1. 合肥工业大学 土木与水利工程学院,安徽,合肥,230009
2. 新疆维吾尔自治区交通规划勘察设计研究院,新疆,乌鲁木齐,830006
纸质出版:2018
移动端阅览
叶潇潇, 钱德玲, 朱志鹏, 等. 基于组合赋权法的中巴公路奥依塔克至布伦口段泥石流危险性评价[J]. 水土保持通报, 2018,38(1):246-251.
YE Xiaoxiao, QIAN Deling, ZHU Zhipeng, et al. Hazard Assessment of Debris Flow at Aoyitake-Bulunkou Section of China-Pakistan Highway Based on Combined Weight Method[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2018, 38(1): 246-251.
叶潇潇, 钱德玲, 朱志鹏, 等. 基于组合赋权法的中巴公路奥依塔克至布伦口段泥石流危险性评价[J]. 水土保持通报, 2018,38(1):246-251. DOI: 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2018.01.043.
YE Xiaoxiao, QIAN Deling, ZHU Zhipeng, et al. Hazard Assessment of Debris Flow at Aoyitake-Bulunkou Section of China-Pakistan Highway Based on Combined Weight Method[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2018, 38(1): 246-251. DOI: 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2018.01.043.
[目的]研究泥石流危险性,为泥石流多发地区危险性评价指标权重的确定提供一种有效的方法。[方法]针对单一赋权法确定权重的缺陷,分别采用层次分析法和熵值法确定中巴公路泥石流危险性评价指标的主观和客观权重,再用组合赋权法确定指标的综合权重。以中巴公路沿线重点单沟泥石流为例,选取爆发规模、爆发频率、主沟长度、流域切割密度、流域面积、流域相对高差、主沟纵坡、24 h最大降雨量、松散堆积物厚度、泥沙补给段长度比10个指标作为评价因子。获取泥石流现场调查数据后,依据上述方法对该区域泥石流的危险性进行评价,并将计算结果与集对分析方法和现场调查结果进行了对比分析。[结果]属于中度危险的沟谷只有5条,占25%,说明该地区大部分泥石流危险性偏高。[结论]评价结果与现场调查结果吻合,证明了该方法的可行性。
[Objective] The hazard assessment of debris flow was studied in order to provide an effective method for determining the weights of hazard assessment indexes in debris flow prone area.[Methods] In view of the weakness of single assigning weight method
analytic hierarchy process (AHP) and entropy method were adopted respectively to determine the subjective and objective weights of the debris flow hazard assessment indexes for the China-Pakistan highway
then the comprehensive weights were estimated based on combined weight method. Taking the debris flow along the China-Pakistan highway as a case study
this paper selected ten assessment indexes including magnitude
frequency
length of main groove
basin incision density
basin area
relative difference of elevation
longitudinal slope of main groove
maximum rainfall during 24 hours
thickness of loose deposit
length of mud and sand supply. The method mentioned above was used to assess the hazard of debris flow in this area after the acquisition of field data of debris flow. Besides
the results coincided with the set pair analysis method and field investigation results.[Results] Only five debris flow gullies
accounting for 25% of the total
were moderate dangerous
which meant that most debris flow gullies in this area were high dangerous.[Conclusion] The evaluation results were consistent with the field investigation
which confirmed the reliability of the method.
Blackwelder E. Mudflow as a geologic agent in semi-arid mountains[J]. Geological Society of America Bulletin, 1928,39(2):465-487.
足立胜治,德山九仁夫,中筋章人,等. 土石流发生危险度の判定につめて[J]. 新砂防,1977,30(3):7-16.
Gomez H, Kavzoglu T. Assessment of shallow landslide susceptibility using artificialneural networks in Jabonosa River Basin, Venezuela[J]. Engineering Geology, 2005,78(1/2):11-27.
刘希林.泥石流危险度判定的研究[J].灾害学,1988,3(3):10-15.
汪明武.基于神经网络的泥石流危险度区划[J].水文地质工程地质,2000,27(2):18-19.
汪明武,金菊良,李丽.投影寻踪新方法在泥石流危险度评价中的应用[J].水土保持学报,2002,16(6):79-81.
汪明武,李丽,金菊良.泥石流危险度的改进集对分析模型[J].自然灾害学报,2009,18(6):124-128.
匡乐红,徐林荣,刘宝琛.组合赋权法确定地质灾害危险性评价指标权重[C]//深部岩石工程与岩土灾害防治测试新技术与应用研讨会,2006:1063-1067.
铁永波,唐川.层次分析法在单沟泥石流危险度评价中的应用[J].中国地质灾害与防治学报,2006,17(4):79-84.
杨秀梅,梁收运.基于模糊层次分析法的泥石流危险度评价[J].地质灾害与环境保护,2008,19(2):73-78.
徐林荣,王磊,苏志满.隧道工程遭受泥石流灾害的工程易损性评价[J].岩土力学,2010,31(7):2153-2158.
杜国梁,高金川,李瑞冬.基于模糊综合评价法和熵值法的泥石流危险度评价[J].安全与环境工程,2013,20(5):15-17.
毛硕,王运生,曹水合.基于可拓和组合赋权的泥石流危险性评价[J].工业安全与环保,2016,42(1):56-60.
路遥,徐林荣,陈舒阳,等.基于博弈论组合赋权的泥石流危险度评价[J].灾害学,2014,29(1):194-200.
张晨,王清,陈剑平,等.金沙江流域泥石流的组合赋权法危险度评价[J].岩土力学,2011,32(3):831-836.
江强强,方堃,章广成.基于新组合赋权法的地质灾害危险性评价[J].自然灾害学报,2015,24(3):28-36.
姚兰飞,钱德玲,方成杰,等.基于灰色定权聚类模型的泥石流危险性评价[J].合肥工业大学学报:自然科学版,2017,40(6):803-808.
0
浏览量
1173
下载量
0
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010802024621