秸秆还田深度对黄棕壤养分及物理性质的影响

任晓明; 陈粲; 陈效民; 曲成闯; 韩召强; 张晓玲; 孟子惟

doi:10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2018.02.010

您当前的位置：

首页 >

文章列表页 >

秸秆还田深度对黄棕壤养分及物理性质的影响

试验研究

- 秸秆还田深度对黄棕壤养分及物理性质的影响
- Effects of Straw Returning Depth on Nutrients and Physical Properties of Yellow Brown Soil
- 水土保持通报 2018年38卷第2期页码：58-64
- 作者机构：
  
  1. 南京农业大学资源与环境科学学院,江苏,南京,210095
  2. 南京信息工程大学应用气象学院,江苏,南京,210044
- 作者简介：
- 基金信息：
  
  江苏省自然科学基金项目“不同秸秆还田方式下旱地农田温室气体的长期模拟与预测”（SBK2015040286）;中科院南京土壤所开放基金项目（Y20160038）;博士后基金（2016M591884）
- DOI：10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2018.02.010
  中图分类号：
- 纸质出版：2018
- 稿件说明：
移动端阅览
任晓明, 陈粲, 陈效民, 等. 秸秆还田深度对黄棕壤养分及物理性质的影响[J]. 水土保持通报, 2018,38(2):58-64.

REN Xiaoming, CHEN Can, CHEN Xiaomin, et al. Effects of Straw Returning Depth on Nutrients and Physical Properties of Yellow Brown Soil[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2018, 38(2): 58-64.
任晓明, 陈粲, 陈效民, 等. 秸秆还田深度对黄棕壤养分及物理性质的影响[J]. 水土保持通报, 2018,38(2):58-64. DOI： 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2018.02.010.

REN Xiaoming, CHEN Can, CHEN Xiaomin, et al. Effects of Straw Returning Depth on Nutrients and Physical Properties of Yellow Brown Soil[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2018, 38(2): 58-64. DOI： 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2018.02.010.

摘要

[目的

]

通过改变秸秆还田深度来探讨其对黄棕壤养分和物理性状的影响，探索最适秸秆还田深度，为提高秸秆利用率和改善土壤理化性质提供科学依据。[方法

]

以黄棕壤为研究对象，设置5个处理：无秸秆还田（CK）、表面覆盖（T

）、10 cm还田（T

）、20 cm还田（T

）和30 cm还田（T

），分析了小麦收获后土壤0-40 cm土层物理性质和土壤养分状况。[结果

]

①秸秆还田能显著降低土壤容重，增加土壤总孔隙度、饱和含水量、田间持水量和有效水含量，使土壤有机质、有效磷和全氮含量分别增加6.56%~9.96%，2.81%~7.32%和1.67%~10.00%； ②秸秆还田减少了土壤铵态氮和硝态氮含量，降幅为1.48%~15.04%和14.90%~53.42%，其中土壤硝态氮含量与秸秆还田深度呈显著负相关关系； ③由主成分分析可知，各处理下的土壤综合得分次序为：T

> T

> CK，说明秸秆还田处理能改善土壤养分和物理状况，其中秸秆还田深度为20 cm时效果最为显著。[结论

]

综合黄棕壤物理性状和养分含量，秸秆还田深度20 cm处理最为适宜。

Abstract

[Objective] The effects of different straw returning depths on nutrients and physical characters of yellow brown soil were studied in order to explore the optimal straw returning depth and to provide a scientific basis for improving straw utilization

and soil physical and chemical properties as well.[Methods] This research studied on yellow brown soil

and five treatments of straw returning were set:no straw turning(CK)

straw covering surface(T0)

10 cm-straw turning(T10)

20 cm-straw turning(T20) and 30 cm-straw turning(T30)

to analyze soil physical indexes and nutrient contents of 0-40 cm soil layer after wheat harvest.[Results] ① Straw returning decreased the soil bulk density and increased the soil total porosity

saturated water content

field water holding capacity and effective water content. These treatments improved the contents of SOM

AP and total-N in soil by 6.56%~9.96%

2.81%~7.32% and 1.67%~10.00%

respectively; ② Straw returning treatments decreased the contents of NO3--N and NH4+-N by 14.90%~53.42% and 1.48%~15.04%

respectively. There was a significantly negative correlation between NO3--N content and the depth of straw returning. ③ The principal component analysis showed that comprehensive score in different straw returning depth treatments decreased in the following order:T20 > T30 > T10 > T0 > CK

which elucidated that straw returning improved nutrients and physical properties of yellow brown soil

and it showed the most significant depth of straw returning was 20 cm.[Conclusions] If physical properties and nutrient contents were considered

the best depth of straw returning was 20 cm.

