1. 新疆维吾尔自治区气候中心,新疆,乌鲁木齐,830002
2. 新疆尼勒克县气象局,新疆,伊犁,835000
纸质出版:2018
移动端阅览
吴秀兰, 江远安, 余行杰, 等. 基于FloodArea模型的新疆尼勒克县暴雨山洪临界雨量的确定[J]. 水土保持通报, 2018,38(1):160-164.
WU Xiulan, JIANG Yuan, YU Xingjie, et al. Determining Critical Rainfall for Flash Flood Based on FloodArea Model in Nileke County of Xinjiang Wei Autonomous Region[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2018, 38(1): 160-164.
吴秀兰, 江远安, 余行杰, 等. 基于FloodArea模型的新疆尼勒克县暴雨山洪临界雨量的确定[J]. 水土保持通报, 2018,38(1):160-164. DOI: 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2018.01.028.
WU Xiulan, JIANG Yuan, YU Xingjie, et al. Determining Critical Rainfall for Flash Flood Based on FloodArea Model in Nileke County of Xinjiang Wei Autonomous Region[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2018, 38(1): 160-164. DOI: 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2018.01.028.
[目的]对尼勒克县科蒙乡吉林台苏河流域2016年6月17日发生的特大山洪过程进行模拟并结合实地考察淹没水深对模拟结果进行验证,进而确定其山洪致灾临界雨量。[方法]以新疆尼勒克县典型山洪沟为研究对象,基于FloodArea淹没模型,利用流域内气象站降水资料、高程数据及相关基础地理信息数据,选取山洪预警点并分析预警点处不同累计时效的面雨量与模拟洪水过程线的相关关系。[结果]该流域洪水的淹没水深与对应累计9 h面雨量相关性最高,确定了预警点处累计9 h的4级风险等级对应的致灾临界值分别为12.80 mm (4级),25.78 mm (3级),45.24 mm (2级),64.71 mm (1级)。[结论]淹没模型FloodArea能够较为准确地模拟出研究区暴雨山洪个例淹没过程,根据其模拟结果能够反演出不同风险等级条件下该流域的山洪致灾临界面雨量。
[Objective] To simulate and verify a flash flood process on June 17
2016 in Nileke County of Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region by a FloodArea model
in order to determine the critical rainfall for flash flood.[Methods] A typical flash flood ditch was taken as the research object. Based on FloodArea model and using meteorological data
digital elevation model data and basic geographic information data in the flash flood ditch of Kemeng Township Nileke County
the correlations between the area rainfall with different cumulative aging and the simulated flood process line was analyzed
and the best set of correlations was used to construct the formula.[Results] It was found that the highest correlation occurred between the submerged depth of the basin and the corresponding 9 hour surface rainfall. The critical rainfall threshold at 4 levels of the 9 h cumulative rainfall was 12.80(forth level)
25.78(third level)
45.24(second level) and 64.71(first level) mm
respectively.[Conclusion] The floodArea model can well simulate the flood process in the study region
and the rainfall at different risk levels of the flash flood can be reflected.
张荣焱,章国材,章毅之.暴雨诱发的山洪风险预警服务业务技术指南[M].北京:气象出版社,2015.
文明章,林昕,游立军,等.山洪灾害风险雨量评估方法研究[J].气象,2013,39(10):1325-1330.
张亚萍,沃伟峰,刘德,等.基于精细化降水分布的山洪气象条件分析[J].气象,2013,39(1):101-111.
Kereselidze D, Matchavariani L, Trapaidze V, et al. Evaluation and management of the risk of flooding river bank[J]. Engineering Geology for Society & Territory, 2015,18(7):463-466.
刘树坤.对暴雨灾害实施风险管理刻不容缓[N].中国水利报,2009-07-09(2).
张硕辅,薛光达,曾务书.湖南省洪水风险分析防洪风险图编制及其应用[J].湖南水利水电,2001(1):22-24.
赵咸榕.黄河流域洪水风险图的分析与制作[J].人民黄河,1998,20(7):45-47.
段生荣.典型小流域山洪灾害临界雨量计算分析[J].水利规划与设计,2009(2):20-21.
程卫帅.山洪灾害临界雨量研究综述[J].水科学进展,2013,24(6):901-908.
刘哲,张鹏远,刘广成.黑龙江省山洪灾害防治临界雨量计算分析[J].黑龙江水利科技,2005,33(5):6.
韩秀君,孙晓巍,李爽,等.辽宁暴雨致灾指标及灾害影响预评估[J].气象与环境学报,2014,30(6):80-84.
郑永山.甘肃省山洪灾害临界雨量分析[J].甘肃水利水电技术,2010,46(3):5-7.
姬兴杰,李凤秀,朱业玉,等.河南省洛河上游暴雨山洪致灾临界面雨量的确定[J].气象与环境学报,2015,31(6):426-616.
郑璟,谭畅,李春梅.基于洪水淹没模型的山洪致灾临界雨量确定方法研究[C]//第五届中国湖泊论坛论文集:湖泊湿地与发展.2015.
王胜,吴蓉,谢五三,等.基于FloodArea的山洪灾害风险区划研究:以淠河流域为例[J].气候变化研究进展,2016,12(5):432-441.
杨莲梅,张云惠,汤浩.2007年7月新疆三次暴雨过程的水汽特征分析[J].高原气象,2012,31(4):963-973.
Geomer. FloodArea-ArcGIS extention for calculating flooded areas:User manual(Version10.1)[M]. Geomer:Germany, 2013:1-3.
0
浏览量
1493
下载量
0
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010802024621