stage differences of agroclimatic zones
meteorological factors and daily soil moisture changes.
蒋冲,王飞,穆兴民,等.黄土高原农田土壤湿度演变及其与气候变化的响应关系[J].干旱地区农业研究,2012,30(3):234-243.
Koster R D, Dirmeyer P A, Guo Z, et al. Regions of strong coupling between soil moisture and precipitation[J]. Science, 2004,305(5687):1138-1140.
林洁,陈效民,张勇.气候变化与土壤湿度关系的研究进展[J].土壤通报,2012,43(5):1271-1276.
李卓,吴普特,冯浩,等.容重对土壤水分蓄持能力影响模拟试验研究[J].土壤学报,2010,47(4):611-620.
杨与广,刘志辉,乔鹏.天山北坡融雪期土壤湿度特征及其影响因子[J].干旱区研究,2012,29(1):173-178.
李小英,段争虎.黄土高原土壤水分与植被相互作用研究进展[J].土壤通报,2012(6):1508-1514.
王素萍,张存杰,宋连春,等.多尺度气象干旱与土壤相对湿度的关系研究[J].冰川冻土,2013,35(4):865-873.
刘伟,王世杰,罗维均,等.贵州荔波喀斯特与非喀斯特地区土壤水运移的对比研究[J].地球与环境,2011,39(2):137-149.
蔡进军,张源润,潘占兵,等.宁夏黄土丘陵区苜蓿土壤水分的时空变异特征[J].水土保持研究,2016,23(1):75-79.
Philip J R. Plant Water Relations:Some Physical Aspects[J]. Annual Review of Plant Physiology, 1966,17(1):245-268.
Nielsen D R. Spatial variability of field-measured soil-water properties[J]. Hilgardia, 1973,42(7):215-259.
Cho E, Choi M. Regional scale spatio-temporal variability of soil moisture and its relationship with meteorological factors over the Korean peninsula[J]. Journal of Hydrology, 2014,516(17):317-329.
马柱国,魏和林,符淙斌.土壤湿度与气候变化关系的研究进展与展望[J].地球科学进展,1999,14(3):299-305.
杨永辉,渡边正孝,王智平,等.气候变化对太行山土壤水分及植被的影响[J].地理学报,2004,59(1):56-63.
左志燕,张人禾.中国东部春季土壤湿度的时空变化特征[J].中国科学,2008,38(11):1428-1437.
赵荣玮,张建军,李玉婷,等.晋西黄土区人工林地土壤水分特征及其对降雨的响应[J].水土保持学报,2016,30(1):178-183.
韩湘云,景元书,李根.低丘红壤坡面土壤水分变化的气象因素冗余分析[J].生态学杂志,2013,32(9):2368-2374.
李辑,李雨鸿,胡春丽,等.辽西干旱区春播期土壤相对湿度动态预测模型研究[J].土壤通报,2014,45(4):830-834.
王朝文,张玉环.贵州省农业气候区划[M].贵州贵阳:贵州人民出版社,1989:55-56.
裴益轩,郭民.滑动平均法的基本原理及应用[J].火炮发射与控制学报,2001(1):21-23.
和清华,谢云.我国太阳总辐射气候学计算方法研究[J].自然资源学报,2010,25(2):308-319.
0
浏览量
1102
下载量
5
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010802024621