关键词

Keywords

references

张丽,张中东,郭正宇,等.深松耕作和秸秆还田对农田土壤物理特性的影响[J].水土保持通报,2015,35(1):112-117.

Zhang Guosheng, Chan K Y, Li Guangdi,et al. Effect of straw and plastic film management under contrasting tillage practices on the physical properties of an erodible loess soil[J]. Soil and Tillage Research, 2008,98(2):113-119.

朱利群,张大伟,卞新民,等.连续秸秆还田与耕作方式轮换对稻麦轮作田土壤理化性状变化及水稻产量构成的影响[J].土壤通报,2011,42(1):81-85.

赵伟,陈雅君,王宏燕,等.不同秸秆还田方式对黑土土壤氮素和物理性状的影响[J].玉米科学,2012,20(6):98-102.

王改玲,郝明德,陈德立.秸秆还田对灌溉玉米田土壤反硝化及N

O排放的影响[J].植物营养与肥料学报,2006,12(6):840-844.

潘志勇,吴文良,牟子平,等.不同秸秆还田模式和施氮量对农田CO

排放的影响[J].土壤肥料,2006(1):14-16.

强雪彩,袁红莉,高旺盛.秸秆还田量对土壤CO

释放和土壤微生物量的影响[J].应用生态学报,2004,15(3):469-472.

张电学,韩志卿,李东坡,等.不同促腐条件下秸秆还田对土壤微生物量碳氮磷动态变化的影响[J].应用生态学报,2005,16(10):1903-1908.

张电学,韩志卿,刘微,等.不同促腐条件下玉米秸秆直接还田的生物学效应研究[J].植物营养与肥料学报,2005,11(6):36-43.

Sierra J. Temperature and soil moisture dependence of N mineralization in intact soil cores[J]. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 1997,29(9):1557-1563.

Balota E L, Machineski O, Matos M A. Soilmircrobial biomass under different tillage and levels of applied pigs lurry[J]. Revista Brasileirade Engenharia Agricolae Ambiental, 2012,16(5):487-495.

中国科学院南京土壤研究所土壤物理研究室编.土壤物理性质测定法[M].北京:科学出版社,1978.

Ning Tangyuan, Han Bin, Jiao Nianyuan, et al. Effects of conservation tillage on soil porosity in maize-wheat cropping system.[J]. Plant Soil & Environment, 2009, 55(8):327-333.

慕平,张恩和,王汉宁,等.连续多年秸秆还田对玉米耕层土壤理化性状及微生物量的影响[J].水土保持学报,2011,25(5):81-85.

李新举,张志国,李贻学.土壤深度对还田秸秆腐解速度的影响[J].土壤学报,2001,38(1):135-138.

Kahlon M S, Lal R, Ann Varughese M. Twenty two years of tillage and mulching impacts on soil physical characteristics and carbon sequestration in Central Ohio[J]. Soil & Tillage Research, 2013,126(1):151-158.

崔婷婷,窦森,杨轶囡,等.秸秆深还对土壤腐殖质组成和胡敏酸结构特征的影响[J].土壤学报,2014,51(4):718-725.

矫丽娜,李志洪,殷程程,等.高量秸秆不同深度还田对黑土有机质组成和酶活性的影响[J].土壤学报,2015,52(3):665-672.

武际,郭熙盛,鲁剑巍,等.不同水稻栽培模式下小麦秸秆腐解特征及对土壤生物学特性和养分状况的影响[J].生态学报,2013,33(2):565-575.

潘剑玲,代万安,尚占环,等.秸秆还田对土壤有机质和氮素有效性影响及机制研究进展[J].中国生态农业学报,2013,21(5):526-535.

张亚丽,张娟,沈其荣,等.秸秆生物有机肥的施用对土壤供氮能力的影响[J].应用生态学报,2002,13(12):1575-1578.

Nicholson F A, Chambers B J, Mills A R, et al. Effects of repeated straw incorporation on crop fertilizer nitrogen requirements, soil mineral nitrogen and nitrate leaching losses[J]. Soil Use and Management, 1997,13(3):136-142.

浏览量

796

下载量

CSCD

文章被引用时，请邮件提醒。

提交

工具集

关联资源

阔叶幼林取代杉木林后的土壤肥力研究

城郊不同土地利用方式坡地土壤养分空间动态研究

黄土丘陵沟壑区退耕地人工柠条林土壤养分特征及其空间变异

施肥条件下保水剂对土壤蒸发和土壤团聚性状的影响

山地林火烧迹地土壤养分的动态变化