1. 陕西省土地工程建设集团有限责任公司,陕西,西安,710075
2. 陕西省土地工程建设集团有限责任公司 土地工程技术研究院,陕西,西安,710075
3. 国土资源部 退化及未利用土地整治重点实验室,陕西,西安,710075
4. 陕西省土地整治工程技术研究中心,陕西,西安,710075
纸质出版:2018
移动端阅览
董起广, 赵磊, 陈田庆, 等. 山地丘陵区土地整治中覆土需求优先度评价[J]. 水土保持通报, 2018,38(1):165-168.
DONG Qiguang, ZHAO Lei, CHEN Tianqing, et al. Priority Evaluation of Soil-covering Demand on Land Reclamation Project in Mountainous and Hilly Area[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2018, 38(1): 165-168.
董起广, 赵磊, 陈田庆, 等. 山地丘陵区土地整治中覆土需求优先度评价[J]. 水土保持通报, 2018,38(1):165-168. DOI: 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2018.01.029.
DONG Qiguang, ZHAO Lei, CHEN Tianqing, et al. Priority Evaluation of Soil-covering Demand on Land Reclamation Project in Mountainous and Hilly Area[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2018, 38(1): 165-168. DOI: 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2018.01.029.
[目的]明确山地丘陵区土地整治项目的覆土区域,指导项目区域的规划设计。[方法]选取涉及土壤构型、交通状况、立地条件、土壤理化性质等方面的7个指标,利用GIS技术,对陕西省铜川市一典型土地整治项目进行覆土优先度评价。[结果]①项目区内I级覆土需求优先度区域占到田块总面积的46.2%,其覆土的综合效益较大,可优先安排覆土;②Ⅱ级覆土需求优先度区域占田块总面积的23.7%,可根据土源情况适当进行覆土;③Ⅲ,Ⅳ级覆土优先度区域共占到田块总面积的30.1%,此2个区域覆土效益较小或基本无覆土需求,可不进行覆土。[结论]评价结果明确了各个区域的覆土需求度,较好地反映了土地整治项目区的真实情况。
[Objective] To determine the area of soil covering
in order to guide the planning and designing in hilly area land reclamation project.[Methods] Using GIS technology
seven indicators including soil construction
traffic condition
site conditions
soil physical and chemical properties were chosen to evaluate the priority of soil-covering demand of a typical land reclamation project in Tongchuan City
Shaanxi Province.[Results] ① The grade Ⅰ priority of soil covering demand of farmland accounted for 46.2% of the total area of the field. The comprehensive benefits of covering soil were high and should be covered by soil preferentially. ② The grade Ⅱ priority of soil covering demand of farmland accounted for 23.7% of the total field
where the covering soil should be made practically according to soil source. ③ The region of grade Ⅲ and grade Ⅳ totally accounted for 30.1% of the field
which had less benefit or necessity of covering soil.[Conclusion] The evaluation results reflected the fact in land reclamation project area and classified the demand of covering soil
which could provide the theoretical foundation for the design and engineering practice.
严金明,夏方舟,李强.中国土地综合整治战略顶层设计[J].农业工程学报,2012,28(14):1-9.
张正峰,杨红,谷晓坤.土地整治对平原区及丘陵区田块利用的影响[J].农业工程学报,2013,29(3):1-8.
张凤荣,张迪,安萍莉.我国耕地后备资源供给量:从经济适宜性角度分析[J].中国土地,2002(10):14-17.
王静,杨小唤,蔡红艳,等.20 a来中国占补耕地光温生产潜力时空特征[J]. 自然资源学报,2013,28(1):126-136.
Muchová Z, Leitmanová M, Petrovic F. Possibilities of optimal land use as a consequence of lessons learned from land consolidation projects (Slovakia)[J]. Ecological Engineering, 2016,90:294-306.
张超,刘佳佳,陈英义,等.土地整治区田块空间形态变化遥感监测与评价[J].农业机械学报,2017,48(1):104-111.
展炜,何立恒,金晓斌,等.基于模糊综合评价的土地整理项目绩效评价[J].南京林业大学学报:自然科学版,2009,33(2):145-148.
Mihara M. Effect of agricultural land consolidation on erosion processes in semi-mountainous paddy fields of Japan[J]. Journal of Agricultural Engineering Research, 1996,64(3):237-247.
刘勇,吴次芳,岳文泽,等.土地整理项目区的景观格局及其生态效应[J].生态学报,2008,28(5):2261-2269.
蔡琳亭,胡鑫,周维禄.三峡水库重庆库区移土培肥的效益分析:以云阳县为例[J].西南农业大学学报:社会科学版,2009,7(3):10-13.
徐良骥,许善文,严家平,等.基于粉煤灰基质充填覆土复垦的最佳覆土厚度[J]. 煤炭学报,2012,37(S2):485-488.
Feng Quanzhou, Xu Hengli. Determination of the thickness and medium of covering soil for land reclamation[J]. Agricultural Science & Technology, 2009,10(4):183-188.
陈艳华,何佳.丘陵山区耕作层覆土需求优先度评价研究:以福建省光泽县为例[J].自然资源学报,2015,30(8):1414-1424.
曲衍波,张凤荣,郭力娜,等.北京市平谷区农村居民点整理类型与优先度评判[J].农业工程学报,2011,27(7):312-319.
姜钦杰,吴宇哲.浙江省沿海县市滩涂围垦开发利用优先度研究[J].西北农林科技大学学报:社会科学版,2009,9(1):51-55.
王东,陈英,杨润慈. 黄土丘陵沟壑区耕地整治优先度及模式:以麦积区为例[J]. 资源科学,2017,39(2):231-239.
沈立宏,张超,桑玲玲,等.利用网格法确定县域农田整治优先度[J]. 农业工程学报,2012,28(18):241-247,296.
李克宇.基于主成分分析法的土地整治项目优先度评价研究[D].兰州:甘肃农业大学,2012.
0
浏览量
1232
下载量
0
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010802024621